2COMIC IDENTITYTwo babies were born on the same day at the same hospital.They lay there and looked at each other. Their familiescame and took them away. Eighty years later, by a bizarrecoincidence, they lay in the same hospital, on theirdeathbeds, next to each other. One of them looked at theother and said, ‘So. What did you think?’Steven WrightIn Woody Allen’s film Zelig (1983), the title character has a desire tobelong so acute that he physically transforms himself into the likenessof whoever he is with. He soon comes to the attention of a baffledmedical establishment, and, through the help of a frenzied press thatdubs him ‘the human chameleon’, becomes the biggest celebrity inAmerica. Troops of people are brought to meet him and each time hemimics their appearance, turning into a Rabbi, a 300-pound overeater,an African-American musician, or a Frenchman. While Zelig plays withkey American issues, most obviously the immigrant experience and thestruggle of assimilation, it also focuses a recurrent theme of comedy:the nature and limits of identity. Leonard Zelig is so shy and selfeffacingthat he is pathologically driven to assume the identities ofothers. This involves not only absurd physical transformations, but alsopresents an image of failed interiority, of a man who is a reflectivesurface. Many comic characters might be said to play on our fears ofbeing incomplete humans through their failures of self-awareness orinability to reflect on the nature of experience. Comic characters aretraditionally one-dimensional in the sense that they are apparentlyunable to learn and change. Bugs Bunny, for example, is madly funny,anarchic, transgressive, and dangerous, and completely incapable ofreflecting on his actions. Bugs lives in a perpetual series of excitable
40 COMIC IDENTITYnows, changing voice, costume, or tactics within seconds. What makeshim funny is the weightlessness of his character, the fact that he is notanchored within an orthodox system of selfhood or responsibility. InRoman New Comedy, character types are so rigidly defined that theirbehaviours are entirely predictable within given situations. The miserwill always be miserly, and the braggart will always boast. In this case,comic identity is derived from a sense of atrophied consciousness. In bothexamples, human identity is stripped of its subtlety or ambiguity,leaving only monstrous activity. While individual comic characters areinfinitely various, it is possible to identify certain features of thecategories to which they belong. This chapter will consider thereasoning behind types of comic character, beginning with the mostimportant, distinct personality types.STEREOTYPESAs we know, traditional comedy is largely plot driven, moving towardsritualistic resolutions such as feasts, marriages, or revelations. Comiccharacterization is usually subordinate to the demands of plot, andtherefore more effectively realized with stereotypes and onedimensionalcharacters than anything approaching the realistic portrayalof human emotions. A play by Molière, for example, relies onmaintaining the tension of the plot rather than the needs of itsindividuals. Accordingly, we see a seemingly endless parade ofcharacters who are utterly dominated by a single prevalentcharacteristic, providing the premise for many popular ensemblecomedies in which each character reliably acts according to theirqualities, such as The Phil Silvers Show (1955–59), Dad’s Army(1968–77), Are You Being Served? (1972–85), The Simpsons(1989—present), or the Carry On series of films (1958–79). Thecomedian Mike Myers has said that the principle of single-mindednessis essential to successful comedy, suggesting that ‘Comedy characterstend to be a—machine; i.e., Clouseau was a smug machine, Pepe LePew was a love machine, Felix Unger was a clean machine, and AustinPowers is a sex machine’ (quoted in Friend, 2002:82). Consciously orotherwise, Myers is adapting the Bergsonian view that ‘what isessentially laughable is what is done automatically’ (Bergson, 1980:155). Automatism, or the channelling of diverse thoughts and feelingsthrough one overriding principle, has been the impetus behind comiccharacterization since the New Comedy of the third century BC, and
- Page 2 and 3: COMEDYWhat is comedy? Andrew Stott
- Page 4 and 5: iiiIrony by Claire ColebrookLiterat
- Page 6 and 7: First published 2005by Routledge270
- Page 8 and 9: The Grotesque 83Slapstick 87The Fem
- Page 10: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIn keeping with the
- Page 13 and 14: 2 INTRODUCTIONcomic’ is an identi
- Page 15 and 16: 4 INTRODUCTIONassumption being that
- Page 17 and 18: 6 INTRODUCTION‘Whenever they wax
- Page 19 and 20: 8 INTRODUCTIONmeans of opening up t
- Page 21 and 22: 10 INTRODUCTIONJokes therefore emer
- Page 23 and 24: 12 INTRODUCTIONexperience itself as
- Page 25 and 26: 14 INTRODUCTIONrelegation in the hi
- Page 27 and 28: 16 INTRODUCTION
- Page 29 and 30: 18 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWhile there
- Page 31 and 32: 20 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYin the cont
- Page 33 and 34: 22 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWith the ri
- Page 35 and 36: 24 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYother’ (B
- Page 37 and 38: 26 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYvictory pro
- Page 39 and 40: 28 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYSPRINGTIME
- Page 41 and 42: 30 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYreduction t
- Page 43 and 44: 32 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYlocation fo
- Page 45 and 46: 34 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYbut this ap
- Page 47 and 48: 36 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYand also a
- Page 49: 38 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMY
- Page 53 and 54: 42 COMIC IDENTITYwalks of life to a
- Page 55 and 56: 44 COMIC IDENTITYdisease. From this
- Page 57 and 58: 46 COMIC IDENTITYineffable folly of
- Page 59 and 60: 48 COMIC IDENTITYdancing, juggling,
- Page 61 and 62: 50 COMIC IDENTITYThe trickster has
- Page 63 and 64: 52 COMIC IDENTITYShakespeare, fairi
- Page 65 and 66: 54 COMIC IDENTITYCastiglione’s Th
- Page 67 and 68: 56 COMIC IDENTITYway of seeing the
- Page 69 and 70: 58 COMIC IDENTITY1990:248). Not onl
- Page 71 and 72: 60 GENDER AND SEXUALITYignoring tab
- Page 73 and 74: 62 GENDER AND SEXUALITYand alluring
- Page 75 and 76: 64 GENDER AND SEXUALITYunderstand q
- Page 77 and 78: 66 GENDER AND SEXUALITYplaying Rosa
- Page 79 and 80: 68 GENDER AND SEXUALITYfinancial su
- Page 81 and 82: 70 GENDER AND SEXUALITYIf the anato
- Page 83 and 84: 72 GENDER AND SEXUALITYThe represen
- Page 85 and 86: 74 GENDER AND SEXUALITYbeen redefin
- Page 87 and 88: 76 GENDER AND SEXUALITYconverse wit
- Page 89 and 90: 78 GENDER AND SEXUALITYsignificance
- Page 91 and 92: 80 THE BODYBEAUTY AND ABJECTIONIn W
- Page 93 and 94: 82 THE BODYOne idea that may help u
- Page 95 and 96: 84 THE BODYexistence in the face of
- Page 97 and 98: 86 THE BODYThey are healthily scept
- Page 99 and 100: 88 THE BODYFirst, movie performers
- Page 101 and 102:
90 THE BODYyou…at last you’ve c
- Page 103 and 104:
92 THE BODYin a department store, t
- Page 105 and 106:
94 THE BODYWomen have been systemat
- Page 107 and 108:
96 THE BODYand the pair’s drunken
- Page 109 and 110:
98 POLITICSseems to assume—came t
- Page 111 and 112:
100 POLITICScitizens all insulted i
- Page 113 and 114:
102 POLITICSSecretary Tessa Jowell
- Page 115 and 116:
104 POLITICSIt is the stated positi
- Page 117 and 118:
106 POLITICSWhat should I do in Rom
- Page 119 and 120:
108 POLITICSdifficult crowds for wh
- Page 121 and 122:
110 POLITICSalmost laughed, it seem
- Page 123 and 124:
112 POLITICSsatisfied by Price’s
- Page 125 and 126:
114 POLITICSself-centredness of the
- Page 127 and 128:
116 POLITICSwho, in their 1944 essa
- Page 129 and 130:
118 POLITICS(Ezrahi, 2001:307). Rut
- Page 131 and 132:
120 POLITICS
- Page 133 and 134:
122 LAUGHTERevidence for his sense
- Page 135 and 136:
124 LAUGHTERdevils to expel, there
- Page 137 and 138:
126 LAUGHTERand the meane that make
- Page 139 and 140:
128 LAUGHTERHere we find the Christ
- Page 141 and 142:
130 LAUGHTERof mutual relation from
- Page 143 and 144:
132 LAUGHTER‘laughter naturally r
- Page 145 and 146:
134 LAUGHTERceiling, it started lit
- Page 147 and 148:
136 LAUGHTERdeferred. For Nancy, th
- Page 149 and 150:
138 LAUGHTERsatisfy their desires a
- Page 151 and 152:
140 CONCLUSIONhuman imperfection. W
- Page 153 and 154:
142 CONCLUSION
- Page 155 and 156:
144 GLOSSARYcenturies. Commedia del
- Page 157 and 158:
146 GLOSSARYto problematize the ide
- Page 159 and 160:
148 GLOSSARY
- Page 161 and 162:
150 FURTHER READINGAn extremely acc
- Page 163 and 164:
152 BIBLIOGRAPHYErickson and Coppel
- Page 165 and 166:
154 BIBLIOGRAPHYDouglas, Mary (1975
- Page 167 and 168:
156 BIBLIOGRAPHYContexts and Critic
- Page 169 and 170:
158 BIBLIOGRAPHY——(1987), ‘Wi
- Page 171 and 172:
160 BIBLIOGRAPHYSynott, Anthony (19
- Page 173 and 174:
162 INDEXCavell, Stanley 87-3Chapli
- Page 175 and 176:
164 INDEXmarriage 70-77;in British