THE BODY 81Concomitant with the idealization of beauty is a cultural insistence onmastering the body, and making it conform to ideas of deportment andappropriate behaviour, regulating its functions and odours according towhat is considered acceptable, and what must be suppressed as crude orbestial. Norbert Elias, whose ground-breaking work The CivilizingProcess (1939) demonstrated how a concept of the body, and theappropriate way of managing it, lay at the heart of ideas like refinementand civilization, argues that one of the principal means of governingbodily manners has been through the introduction of shame. Feelingashamed, or developing a heightened sense of delicacy aboutnakedness, table manners, flatulence, and other ‘unpleasant’ biologicalfacts, requires disciplining bodily functions to fit the codes of etiquetteand avoid being shunned. As the rules of bodily discipline becomeincreasingly refined, a parallel sense of the primitive and brutish iscreated in its wake:The greater or lesser discomfort we feel toward people whodiscuss or mention their bodily functions more openly, whoconceal and restrain these functions less than we do, is one of thedominant feelings expressed in the judgement ‘barbaric’ or‘uncivilized’. Such, then, is the nature of ‘barbarism and itsdiscontents’, or, in more precise and less evaluative terms, thediscontent with the different structure of affects, the differentstandard of repugnance which preceded our own and is itsprecondition.(Elias, 1978:58–59)By demonstrating our disapproval of standards lower than our own weconstruct a category of barbarism against which we guarantee ourelevated level of civility.It is against these ideals of beauty and manners that physical comedyis produced. Put simply, comedy strategically bypasses civility to returnus to our body, emphasizing our proximity to the animals, reminding usof our corporeality and momentarily shattering the apparently globalimperatives of manners and beauty. Obscene, sexual, or taboo humouris predicated on an understanding of the socially tolerable body that itperverts in order to provoke laughter. Yet this does not amount to anauthentic moment in which we are granted a genuine and unmediatedexperience of our material selves, but rather a discovery of the bodythrough the contravention of civility. Out of the concept of bodily order,then, emerges the comic body.
82 THE BODYOne idea that may help us understand the place of the body incomedy is the notion of ‘abjection’. This concept, developed in its mostfamiliar form in the psychoanalytic criticism of Julia Kristeva,contemplates those things which repulse or nauseate the subject butwhich do not utterly belong outside him or her. In his study of abjectionin stand-up comedy, John Limon describes it as ‘a psychic worrying ofthose aspects of oneself that one cannot be rid of, that seem, but are notquite, alienable—for example, blood, urine, feces, nails, and the corpse’(Limon, 2000:4). The abject is an ever-present site of horror andfascination that pollutes the self, because the self partly consists of it.This is most clearly characterized by the actual body, which willeventually die. As Kristeva writes:The corpse, seen without God and outside of science, is the utmostof abjection. It is death infecting life. Abject. It is somethingrejected from which one does not part, from which one does notprotect oneself as from an object. Imaginary uncanniness and realthreat, it beckons to us and ends up engulfing us.(Kristeva, 1982:4)We see here that the abject is a physical reality that cannot bedefeated through the simple application of additional layers of culturalrefinement. In Limon’s terms, the abject ‘worries’ at us, refusing to besublimated, never entirely forgotten and implicated in one’s veryexistence. Abjection may explain why ‘sick’, morbid, or scatologicalhumour, or comedy that involves violence and pain, is so popular. Suchexamples go straight to the worry, addressing the inescapable bodily factsof existence that are elided by manners. We know that medievalBiblical drama often incorporated elements of farce and burlesque,styles that use violence, physical predicaments, and scatology in theircomedy, as if indicating a desire to raise the troubling issues of finitudein the presence of God. By foregrounding the functions of what Bakhtincalls the ‘lower bodily stratum’, the genitals, the anus, urine, excrement,and excrescences, and invoking the abject body as a risible concept tobe laughed at rather than feared, its power of horror may be lifted andour fear of decay and degeneration alleviated. But the comedy ofabjection is also a confirmation of the frail foundation of civility,locating subjectivity within material existence, acknowledging theweakness of the body and the omnipotence of filth, and raising themesthat are impermissible elsewhere.
- Page 2 and 3:
COMEDYWhat is comedy? Andrew Stott
- Page 4 and 5:
iiiIrony by Claire ColebrookLiterat
- Page 6 and 7:
First published 2005by Routledge270
- Page 8 and 9:
The Grotesque 83Slapstick 87The Fem
- Page 10:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIn keeping with the
- Page 13 and 14:
2 INTRODUCTIONcomic’ is an identi
- Page 15 and 16:
4 INTRODUCTIONassumption being that
- Page 17 and 18:
6 INTRODUCTION‘Whenever they wax
- Page 19 and 20:
8 INTRODUCTIONmeans of opening up t
- Page 21 and 22:
10 INTRODUCTIONJokes therefore emer
- Page 23 and 24:
12 INTRODUCTIONexperience itself as
- Page 25 and 26:
14 INTRODUCTIONrelegation in the hi
- Page 27 and 28:
16 INTRODUCTION
- Page 29 and 30:
18 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWhile there
- Page 31 and 32:
20 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYin the cont
- Page 33 and 34:
22 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWith the ri
- Page 35 and 36:
24 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYother’ (B
- Page 37 and 38:
26 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYvictory pro
- Page 39 and 40:
28 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYSPRINGTIME
- Page 41 and 42: 30 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYreduction t
- Page 43 and 44: 32 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYlocation fo
- Page 45 and 46: 34 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYbut this ap
- Page 47 and 48: 36 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYand also a
- Page 49 and 50: 38 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMY
- Page 51 and 52: 40 COMIC IDENTITYnows, changing voi
- Page 53 and 54: 42 COMIC IDENTITYwalks of life to a
- Page 55 and 56: 44 COMIC IDENTITYdisease. From this
- Page 57 and 58: 46 COMIC IDENTITYineffable folly of
- Page 59 and 60: 48 COMIC IDENTITYdancing, juggling,
- Page 61 and 62: 50 COMIC IDENTITYThe trickster has
- Page 63 and 64: 52 COMIC IDENTITYShakespeare, fairi
- Page 65 and 66: 54 COMIC IDENTITYCastiglione’s Th
- Page 67 and 68: 56 COMIC IDENTITYway of seeing the
- Page 69 and 70: 58 COMIC IDENTITY1990:248). Not onl
- Page 71 and 72: 60 GENDER AND SEXUALITYignoring tab
- Page 73 and 74: 62 GENDER AND SEXUALITYand alluring
- Page 75 and 76: 64 GENDER AND SEXUALITYunderstand q
- Page 77 and 78: 66 GENDER AND SEXUALITYplaying Rosa
- Page 79 and 80: 68 GENDER AND SEXUALITYfinancial su
- Page 81 and 82: 70 GENDER AND SEXUALITYIf the anato
- Page 83 and 84: 72 GENDER AND SEXUALITYThe represen
- Page 85 and 86: 74 GENDER AND SEXUALITYbeen redefin
- Page 87 and 88: 76 GENDER AND SEXUALITYconverse wit
- Page 89 and 90: 78 GENDER AND SEXUALITYsignificance
- Page 91: 80 THE BODYBEAUTY AND ABJECTIONIn W
- Page 95 and 96: 84 THE BODYexistence in the face of
- Page 97 and 98: 86 THE BODYThey are healthily scept
- Page 99 and 100: 88 THE BODYFirst, movie performers
- Page 101 and 102: 90 THE BODYyou…at last you’ve c
- Page 103 and 104: 92 THE BODYin a department store, t
- Page 105 and 106: 94 THE BODYWomen have been systemat
- Page 107 and 108: 96 THE BODYand the pair’s drunken
- Page 109 and 110: 98 POLITICSseems to assume—came t
- Page 111 and 112: 100 POLITICScitizens all insulted i
- Page 113 and 114: 102 POLITICSSecretary Tessa Jowell
- Page 115 and 116: 104 POLITICSIt is the stated positi
- Page 117 and 118: 106 POLITICSWhat should I do in Rom
- Page 119 and 120: 108 POLITICSdifficult crowds for wh
- Page 121 and 122: 110 POLITICSalmost laughed, it seem
- Page 123 and 124: 112 POLITICSsatisfied by Price’s
- Page 125 and 126: 114 POLITICSself-centredness of the
- Page 127 and 128: 116 POLITICSwho, in their 1944 essa
- Page 129 and 130: 118 POLITICS(Ezrahi, 2001:307). Rut
- Page 131 and 132: 120 POLITICS
- Page 133 and 134: 122 LAUGHTERevidence for his sense
- Page 135 and 136: 124 LAUGHTERdevils to expel, there
- Page 137 and 138: 126 LAUGHTERand the meane that make
- Page 139 and 140: 128 LAUGHTERHere we find the Christ
- Page 141 and 142: 130 LAUGHTERof mutual relation from
- Page 143 and 144:
132 LAUGHTER‘laughter naturally r
- Page 145 and 146:
134 LAUGHTERceiling, it started lit
- Page 147 and 148:
136 LAUGHTERdeferred. For Nancy, th
- Page 149 and 150:
138 LAUGHTERsatisfy their desires a
- Page 151 and 152:
140 CONCLUSIONhuman imperfection. W
- Page 153 and 154:
142 CONCLUSION
- Page 155 and 156:
144 GLOSSARYcenturies. Commedia del
- Page 157 and 158:
146 GLOSSARYto problematize the ide
- Page 159 and 160:
148 GLOSSARY
- Page 161 and 162:
150 FURTHER READINGAn extremely acc
- Page 163 and 164:
152 BIBLIOGRAPHYErickson and Coppel
- Page 165 and 166:
154 BIBLIOGRAPHYDouglas, Mary (1975
- Page 167 and 168:
156 BIBLIOGRAPHYContexts and Critic
- Page 169 and 170:
158 BIBLIOGRAPHY——(1987), ‘Wi
- Page 171 and 172:
160 BIBLIOGRAPHYSynott, Anthony (19
- Page 173 and 174:
162 INDEXCavell, Stanley 87-3Chapli
- Page 175 and 176:
164 INDEXmarriage 70-77;in British