12.07.2015 Views

A Source Book for Ancient Church History - Mirrors

A Source Book for Ancient Church History - Mirrors

A Source Book for Ancient Church History - Mirrors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

392 A <strong>Source</strong> <strong>Book</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Ancient</strong> <strong>Church</strong> <strong>History</strong>State <strong>Church</strong>, corresponding to the primary divisions of the Empire.The Emperor assumed the supreme authority in the <strong>Church</strong>,and the foundation was laid <strong>for</strong> what became under JustinianCæsaropapism. By the institution of the hierarchical gradation ofauthority and jurisdiction, <strong>for</strong> the most part corresponding to thepolitical and administrative divisions of the Empire, the <strong>Church</strong>both assumed a rigidly organized <strong>for</strong>m and came more easilyunder the control of the secular authority.(A) The Ecumenical CouncilThe Council of Nicæa was held be<strong>for</strong>e there was any definitionof the place of an ecumenical council. Many councils were heldduring the Arian controversy that were quite as representative. Itwas taken <strong>for</strong> granted that the councils were arranged in a scale ofauthority corresponding to the extent of the <strong>Church</strong> represented.The first clear statement of this principle is at the Council ofConstantinople A. D. 382.[359]Council of Constantinople, A. D. 382, Canon 2. Text, Hefele, §98.The so-called second general council was held in 381, but inthe next year nearly the same bishops were called togetherby Theodosius (cf. Theodoret, Hist. Ec., V. 9). In a letteraddressed to the Western bishops at a council at Rome thiscouncil speaks of their previous meeting at Constantinople in381 as being an ecumenical council. The query suggests itselfwhether, considering the fact that it actually only representedthe East and did represent more than one patriarchate, “ecumenical”might not be understood as being used in a sensesimilar to that in which the African bishops spoke of theircouncils as universalis. See Hefele, § 100, note.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!