COMIC IDENTITY 41provides us with the set of comic stereotypes that have provided theblueprint for comic characterization from the renaissance to the present.New Comedy is derived from the work of the Greek dramatistMenander, whose plays, up until the discovery of papyrus fragments in1905, were known only through the adaptations and embellishments ofthe Roman comic authors Plautus and Terence. Considering theenormous impact Menander has had on comedy, very little is knownabout him. He was an Athenian, who according to one account, wrote108 plays, but had only modest success during his lifetime, and waseclipsed by other authors of New Comedy, of whom even less isknown. His standing was completely revised in later antiquity,however, and he was prized for the quality of his plots and theexcellence of his characters. Whereas Aristophanic Old Comedy dealtwith political institutions, public figures, and fantastical situations,Menandrine New Comedy was concerned with the intimate themes ofdomestic and private life. New Comedy dramatized the lives of citizensrather than gods and politicians and was interested in romance, sexualdesire, the circulation of money, and the imposition of patriarchal order.New Comedy was also the first to conclude with the promise of marriage.Concomitantly, its repertoire of stock characters emerges from thehousehold and orbits around this central domestic space. Menander,Plautus, and Terence populate their plays with variations on the samebasic character types: the profligate or impractical young man; thesenex, or parent; the matronly wife; the meretrix, or accomplishedcourtesan; the clever slave; the nervous parasite; the vulnerable maiden;and the miles gloriosus, or swaggering soldier. These characters reflectMenander’s absorption of the philosophy of Theophrastus (c. 370–c.288 BC), head of the Peripatetic School after Aristotle, and the authorof Characters, thirty sketches of human types embodying particularfaults and follies. Like stage comedy itself, these amount to possibly themost resilient character types in all Western fiction, with severalremaining, in the words of Northrop Frye, ‘practically unchanged fortwenty-five centuries’ (Frye, 1953:271).New Comedy is generally considered to be a more conservative formthan its Aristophanic predecessor, reflecting a change in the context ofGreek drama from the fourth to the third centuries BC. The shift inemphasis from the public arena to life indoors was probably a responseto Athens’s decreasing political importance, and the fact that itsleadership was largely supported by foreign powers, resulting in a lossof the political immediacy that motivated Aristophanes. Audiences mayhave also changed: as the subsidies which allowed people from all
42 COMIC IDENTITYwalks of life to attend the theatre disappeared, a more resolutelymiddle-class audience came to dominate. Their taste, suggests GeoffreyArnott, was escapist, interested less in the ‘recurring disasters of life’and more in stories in which problems ‘always resolved in the inevitablehappy ending which celebrated and cemented family unity’ (quoted inKonstan, 1995:167). Just as its characterization was formulaic, so wereplots, featuring variations on familiar themes. Roman comedy dealsrepeatedly with the forbidden love of a young man for a prostitute,slave, or otherwise ineligible woman, and the complications of theirromance in the face of fierce parental disapproval before finally,through some contortion of the plot, a recognition scene reveals her trueidentity as a citizen. ‘With this device, the conflicting claims of privatepassion and social responsibility are neatly reconciled, for thewaywardness of desire proves to be illusory. The impulse that aspires tothe forbidden is domesticated, gratified without danger to publicconvention, and thus the threat to the city-state ideal of a closedconjugal group is averted’ (Konstan, 1983:24–25). Given that thesenarratives tend towards the reinforcement of family ties and themaintenance of dynastic status, supporting the privilege of a raciallyhomogenous group in an ethnically diverse empire, stereotypicalcharacterization might be seen as a reassuring ploy that confirms ahegemonic view of the world, and appeals to the comprehensivesystems of taxonomy and categorization that existed in Romanintellectual life. As Maurice Charney writes: ‘Comic conventionpostulates a society that is rigidly hierarchical. By the laws of decorum,carefully formulated by such Roman rhetoricians as Cicero andQuintilian, different social classes have their prescribed styles, both ofmanners and of speech’ (Charney, 1978:51). Representing a range ofclearly delineated social types supports a concept of order that assertsits totality by claiming to predict, know, and catalogue the behaviour ofall kinds and types of people. Watching a parade of stereotypes,therefore, affords the comfort of confirming an audience’s prejudices.As previously discussed, the reputations of Terence and Plautus wereupheld during the medieval and renaissance periods by scholars whovalued them primarily as examples of good style. The basic structure ofNew Comedy had been preserved in the Italian renaissance form knownas the commedia erudita, or ‘learned’ comedy, of which Niccolò deiMachiavelli’s La Mandragola (c. 1520) is an example. Italian dramahas some influence on the structure of English playwriting throughoutthe 1580s and 1590s, combined with a group of plays known as‘prodigal son’ dramas, another fashionable continental model that
- Page 2 and 3: COMEDYWhat is comedy? Andrew Stott
- Page 4 and 5: iiiIrony by Claire ColebrookLiterat
- Page 6 and 7: First published 2005by Routledge270
- Page 8 and 9: The Grotesque 83Slapstick 87The Fem
- Page 10: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIn keeping with the
- Page 13 and 14: 2 INTRODUCTIONcomic’ is an identi
- Page 15 and 16: 4 INTRODUCTIONassumption being that
- Page 17 and 18: 6 INTRODUCTION‘Whenever they wax
- Page 19 and 20: 8 INTRODUCTIONmeans of opening up t
- Page 21 and 22: 10 INTRODUCTIONJokes therefore emer
- Page 23 and 24: 12 INTRODUCTIONexperience itself as
- Page 25 and 26: 14 INTRODUCTIONrelegation in the hi
- Page 27 and 28: 16 INTRODUCTION
- Page 29 and 30: 18 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWhile there
- Page 31 and 32: 20 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYin the cont
- Page 33 and 34: 22 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWith the ri
- Page 35 and 36: 24 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYother’ (B
- Page 37 and 38: 26 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYvictory pro
- Page 39 and 40: 28 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYSPRINGTIME
- Page 41 and 42: 30 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYreduction t
- Page 43 and 44: 32 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYlocation fo
- Page 45 and 46: 34 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYbut this ap
- Page 47 and 48: 36 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYand also a
- Page 49 and 50: 38 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMY
- Page 51: 40 COMIC IDENTITYnows, changing voi
- Page 55 and 56: 44 COMIC IDENTITYdisease. From this
- Page 57 and 58: 46 COMIC IDENTITYineffable folly of
- Page 59 and 60: 48 COMIC IDENTITYdancing, juggling,
- Page 61 and 62: 50 COMIC IDENTITYThe trickster has
- Page 63 and 64: 52 COMIC IDENTITYShakespeare, fairi
- Page 65 and 66: 54 COMIC IDENTITYCastiglione’s Th
- Page 67 and 68: 56 COMIC IDENTITYway of seeing the
- Page 69 and 70: 58 COMIC IDENTITY1990:248). Not onl
- Page 71 and 72: 60 GENDER AND SEXUALITYignoring tab
- Page 73 and 74: 62 GENDER AND SEXUALITYand alluring
- Page 75 and 76: 64 GENDER AND SEXUALITYunderstand q
- Page 77 and 78: 66 GENDER AND SEXUALITYplaying Rosa
- Page 79 and 80: 68 GENDER AND SEXUALITYfinancial su
- Page 81 and 82: 70 GENDER AND SEXUALITYIf the anato
- Page 83 and 84: 72 GENDER AND SEXUALITYThe represen
- Page 85 and 86: 74 GENDER AND SEXUALITYbeen redefin
- Page 87 and 88: 76 GENDER AND SEXUALITYconverse wit
- Page 89 and 90: 78 GENDER AND SEXUALITYsignificance
- Page 91 and 92: 80 THE BODYBEAUTY AND ABJECTIONIn W
- Page 93 and 94: 82 THE BODYOne idea that may help u
- Page 95 and 96: 84 THE BODYexistence in the face of
- Page 97 and 98: 86 THE BODYThey are healthily scept
- Page 99 and 100: 88 THE BODYFirst, movie performers
- Page 101 and 102: 90 THE BODYyou…at last you’ve c
- Page 103 and 104:
92 THE BODYin a department store, t
- Page 105 and 106:
94 THE BODYWomen have been systemat
- Page 107 and 108:
96 THE BODYand the pair’s drunken
- Page 109 and 110:
98 POLITICSseems to assume—came t
- Page 111 and 112:
100 POLITICScitizens all insulted i
- Page 113 and 114:
102 POLITICSSecretary Tessa Jowell
- Page 115 and 116:
104 POLITICSIt is the stated positi
- Page 117 and 118:
106 POLITICSWhat should I do in Rom
- Page 119 and 120:
108 POLITICSdifficult crowds for wh
- Page 121 and 122:
110 POLITICSalmost laughed, it seem
- Page 123 and 124:
112 POLITICSsatisfied by Price’s
- Page 125 and 126:
114 POLITICSself-centredness of the
- Page 127 and 128:
116 POLITICSwho, in their 1944 essa
- Page 129 and 130:
118 POLITICS(Ezrahi, 2001:307). Rut
- Page 131 and 132:
120 POLITICS
- Page 133 and 134:
122 LAUGHTERevidence for his sense
- Page 135 and 136:
124 LAUGHTERdevils to expel, there
- Page 137 and 138:
126 LAUGHTERand the meane that make
- Page 139 and 140:
128 LAUGHTERHere we find the Christ
- Page 141 and 142:
130 LAUGHTERof mutual relation from
- Page 143 and 144:
132 LAUGHTER‘laughter naturally r
- Page 145 and 146:
134 LAUGHTERceiling, it started lit
- Page 147 and 148:
136 LAUGHTERdeferred. For Nancy, th
- Page 149 and 150:
138 LAUGHTERsatisfy their desires a
- Page 151 and 152:
140 CONCLUSIONhuman imperfection. W
- Page 153 and 154:
142 CONCLUSION
- Page 155 and 156:
144 GLOSSARYcenturies. Commedia del
- Page 157 and 158:
146 GLOSSARYto problematize the ide
- Page 159 and 160:
148 GLOSSARY
- Page 161 and 162:
150 FURTHER READINGAn extremely acc
- Page 163 and 164:
152 BIBLIOGRAPHYErickson and Coppel
- Page 165 and 166:
154 BIBLIOGRAPHYDouglas, Mary (1975
- Page 167 and 168:
156 BIBLIOGRAPHYContexts and Critic
- Page 169 and 170:
158 BIBLIOGRAPHY——(1987), ‘Wi
- Page 171 and 172:
160 BIBLIOGRAPHYSynott, Anthony (19
- Page 173 and 174:
162 INDEXCavell, Stanley 87-3Chapli
- Page 175 and 176:
164 INDEXmarriage 70-77;in British