29.11.2012 Views

nl_e17

nl_e17

nl_e17

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Is pedophilia a mental disorder<br />

Schmidt<br />

mentally ill. Antisocial behavior may be criminal (it often is), but it need not be a<br />

mental illness (it often is not).<br />

acknowledges in his reply that dyadic power is always unstable and multidimensional. He<br />

refers to Ng, Okami and Rind who<br />

"argue that we are upset by this lack of consensus o<strong>nl</strong>y when sexuality is involved,<br />

and this they regard as an ideological reaction. Neither argument can be<br />

effectively refuted. Yet, both Okami and Rind fail to make it clear whether their<br />

reference to these truisms means that they recognize no special characteristics of<br />

child-adult sexual interaction. [..T]hey avoid the central question underlying the<br />

debate on pedophilia: Is there anything special about adult-child sex ual<br />

relations?"<br />

This is the central question for Schmidt. He is not convinced by Rind's five cases, which he sees<br />

as "exceptions" and the seeing of a general trend in these cases "breathtakingly simple and<br />

naïve".<br />

Schmidt agrees with the commentators who have rejected the cross-cultural variance as an<br />

argument. 'The people of Sambia cannot help us'. So, he does not develop the argument, but he<br />

has great respect for these contributions:<br />

"They sow doubts about positions that have come to be taken for granted in<br />

Western societies, and they keep the discussion open in a direction to which too<br />

little attention is given today: fairness against pedophiles. And they demonstrate<br />

admirable courage."<br />

The reporter looks back<br />

A very good initiative to make this special issue.<br />

We could not expect unanimity, but we have seen reasonable thinking and polite arguing with<br />

a lot of subtle differences in approach.<br />

The main recurring points of discussion were:<br />

(1) The distinction to be made between the different discourses;<br />

(2) The distinction to be made between the rich variety of pedophile behavior;<br />

(3) The question of harm, especially inevitable harm;<br />

(4) The question of whether a deviancy should always be regarded as an illness;<br />

(5) The validity of the cross-cultural arguments.<br />

http://home.wanadoo.<strong>nl</strong>/ipce/library_two/files/asb.htm (12 of 13) [6/5/2005 8:43:19 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!