12.07.2015 Views

S - Kam Ng PhD Dissertation Final.pdf - Digital Repository of CCEE ...

S - Kam Ng PhD Dissertation Final.pdf - Digital Repository of CCEE ...

S - Kam Ng PhD Dissertation Final.pdf - Digital Repository of CCEE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1303.4.7. Static load testsFollowing completion <strong>of</strong> all restrikes, vertical SLTs were performed on test pilesfollowing the ―Quick Test‖ procedure <strong>of</strong> ASTM D 1143 according to the schedule indicatedin Table 3.3. In addition to recording the strain data along the pile shaft, four 250 mm (0.8ft)-stroke displacement transducers installed at the four extreme edges <strong>of</strong> the test pile flangesrecorded the pile vertical movement during each loading and unloading step. For each pile,the pile resistance (or the total nominal resistance) was calculated using the measured loaddisplacementcurve and the Davisson’s criterion (Davisson, 1972), whereas the variation inpile force along the depth was estimated using the measured strain data at every load step asshown in Figure 3.9. By extending the slope <strong>of</strong> the pile force resistance along the pile lengthover the bottom two pairs <strong>of</strong> strain data, the end bearing contribution was also estimated atthe toe <strong>of</strong> each pile. The nominal pile resistance <strong>of</strong> ISU 5 was found to be 1081 kN (243kip), and its distribution along the pile length is shown in Figure 3.9 (by the solid linewithout markers) as established from interpolation <strong>of</strong> the force distribution curvescorresponding to 1051 kN (236 kip) and 1114 kN (250 kip). In this case, the end bearingcomponent was 247 kN (56 kip) or 23% <strong>of</strong> the total pile resistance <strong>of</strong> 1081 kN.Subtracting the end bearing resistance from the total nominal pile resistance, the shaftresistance for ISU5 was determined to be 834 kN (188 kip). Table 3.3 lists the shaftresistance and end bearing for all test piles except ISU4 and ISU6, for which large number <strong>of</strong>strain gauges failed during the test and thus this information could not be extracted withsufficient accuracy.3.5. Results3.5.1. Observed pile setupIn addition to the increase in hammer blow counts observed Figure 3.7 between theEOD condition and BOR6 for ISU5, Table 3.4 summarizes the percent <strong>of</strong> pile resistanceincrease at different times (∆R t ) with reference to the calculated pile resistance at EOD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!