12.07.2015 Views

A Source Book for Ancient Church History - Mirrors

A Source Book for Ancient Church History - Mirrors

A Source Book for Ancient Church History - Mirrors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

242 A <strong>Source</strong> <strong>Book</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Ancient</strong> <strong>Church</strong> <strong>History</strong>[219]controversy (§ 48). Corresponding to the development of thetheology went that of the cultus of the <strong>Church</strong>, and already in theWest abiding characteristics appeared (§ 49). The cultus and thedisciplinary work of the bishops advanced in turn the hierarchicalorganization of the <strong>Church</strong> and the place of the bishops (§ 50),but the theory of local episcopal autonomy and the universalistictendencies of the see of Rome soon came into sharp conflict(§ 51), especially over the validity of baptism administered byheretics (§ 52). In this discussion the North African <strong>Church</strong>assumed a position which subsequently became the occasion ofthe most serious schism of the ancient <strong>Church</strong>, or Donatism. Inthis period, also, is to be set the rise of Christian Monasticism asdistinguished from ordinary Christian asceticism (§ 53). At thesame time, a dangerous rival of Christianity appeared in the East,in the <strong>for</strong>m of Manichæanism, in which were absorbed nearly allthe remnants of earlier Gnosticism (§ 54).§ 47. The Chiliastic ControversyDuring the third century the belief in chiliasm as a part of the<strong>Church</strong>'s faith died out in nearly all parts of the <strong>Church</strong>. It didnot seem called <strong>for</strong> by the condition of the <strong>Church</strong>, which wasrapidly adjusting itself to the world in which it found itself. Thescientific theology, especially that of Alexandria, found no placein its system <strong>for</strong> such an article as chiliasm. The belief lingered,however, in country places, and with it went no little oppositionto the “scientific” exegesis which by means of allegory explainedaway the promises of a millennial kingdom. The only accountwe have of this so-called “Chiliastic Controversy” is found inconnection with the history of the schism of Nepos in Egypt givenby Eusebius, But it may be safely assumed that the conditionof things here described was not peculiar to any one part of the<strong>Church</strong>, though an open schism resulting from the conflict of theold and new ideas is not found elsewhere.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!