29.11.2012 Views

nl_e17

nl_e17

nl_e17

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Butler, "The Double Standard of Morality," Oct. 1886<br />

And do you see the logical necessity involved in this? It is that a<br />

large section of female society has to be told off--set aside, so to<br />

speak, to minister to the irregularities of the excusable man. That<br />

section is doomed to death, hurled to despair; while another section of<br />

womanhood is kept strictly and almost forcibly guarded in domestic<br />

purity. Thus even good and moral men have so judged in regard to the<br />

vice of sexual immorality as to concede in social opinion all that the<br />

male profligate can desire. This perverse social and public opinion is<br />

no small incentive to immorality. It encourages the pernicious belief<br />

that men may be profligate when young without serious detriment to<br />

their character in after-life. This is not a belief that is borne out by facts.<br />

Marriage does not transform a man’s nature, nor uproot habits<br />

that have grown with his years: the licentious imagination continues its<br />

secret blight, though the outward conduct may be restrained. The man<br />

continues to be what he was, selfish and unrestrained, though he may<br />

be outwardly moral in deference to the opinion of that "society" which<br />

having previously excused his vices, now expects him to be moral.<br />

And what of that other being, his partner--his wife--into whose<br />

presence he brings the secret consciousness, it may be the hideous<br />

morbid fruits, of his former impurity? Can any man, with any pretension<br />

to true ma<strong>nl</strong>iness, contemplate calmly the shame--the cruelty--of the<br />

fact that such marriages are not exceptional, especially in the upper<br />

classes?<br />

The CONSEQUENCES of sins of impurity far out-last the sin<br />

itself, both in individuals and in communities. Worldly and impure men<br />

have thought, and still think, they can separate women, as I have said,<br />

into two classes,--the protected and refined ladies who are not o<strong>nl</strong>y to<br />

be good, but who are, if possible, to know nothing except what is good;<br />

and those poor outcast daughters of the people whom they purchase<br />

with money, and with whom they think they may consort in evil<br />

whenever it pleases them to do so, before returning to their own<br />

separated and protected homes.<br />

The double standard of morality owes its continued existence<br />

very greatly to the want of a common sentiment concerning morality on<br />

the part of men and women, especially in the more refined classes of<br />

society. Men are driven away at an early age from the society of<br />

women and thrown upon the society of each other o<strong>nl</strong>y--in schools,<br />

colleges, barracks, etc.; and thus they have concocted and cherished<br />

a wholly different standard of moral purity from that generally existing<br />

http://womhist.binghamton.edu/aoc/doc6.htm (2 of 4) [6/5/2005 8:51:08 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!