- Page 1: Pile Setup, Dynamic Construction Co
- Page 5: v2.5.8. Soil profile input procedur
- Page 8 and 9: viii6.2. Introduction .............
- Page 10 and 11: xLIST OF FIGURESFigure 2.1: Typical
- Page 12 and 13: xiiresistances using the proposed p
- Page 14 and 15: xivLIST OF TABLESTable 2.1: Summary
- Page 16 and 17: xviABSTRACTBecause of the mandate i
- Page 18 and 19: xviiiFurthermore, using these calib
- Page 20 and 21: 2soil strength. The gain in effecti
- Page 22 and 23: 4check pile integrity; (5) evaluate
- Page 24 and 25: 6confidently accounted for in curre
- Page 26 and 27: 8Board (IHRB) sponsored research pr
- Page 28 and 29: 10collected undisturbed soil sample
- Page 32 and 33: 14Chapter 1 - Introduction: An over
- Page 34 and 35: 16Dirks, Kermit L., and Patrick Kam
- Page 36 and 37: 18CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEWThis
- Page 38 and 39: 20Today, the dynamic analysis metho
- Page 40 and 41: 22over the conventional static load
- Page 42 and 43: 242.3.3. Wave mechanicsThe principl
- Page 44 and 45: 26The Case method assumes a uniform
- Page 46 and 47: 28t m = time when maximum total res
- Page 48 and 49: 30FT2FT3ZLECstress occurs measured
- Page 50 and 51: 32Rausche and Goble (1979) classifi
- Page 52 and 53: 342.3.8. Interpretation and calcula
- Page 54 and 55: 362.3.9. Example calculationReferre
- Page 56 and 57: 38StrokeRamW1CapblockPileCap Pileca
- Page 58 and 59: Soil Resistance (R)40A’x’q Q=Qu
- Page 60 and 61: 42Smith established four routines t
- Page 62 and 63: where,Table 2.4: Summary 1 of dynam
- Page 64 and 65: 46Measured ForceComputed ForceMeasu
- Page 66 and 67: ̇48R skR dkk sku i= static soil re
- Page 68 and 69: ̇50k sku ig i= soil stiffness of t
- Page 70 and 71: 52of a match quality (MQ). The matc
- Page 72 and 73: 542.5. Wave Equation Analysis Progr
- Page 74 and 75: 562.5.2. Hammer modelHammers can be
- Page 76 and 77: 58the spring stiffness develops onl
- Page 78 and 79: 60v xiusing Figure 5 in Rausche (19
- Page 80 and 81:
62for monotube piles. Furthermore,
- Page 82 and 83:
64shaft unit resistances, and Felle
- Page 84 and 85:
66WEAP analysis based on the Iowa B
- Page 86 and 87:
68The second output option is the d
- Page 88 and 89:
70summarized in Table 2.11, Table 2
- Page 90 and 91:
72Table 2.11: Correlation studies b
- Page 92 and 93:
74Table 2.12: Correlation studies b
- Page 94 and 95:
76Case Reference Pile type15161718P
- Page 96 and 97:
78Case Reference Pile type262728293
- Page 98 and 99:
80Table 2.13: Correlation studies b
- Page 100 and 101:
822.7. LRFD Resistance Factors for
- Page 102 and 103:
F (R), f (Q)84Figure 2.16 shows pro
- Page 104 and 105:
86̅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ( ) ̅̅̅̅̅
- Page 106 and 107:
88between the economy of the design
- Page 108 and 109:
90design coordinates,( ) = cumulati
- Page 110 and 111:
92resistance factors (0.65 and 0.75
- Page 112 and 113:
942.8.2 Effect of pileIt was report
- Page 114 and 115:
96leading to the breakdown of archi
- Page 116 and 117:
98Table 2.18: Summary of available
- Page 118 and 119:
100Table 2.19: Summary of piling pr
- Page 120 and 121:
102where,∆R= increase in pile res
- Page 122 and 123:
104and Sutabutr (1999) proposed a n
- Page 124 and 125:
106studies available in literature.
- Page 126 and 127:
108Bowles, J. E. (1996). Foundation
- Page 128 and 129:
110Fellenius, B. H., Riker, R. E.,
- Page 130 and 131:
112Setup.‖ Journal of the Transpo
- Page 132 and 133:
114Testing.‖ Proceeding of the 7
- Page 134 and 135:
116Hussein, M.H., Eds, ASCE, Reston
- Page 136 and 137:
118Bearing Piles Embedded in Unifor
- Page 138 and 139:
120CHAPTER 3: PILE SETUP IN COHESIV
- Page 140 and 141:
122A literature review by the write
- Page 142 and 143:
1243.4. Field Investigation3.4.1. T
- Page 144 and 145:
126to 201 kPa (29 psi), respectivel
- Page 146 and 147:
128borehole such that the piezomete
- Page 148 and 149:
1303.4.7. Static load testsFollowin
- Page 150 and 151:
1323.5.3. Logarithmic trendWhen plo
- Page 152 and 153:
134SLT have a similar trend. The ma
- Page 154 and 155:
136situ (i.e., SPTs, and/or CPTs wi
- Page 156 and 157:
1383.8. NotationThe following symbo
- Page 158 and 159:
140Ng, K.W., Suleiman, M.T., and Sr
- Page 160 and 161:
142Table 3.2: Weighted average soil
- Page 162 and 163:
144TestpileISU2ISU3ISU4ISU5ISU6Tabl
- Page 164 and 165:
Depth below ground (m)Depth below g
- Page 166 and 167:
Pile Penetration Below Ground (m)Pi
- Page 168 and 169:
Percent Increase In Resistance, ∆
- Page 170 and 171:
Installation of PCsBOR4BOR5BOR6BOR7
- Page 172 and 173:
Percent Gain In Pile Resistance at
- Page 174 and 175:
1564.2. IntroductionDynamic and sta
- Page 176 and 177:
158Karlsrud et al. (2005) has incor
- Page 178 and 179:
160In order to characterize the pil
- Page 180 and 181:
162( ) (4.8)where f c = consolidati
- Page 182 and 183:
164condition (R EOD ) were estimate
- Page 184 and 185:
166average SPT N-value (N a ) calcu
- Page 186 and 187:
168in Figure 4.13. It was expected
- Page 188 and 189:
170diameter piles (i.e., diameter >
- Page 190 and 191:
172welcoming, and closed-form metho
- Page 192 and 193:
17435 at Clarke County, Iowa. The d
- Page 194 and 195:
176( ) 0. / . / 1 . / = 1005 kNR se
- Page 196 and 197:
178619-631.Fellenius, B. H. (2008).
- Page 198 and 199:
180Load Testing Program in Light of
- Page 200 and 201:
Table 4.2: Summary of the twelve da
- Page 202 and 203:
Table 4.4: Summary of six external
- Page 204 and 205:
1841.21.00.8R t /R o0.6ISU2 (restri
- Page 206 and 207:
Pile Setup Rate (C)Pile Setup Rate
- Page 208 and 209:
PercentPercentPercentPercent1886050
- Page 210 and 211:
Ratio of Measured and Predicted Pil
- Page 212 and 213:
192CHAPTER 5: A PROCEDURE FOR INCOR
- Page 214 and 215:
194C h = horizontal coefficient of
- Page 216 and 217:
196records measured using Pile Driv
- Page 218 and 219:
1985.3.2. Results of Conventional F
- Page 220 and 221:
2002.33 or 0.57 when β T of 3.00 t
- Page 222 and 223:
202A total of 17 points given in Ta
- Page 224 and 225:
204, -( )√ [( ). /]. /√( )(5.12
- Page 226 and 227:
Efficiency Factor, φ/λ206respecti
- Page 228 and 229:
208respectively. Figure 5.5 illustr
- Page 230 and 231:
φ(R EOD +R setup )φ(R EOD +R setu
- Page 232 and 233:
212Steve Megivern of this research
- Page 234 and 235:
214Rome, NY, (http:www.theriac.org/
- Page 236 and 237:
2166.2. IntroductionAllowable Stres
- Page 238 and 239:
218and the calibration procedure pr
- Page 240 and 241:
220Table 6.1, 11 in sand, 12 in cla
- Page 242 and 243:
222(6.3)where,F o [Z i ] = the cumu
- Page 244 and 245:
224procedure has been described in
- Page 246 and 247:
2263. RR for setup is a ratio of me
- Page 248 and 249:
2286.5. Construction Control Consid
- Page 250 and 251:
230two blue curved lines represent
- Page 252 and 253:
232with WEAP’s. However, consider
- Page 254 and 255:
234Furthermore, the procedure of in
- Page 256 and 257:
236of Transportation, Iowa State Un
- Page 258 and 259:
SoilprofileMixedID78254346667390106
- Page 260 and 261:
TestpileIDISU1ISU2ISU3ISU4ISU5ISU6I
- Page 262 and 263:
242Table 6.5: Summary of the empiri
- Page 264 and 265:
244Table 6.9: Recommended resistanc
- Page 266 and 267:
PercentPercent246ST-BOR0.5WEAP-Clay
- Page 268 and 269:
1.1791.060Percent0.8681.3821.2491.0
- Page 270 and 271:
250CHAPTER 7: AN IMPROVED CAPWAP MA
- Page 272 and 273:
252establish relationships between
- Page 274 and 275:
254Although these recommendations h
- Page 276 and 277:
256pile embedment (i.e., the same s
- Page 278 and 279:
258where,( ) = measured or estimate
- Page 280 and 281:
2607.5.1. EOD condition for cohesiv
- Page 282 and 283:
262better confidence in quantifying
- Page 284 and 285:
2647.5.3. Post EOD condition for co
- Page 286 and 287:
266(a) and (b) for J s and q s , re
- Page 288 and 289:
268comparison was assessed in terms
- Page 290 and 291:
2707.10. ReferencesComputers and St
- Page 292 and 293:
272Table 7.1: Summary of suggested
- Page 294 and 295:
274TestPileISU5ISU6ISU9DepthBelowGr
- Page 296 and 297:
276Table 7.7: Comparison between th
- Page 298 and 299:
Toe Damping Factor at EOD, J T (s/m
- Page 300 and 301:
Depth below ground (m)Depth below g
- Page 302 and 303:
Depth Below Ground (m)Depth Below G
- Page 304 and 305:
Smith's Damping Factor, J s (s/m)De
- Page 306 and 307:
Damping Factor, J S (s/m)Shaft Quak
- Page 308 and 309:
Toe Damping Factor, J T (s/m)Toe, Q
- Page 310 and 311:
290Through execution of the above l
- Page 312 and 313:
292logarithmic trend. The amount of
- Page 314 and 315:
294to 0.80, the maximum value recom
- Page 316 and 317:
296signal matching procedure in fut