INTRODUCTION 5and the lines of social division and hierarchy be graphically representedin terms of seating and participation. A sense of collective involvementin the issues of government might also be raised through the debatesaired in plays (Palmer, 1994:31–32).This leads us to a further question asked of comedy: what purposedoes it serve, and what, if anything, is its social function orphilosophical value, apart from giving pleasure? While the comedy ofAristophanes (c. 448–380 BC) sustained an overt political and satiricalcommentary, comic drama was encouraged to move away from currentaffairs at an early stage in its development. Aristotle tells us that it wasCrates (active 450 BC) who ‘first abandoned the form of a lampoon andbegan to construct universalized stories and plots’; and by the time ofMenander (c. 342–c. 291 BC) nearly a century later, comedy had ceasedto intervene in the issues of government, at least explicitly (Aristotle,1996:9). Instead, comedy was commended for its realistic representationof the human condition, famously moving the early Alexandrine scholarAristophanes of Byzantium to ask, ‘O Menander and Life/Which of youis imitating which?’ (Segal, 2001:153). By the fourth century AD, theidea of comedy as an instructive literary form takes shape in the work ofDonatus, a grammarian who taught at Rome, and who wroteenormously influential remarks on the comedies of Terence, works hewould have never seen performed and would have only known as texts.Under these sterile conditions, Donatus declared comedy to beessentially didactic, mirroring everyday life and schooling us in practicalethics. He also emphasized the academic qualities of comedy, arguingthat good comedy should be built according to sound rhetoricalprinciples (Herrick, 1950:65). Donatus’ scholarly and moralistic methodfortified comedy with some of the technical respectability of tragedy,and the principal arguments of comic theory from the Renaissanceonwards are based on his ideas. That its primary function is corrective isargued in 1698, for example, by William Congreve in response to theclergyman Jeremy Collier’s attack on him in particular and theatre ingeneral. ‘Men are to be laughed out of their vices in comedy’, he wrote.The business of comedy is to delight as well as to instruct; and asvicious people are made ashamed of their follies and faults by seeingthem exposed in a ridiculous manner, so are good people at once bothwarned and diverted at their expense’ (Congreve, 1997a: 515). Twocenturies later, in his ‘Essay on Comedy’ (1877), the playwright GeorgeMeredith made a similar point, although metaphysically enlarging it bypersonifying comedy as a benign spirit monitoring human behaviour.
6 INTRODUCTION‘Whenever they wax out of proportion, overblown, affected, pretentious,bombastical, hypocritical, pedantic, fantastically delicate’, he writes,whenever it sees them self-deceived or hoodwinked, given to runriot in idolatries, drifting into vanities, congregating inabsurdities, planning short-sightedly, plotting dementedly;whenever they are at variance with their professions, and violatethe unwritten but perceptible laws binding them in considerationone to another; whenever they offend sound reason, fair justice;are false in humility or mined with conceit…the Spirit overheadwill look humanely malign, and cast an oblique light on them,followed by volleys of silvery laughter. That is the Comic Spirit.(Meredith, 1980:48)The extent to which we have been profitably instructed, or productivelychastised by this ‘humanely malign’ creature is deeply debatable,especially in the present day.In the twentieth century, critics have been less keen to subscribe tocomedy’s didacticism. Some, like Maurice Charney, see a centralmethodological absence in contemporary discussions of the form thatleaves us with ‘no common assumptions and no set of conventions bywhich we could agree on how to speak about comedy’ (Charney,1978:vii–viii). More assertive critics, like Harry Levin, see comedy as aconflict between the emotions of joviality and sobriety, a ‘perennial warof the laughers against the non-laughers’, of playboys against killjoys,‘locked in an eternal battle of world views’ (Levin, 1987:40). For ErichSegal, the history of Western comedy plots a long line of descent fromthe euphoric highs of ‘Aristophanic triumph’ to the resignation of the‘theatre of inadequacy’, represented by the work of Samuel Beckett.According to this thesis, vigorous expressions of life begin to fade andbecome more complicated and contingent as history and experienceinstruct us in cynicism, and boisterous, optimistic comic forms arerendered increasingly untenable. Beckett’s Waiting for Godot (1953)epitomizes comedy’s fate:The drama will have no happy ending. Indeed, it will have noending at all. There will be no revel, renewal, or rejuvenation. Forwhatever Godot may represent, whether salvation or erotic rebirth,one thing is clear. The traditional happy ending is no longerpossible—because comedy is dead.(Segal, 2001:452)
- Page 2 and 3: COMEDYWhat is comedy? Andrew Stott
- Page 4 and 5: iiiIrony by Claire ColebrookLiterat
- Page 6 and 7: First published 2005by Routledge270
- Page 8 and 9: The Grotesque 83Slapstick 87The Fem
- Page 10: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIn keeping with the
- Page 13 and 14: 2 INTRODUCTIONcomic’ is an identi
- Page 15: 4 INTRODUCTIONassumption being that
- Page 19 and 20: 8 INTRODUCTIONmeans of opening up t
- Page 21 and 22: 10 INTRODUCTIONJokes therefore emer
- Page 23 and 24: 12 INTRODUCTIONexperience itself as
- Page 25 and 26: 14 INTRODUCTIONrelegation in the hi
- Page 27 and 28: 16 INTRODUCTION
- Page 29 and 30: 18 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWhile there
- Page 31 and 32: 20 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYin the cont
- Page 33 and 34: 22 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWith the ri
- Page 35 and 36: 24 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYother’ (B
- Page 37 and 38: 26 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYvictory pro
- Page 39 and 40: 28 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYSPRINGTIME
- Page 41 and 42: 30 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYreduction t
- Page 43 and 44: 32 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYlocation fo
- Page 45 and 46: 34 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYbut this ap
- Page 47 and 48: 36 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYand also a
- Page 49 and 50: 38 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMY
- Page 51 and 52: 40 COMIC IDENTITYnows, changing voi
- Page 53 and 54: 42 COMIC IDENTITYwalks of life to a
- Page 55 and 56: 44 COMIC IDENTITYdisease. From this
- Page 57 and 58: 46 COMIC IDENTITYineffable folly of
- Page 59 and 60: 48 COMIC IDENTITYdancing, juggling,
- Page 61 and 62: 50 COMIC IDENTITYThe trickster has
- Page 63 and 64: 52 COMIC IDENTITYShakespeare, fairi
- Page 65 and 66: 54 COMIC IDENTITYCastiglione’s Th
- Page 67 and 68:
56 COMIC IDENTITYway of seeing the
- Page 69 and 70:
58 COMIC IDENTITY1990:248). Not onl
- Page 71 and 72:
60 GENDER AND SEXUALITYignoring tab
- Page 73 and 74:
62 GENDER AND SEXUALITYand alluring
- Page 75 and 76:
64 GENDER AND SEXUALITYunderstand q
- Page 77 and 78:
66 GENDER AND SEXUALITYplaying Rosa
- Page 79 and 80:
68 GENDER AND SEXUALITYfinancial su
- Page 81 and 82:
70 GENDER AND SEXUALITYIf the anato
- Page 83 and 84:
72 GENDER AND SEXUALITYThe represen
- Page 85 and 86:
74 GENDER AND SEXUALITYbeen redefin
- Page 87 and 88:
76 GENDER AND SEXUALITYconverse wit
- Page 89 and 90:
78 GENDER AND SEXUALITYsignificance
- Page 91 and 92:
80 THE BODYBEAUTY AND ABJECTIONIn W
- Page 93 and 94:
82 THE BODYOne idea that may help u
- Page 95 and 96:
84 THE BODYexistence in the face of
- Page 97 and 98:
86 THE BODYThey are healthily scept
- Page 99 and 100:
88 THE BODYFirst, movie performers
- Page 101 and 102:
90 THE BODYyou…at last you’ve c
- Page 103 and 104:
92 THE BODYin a department store, t
- Page 105 and 106:
94 THE BODYWomen have been systemat
- Page 107 and 108:
96 THE BODYand the pair’s drunken
- Page 109 and 110:
98 POLITICSseems to assume—came t
- Page 111 and 112:
100 POLITICScitizens all insulted i
- Page 113 and 114:
102 POLITICSSecretary Tessa Jowell
- Page 115 and 116:
104 POLITICSIt is the stated positi
- Page 117 and 118:
106 POLITICSWhat should I do in Rom
- Page 119 and 120:
108 POLITICSdifficult crowds for wh
- Page 121 and 122:
110 POLITICSalmost laughed, it seem
- Page 123 and 124:
112 POLITICSsatisfied by Price’s
- Page 125 and 126:
114 POLITICSself-centredness of the
- Page 127 and 128:
116 POLITICSwho, in their 1944 essa
- Page 129 and 130:
118 POLITICS(Ezrahi, 2001:307). Rut
- Page 131 and 132:
120 POLITICS
- Page 133 and 134:
122 LAUGHTERevidence for his sense
- Page 135 and 136:
124 LAUGHTERdevils to expel, there
- Page 137 and 138:
126 LAUGHTERand the meane that make
- Page 139 and 140:
128 LAUGHTERHere we find the Christ
- Page 141 and 142:
130 LAUGHTERof mutual relation from
- Page 143 and 144:
132 LAUGHTER‘laughter naturally r
- Page 145 and 146:
134 LAUGHTERceiling, it started lit
- Page 147 and 148:
136 LAUGHTERdeferred. For Nancy, th
- Page 149 and 150:
138 LAUGHTERsatisfy their desires a
- Page 151 and 152:
140 CONCLUSIONhuman imperfection. W
- Page 153 and 154:
142 CONCLUSION
- Page 155 and 156:
144 GLOSSARYcenturies. Commedia del
- Page 157 and 158:
146 GLOSSARYto problematize the ide
- Page 159 and 160:
148 GLOSSARY
- Page 161 and 162:
150 FURTHER READINGAn extremely acc
- Page 163 and 164:
152 BIBLIOGRAPHYErickson and Coppel
- Page 165 and 166:
154 BIBLIOGRAPHYDouglas, Mary (1975
- Page 167 and 168:
156 BIBLIOGRAPHYContexts and Critic
- Page 169 and 170:
158 BIBLIOGRAPHY——(1987), ‘Wi
- Page 171 and 172:
160 BIBLIOGRAPHYSynott, Anthony (19
- Page 173 and 174:
162 INDEXCavell, Stanley 87-3Chapli
- Page 175 and 176:
164 INDEXmarriage 70-77;in British