THE BODY 83THE GROTESQUEThe grotesque could be described as an embodiment of the abject. Aform of humorous monstrosity devised for satiric purposes, thegrotesque marries the repulsive and the comic, as in the paintings ofHieronymus Bosch (c. 1450–1516) or George Grosz (1893–1959), oreven in the spirit of pantomime dames. Retrospectively applied to thedecorative arts of Ancient Rome, the term originally referred to animaginative combination of the real and the fantastic, and especially anunnatural or stylized distortion of organic nature in stark contrast to theregularity of classical order (Vitruvius himself complained about itbitterly). ‘Grotesque’ was a term initially reserved for the visual arts,but later extended to include anything across the arts that containedelements of the ridiculous, the horrifying, and the bizarre. The grotesqueis a form of exaggerated and ambivalent social commentary producedby the violent clash of opposites, especially those that are comic andterrifying, existing in a state of unresolved tension. The site of thegrotesque clash is the human body, resulting in deeply ambiguous anddivided reactions to the horror of corporeality and oneself as anorganism. Mr Creosote, the diner from the 1983 film Monty Python’sThe Meaning of Life, might serve as an example. Here is a man sogluttonous that his eating causes him to vomit torrentially—until heultimately explodes after eating an after-dinner mint. Mr Creosotesurvives but finds himself ripped apart and looking down at his exposedribcage and enlarged heart. As viewers, we are amused by the absurdityof the spectacle, and appreciate its poetic justice. But the image is alsounnerving and disgusting, a visceral rendition of a body destroyed by itsown appetite and made to witness what it has done. It is the unresolvednature of this scenario that gives the grotesque its particular force. Thegrotesque, then, is a humorous mode that aims to produce an ambiguousfeeling pitched somewhere between pleasure and disgust.By far the most notable author of grotesque comic fiction is FrançoisRabelais (c. 1494–1553). Rabelais’s stories of the giants Gargantua andPantagruel follow them through a series of absurd adventures andgrotesque scenarios that celebrate physicality by means of anunremitting obsession with it. Rabelais’s giants and their companionsengage in a continual round of eating, drinking, defecating, urinating,sweating, copulating, and passing wind. They are insatiately anal, oral,and phallic monstrosities whose sexual and scatological openness hopesto release the world from pathological inhibitions and the stress ofmaintaining manners. What they champion is unruly, desiring, animal
84 THE BODYexistence in the face of censorious and ascetic intellectualism. Theproximity of humanity to the body is continually stressed from themoment Gargantua’s mother goes into labour in Book I. His birth isprefaced by a characteristic case of mistaken identity:A while later she began to groan and wail and shout. Then suddenlyswarms of midwives came up from every side, and feeling herunderneath found some rather ill-smelling excrescences, whichthey thought were the child; but it was her fundament slipping out,because of the softening of the right intestine—which you call thebum-gut—owing to her having eaten too much tripe…(Rabelais, 1955:52)The confusion of the baby and bodily waste is symptomatic of the text’ssubstitution of subjectivity with materiality, and its paralleling ofcognitive categories with bodily functions. However, Gargantua andPantagruel are not only representatives of an infantile or hedonistic id,but rather the medium through which Rabelais launches satirical attackson a range of subjects including education, medicine, the ecclesiasticalestablishment, monastic life, and the nature of justice. Rabelaisdeployed his satire in the Erasmian fashion, ridiculing pretension andignorance by saturating it in exaggeration. For Mikhail Bakhtin, ofcourse, Rabelaisian grotesque was the purest possible manifestation ofthe popular-festive folk identity. Arguing that Rabelais’s novels rejectany kind of boundaries between the mannered and disciplined body andthe procreative, alimentary, corpulent, or offensively abject body,Bakhtin claims that Rabelais’s ‘grotesque realism’ demonstrates ‘thebody in the act of becoming’ (Bakhtin, 1984: 317). ‘We find at the basisof grotesque imagery’, he writes, ‘a special concept of the body as awhole and of the limits of the whole. The confines between the bodyand the world and between separate bodies are drawn in the grotesquegenre quite differently than in the classic and naturalistic images’(Bakhtin, 1984:315). The grotesque body is not a closed system definedby clear limits, but a body that reaches out beyond its boundaries andinteracts with the world on a sensual level:The stress is laid on those parts of the body that are open to theoutside world, that is, the parts through which the world enters thebody or emerges from it, or through which the body itself goesout to meet the world. This means that the emphasis is on theapertures or the convexities, or on various ramifications and
- Page 2 and 3:
COMEDYWhat is comedy? Andrew Stott
- Page 4 and 5:
iiiIrony by Claire ColebrookLiterat
- Page 6 and 7:
First published 2005by Routledge270
- Page 8 and 9:
The Grotesque 83Slapstick 87The Fem
- Page 10:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIn keeping with the
- Page 13 and 14:
2 INTRODUCTIONcomic’ is an identi
- Page 15 and 16:
4 INTRODUCTIONassumption being that
- Page 17 and 18:
6 INTRODUCTION‘Whenever they wax
- Page 19 and 20:
8 INTRODUCTIONmeans of opening up t
- Page 21 and 22:
10 INTRODUCTIONJokes therefore emer
- Page 23 and 24:
12 INTRODUCTIONexperience itself as
- Page 25 and 26:
14 INTRODUCTIONrelegation in the hi
- Page 27 and 28:
16 INTRODUCTION
- Page 29 and 30:
18 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWhile there
- Page 31 and 32:
20 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYin the cont
- Page 33 and 34:
22 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYWith the ri
- Page 35 and 36:
24 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYother’ (B
- Page 37 and 38:
26 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYvictory pro
- Page 39 and 40:
28 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYSPRINGTIME
- Page 41 and 42:
30 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYreduction t
- Page 43 and 44: 32 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYlocation fo
- Page 45 and 46: 34 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYbut this ap
- Page 47 and 48: 36 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMYand also a
- Page 49 and 50: 38 COMEDY IN THE ACADEMY
- Page 51 and 52: 40 COMIC IDENTITYnows, changing voi
- Page 53 and 54: 42 COMIC IDENTITYwalks of life to a
- Page 55 and 56: 44 COMIC IDENTITYdisease. From this
- Page 57 and 58: 46 COMIC IDENTITYineffable folly of
- Page 59 and 60: 48 COMIC IDENTITYdancing, juggling,
- Page 61 and 62: 50 COMIC IDENTITYThe trickster has
- Page 63 and 64: 52 COMIC IDENTITYShakespeare, fairi
- Page 65 and 66: 54 COMIC IDENTITYCastiglione’s Th
- Page 67 and 68: 56 COMIC IDENTITYway of seeing the
- Page 69 and 70: 58 COMIC IDENTITY1990:248). Not onl
- Page 71 and 72: 60 GENDER AND SEXUALITYignoring tab
- Page 73 and 74: 62 GENDER AND SEXUALITYand alluring
- Page 75 and 76: 64 GENDER AND SEXUALITYunderstand q
- Page 77 and 78: 66 GENDER AND SEXUALITYplaying Rosa
- Page 79 and 80: 68 GENDER AND SEXUALITYfinancial su
- Page 81 and 82: 70 GENDER AND SEXUALITYIf the anato
- Page 83 and 84: 72 GENDER AND SEXUALITYThe represen
- Page 85 and 86: 74 GENDER AND SEXUALITYbeen redefin
- Page 87 and 88: 76 GENDER AND SEXUALITYconverse wit
- Page 89 and 90: 78 GENDER AND SEXUALITYsignificance
- Page 91 and 92: 80 THE BODYBEAUTY AND ABJECTIONIn W
- Page 93: 82 THE BODYOne idea that may help u
- Page 97 and 98: 86 THE BODYThey are healthily scept
- Page 99 and 100: 88 THE BODYFirst, movie performers
- Page 101 and 102: 90 THE BODYyou…at last you’ve c
- Page 103 and 104: 92 THE BODYin a department store, t
- Page 105 and 106: 94 THE BODYWomen have been systemat
- Page 107 and 108: 96 THE BODYand the pair’s drunken
- Page 109 and 110: 98 POLITICSseems to assume—came t
- Page 111 and 112: 100 POLITICScitizens all insulted i
- Page 113 and 114: 102 POLITICSSecretary Tessa Jowell
- Page 115 and 116: 104 POLITICSIt is the stated positi
- Page 117 and 118: 106 POLITICSWhat should I do in Rom
- Page 119 and 120: 108 POLITICSdifficult crowds for wh
- Page 121 and 122: 110 POLITICSalmost laughed, it seem
- Page 123 and 124: 112 POLITICSsatisfied by Price’s
- Page 125 and 126: 114 POLITICSself-centredness of the
- Page 127 and 128: 116 POLITICSwho, in their 1944 essa
- Page 129 and 130: 118 POLITICS(Ezrahi, 2001:307). Rut
- Page 131 and 132: 120 POLITICS
- Page 133 and 134: 122 LAUGHTERevidence for his sense
- Page 135 and 136: 124 LAUGHTERdevils to expel, there
- Page 137 and 138: 126 LAUGHTERand the meane that make
- Page 139 and 140: 128 LAUGHTERHere we find the Christ
- Page 141 and 142: 130 LAUGHTERof mutual relation from
- Page 143 and 144: 132 LAUGHTER‘laughter naturally r
- Page 145 and 146:
134 LAUGHTERceiling, it started lit
- Page 147 and 148:
136 LAUGHTERdeferred. For Nancy, th
- Page 149 and 150:
138 LAUGHTERsatisfy their desires a
- Page 151 and 152:
140 CONCLUSIONhuman imperfection. W
- Page 153 and 154:
142 CONCLUSION
- Page 155 and 156:
144 GLOSSARYcenturies. Commedia del
- Page 157 and 158:
146 GLOSSARYto problematize the ide
- Page 159 and 160:
148 GLOSSARY
- Page 161 and 162:
150 FURTHER READINGAn extremely acc
- Page 163 and 164:
152 BIBLIOGRAPHYErickson and Coppel
- Page 165 and 166:
154 BIBLIOGRAPHYDouglas, Mary (1975
- Page 167 and 168:
156 BIBLIOGRAPHYContexts and Critic
- Page 169 and 170:
158 BIBLIOGRAPHY——(1987), ‘Wi
- Page 171 and 172:
160 BIBLIOGRAPHYSynott, Anthony (19
- Page 173 and 174:
162 INDEXCavell, Stanley 87-3Chapli
- Page 175 and 176:
164 INDEXmarriage 70-77;in British