THE BODY 89the mind that inhabits it, suggesting a dysfunction of the mind/bodydualism that emphasizes the dividedness of human experience. Slapstickhistorian Alan Dale reads the beleaguered hero as a reconfiguration ofthe relationship between the mind and the body that has been a featureof conceptions of humanity since classical antiquity. ‘One of the centralelements of…theology,’ he writes,the debasing effect of the body on the soul—enables Christians toovercome this discord only by denying and finally getting rid ofthe body, whereas slapstick achieves accord here on earth by acomic concession to the body at its most traitorous. Both of thesestand in contrast to the pagan approach of the Olympic Games, inwhich athletes attempt to achieve a perfect union of body and will.These three ritualistic approaches form a gamut: Christianityseeks eternal triumph over physicality after life; Olympians seekby means of the body a temporal triumph that will be rememberedlong after the athlete’s prowess has faded; slapstick seeks atemporal acceptance of physicality by a cathartic exaggeration ofits very limitations.(Dale, 2000:14)As well as being a vicarious outlet for cruelty, then, the humour inslapstick may also help to reconcile us to a body that obstructs the willand insubordinately thwarts desire.As slapstick is where the body meets the world of things, it is suitablyfascinated with objects. By examining the identity and utility of thingsand playing with the space they occupy, their dimensions, properties,and cultural significance, the body’s relationship to the external world ismade strange. Typical gags might involve disproportionate sizes, theanimation of the inanimate, the slowing down or speeding up of events,the personification of objects, and the reversal or rejection of linearcause and effect that allows things to be re-contextualized or entirelyreused. This belongs to a rich tradition of clowning. The most popularroutines of the famous Regency comedian Joseph Grimaldi(1778–1837) were the ones where he turned cheeses into a coach, andproduced a hussar’s uniform out of a coal scuttle, a cloak, and a muff.The Swiss-born clown Charles Wettach, better known as Grock(1880–1959), speaks tellingly of his relationship to objects in hisautobiography: ‘Ever since I can remember,’ he wrote, ‘all kinds ofinanimate objects have had a way of looking at me reproachfully andwhispering to me in unguarded moments: “We have been waiting for
90 THE BODYyou…at last you’ve come…take us now, and turn us into somethingdifferent’” (quoted in Welsford, 1935:309). Laleen Jayamanne sees theclown’s ingenuity as ‘an unsevered link between perception andaction’, that amounts to the ability to think with the body rather than themore familiar coordinates of subject—object relations, resulting in ‘thecapacity to make correspondences, the perception of nonsensuoussimilarities across incommensurables’, such as eating an old shoe as if itwere a gourmet meal, as in Chaplin’s The Gold Rush (1925)(Jayamanne, 2001:189). The idea that the slapstick gag represents aninterruption of conventional knowledge is put forward by DonaldCrafton, who argues that the utility-turned-unpredictability of slapstickgags amounts to a rupture in the linear process of understanding. ‘Oneway to look at narrative’, he says,is to see it as a system for providing the spectator with sufficientknowledge to make causal links between represented events.According to this view, the gag’s status as an irreconcilabledifference becomes clear. Rather than provide knowledge,slapstick misdirects the viewer’s attention, and obfuscates thelinearity of cause-effect relations. Gags provide the opposite ofepistemological comprehension by the spectator. They areatemporal bursts of violence and/or hedonism that are asephemeral and as gratifying as the sight of someone’s pie-smittenface.(quoted in Jayamanne, 2001:185)Rather than taking events and shaping them into coherent order,slapstick events treat the world as if it were capricious, unpredictable,and suddenly explosive. To think of a gag as an ‘irreconcilabledifference’ is to emphasize its incompatibility with our understanding ofhow the world normally works. Slapstick, then, opens up the possibilityof the world becoming inhospitable and strange to us.A useful way to consider slapstick is through the work of HenriBergson. Bergson, as discussed in Chapter 1, believed that human beingsexist in a state of continual ambient awareness of the animated Vitalspirit’ of themselves and others, and that when a situation causes vitalityto be obscured and the ‘humanness’ of humans is lost or denuded,comedy is born from the sudden eclipse of life. ‘The comic’, he says, ‘isthat side of a person which most reveals his likeness to a thing, thataspect of human events which, through its peculiar inelasticity, conveysthe impression of pure mechanism, of automatism, of movement without
- Page 2 and 3:
COMEDYWhat is comedy? Andrew Stott
- Page 4 and 5:
iiiIrony by Claire ColebrookLiterat
- Page 6 and 7:
First published 2005by Routledge270
- Page 8 and 9:
The Grotesque 83Slapstick 87The Fem
- Page 10:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIn keeping with the
- Page 13 and 14:
2 INTRODUCTIONcomic’ is an identi
- Page 15 and 16:
4 INTRODUCTIONassumption being that
- Page 17 and 18:
6 INTRODUCTION‘Whenever they wax
- Page 19 and 20:
8 INTRODUCTIONmeans of opening up t
- Page 21 and 22:
10 INTRODUCTIONJokes therefore emer
- Page 23 and 24:
12 INTRODUCTIONexperience itself as
- Page 25 and 26:
14 INTRODUCTIONrelegation in the hi
- Page 27 and 28:
16 INTRODUCTION
- Page 29 and 30:
18 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWhile there
- Page 31 and 32:
20 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYin the cont
- Page 33 and 34:
22 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWith the ri
- Page 35 and 36:
24 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYother’ (B
- Page 37 and 38:
26 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYvictory pro
- Page 39 and 40:
28 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYSPRINGTIME
- Page 41 and 42:
30 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYreduction t
- Page 43 and 44:
32 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYlocation fo
- Page 45 and 46:
34 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYbut this ap
- Page 47 and 48:
36 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYand also a
- Page 49 and 50: 38 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMY
- Page 51 and 52: 40 COMIC IDENTITYnows, changing voi
- Page 53 and 54: 42 COMIC IDENTITYwalks of life to a
- Page 55 and 56: 44 COMIC IDENTITYdisease. From this
- Page 57 and 58: 46 COMIC IDENTITYineffable folly of
- Page 59 and 60: 48 COMIC IDENTITYdancing, juggling,
- Page 61 and 62: 50 COMIC IDENTITYThe trickster has
- Page 63 and 64: 52 COMIC IDENTITYShakespeare, fairi
- Page 65 and 66: 54 COMIC IDENTITYCastiglione’s Th
- Page 67 and 68: 56 COMIC IDENTITYway of seeing the
- Page 69 and 70: 58 COMIC IDENTITY1990:248). Not onl
- Page 71 and 72: 60 GENDER AND SEXUALITYignoring tab
- Page 73 and 74: 62 GENDER AND SEXUALITYand alluring
- Page 75 and 76: 64 GENDER AND SEXUALITYunderstand q
- Page 77 and 78: 66 GENDER AND SEXUALITYplaying Rosa
- Page 79 and 80: 68 GENDER AND SEXUALITYfinancial su
- Page 81 and 82: 70 GENDER AND SEXUALITYIf the anato
- Page 83 and 84: 72 GENDER AND SEXUALITYThe represen
- Page 85 and 86: 74 GENDER AND SEXUALITYbeen redefin
- Page 87 and 88: 76 GENDER AND SEXUALITYconverse wit
- Page 89 and 90: 78 GENDER AND SEXUALITYsignificance
- Page 91 and 92: 80 THE BODYBEAUTY AND ABJECTIONIn W
- Page 93 and 94: 82 THE BODYOne idea that may help u
- Page 95 and 96: 84 THE BODYexistence in the face of
- Page 97 and 98: 86 THE BODYThey are healthily scept
- Page 99: 88 THE BODYFirst, movie performers
- Page 103 and 104: 92 THE BODYin a department store, t
- Page 105 and 106: 94 THE BODYWomen have been systemat
- Page 107 and 108: 96 THE BODYand the pair’s drunken
- Page 109 and 110: 98 POLITICSseems to assume—came t
- Page 111 and 112: 100 POLITICScitizens all insulted i
- Page 113 and 114: 102 POLITICSSecretary Tessa Jowell
- Page 115 and 116: 104 POLITICSIt is the stated positi
- Page 117 and 118: 106 POLITICSWhat should I do in Rom
- Page 119 and 120: 108 POLITICSdifficult crowds for wh
- Page 121 and 122: 110 POLITICSalmost laughed, it seem
- Page 123 and 124: 112 POLITICSsatisfied by Price’s
- Page 125 and 126: 114 POLITICSself-centredness of the
- Page 127 and 128: 116 POLITICSwho, in their 1944 essa
- Page 129 and 130: 118 POLITICS(Ezrahi, 2001:307). Rut
- Page 131 and 132: 120 POLITICS
- Page 133 and 134: 122 LAUGHTERevidence for his sense
- Page 135 and 136: 124 LAUGHTERdevils to expel, there
- Page 137 and 138: 126 LAUGHTERand the meane that make
- Page 139 and 140: 128 LAUGHTERHere we find the Christ
- Page 141 and 142: 130 LAUGHTERof mutual relation from
- Page 143 and 144: 132 LAUGHTER‘laughter naturally r
- Page 145 and 146: 134 LAUGHTERceiling, it started lit
- Page 147 and 148: 136 LAUGHTERdeferred. For Nancy, th
- Page 149 and 150: 138 LAUGHTERsatisfy their desires a
- Page 151 and 152:
140 CONCLUSIONhuman imperfection. W
- Page 153 and 154:
142 CONCLUSION
- Page 155 and 156:
144 GLOSSARYcenturies. Commedia del
- Page 157 and 158:
146 GLOSSARYto problematize the ide
- Page 159 and 160:
148 GLOSSARY
- Page 161 and 162:
150 FURTHER READINGAn extremely acc
- Page 163 and 164:
152 BIBLIOGRAPHYErickson and Coppel
- Page 165 and 166:
154 BIBLIOGRAPHYDouglas, Mary (1975
- Page 167 and 168:
156 BIBLIOGRAPHYContexts and Critic
- Page 169 and 170:
158 BIBLIOGRAPHY——(1987), ‘Wi
- Page 171 and 172:
160 BIBLIOGRAPHYSynott, Anthony (19
- Page 173 and 174:
162 INDEXCavell, Stanley 87-3Chapli
- Page 175 and 176:
164 INDEXmarriage 70-77;in British