12.07.2015 Views

S - Kam Ng PhD Dissertation Final.pdf - Digital Repository of CCEE ...

S - Kam Ng PhD Dissertation Final.pdf - Digital Repository of CCEE ...

S - Kam Ng PhD Dissertation Final.pdf - Digital Repository of CCEE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

294to 0.80, the maximum value recommended by AASHTO (2010). Overall, the constructioncontrol consideration has increased the originally-calibrated resistance factors <strong>of</strong> the IowaBlue Book method as follow:1. Construction control using WEAP has increased the original φ value <strong>of</strong> theIowa Blue Book from 0.60 to 0.64 or improved the φ value by 7%.2. Construction control using CAPWAP increases the original φ value <strong>of</strong> theIowa Blue Book for the clay pr<strong>of</strong>ile from 0.60 to 0.68 (or improved by 8%),considering both the EOD and setup resistance conditions.3. The construction control method using CAPWAP, based on the restrikecondition, improves the φ values for clay, mixed soil, and sand pr<strong>of</strong>iles by27%, 18%, and 6%, respectively.8.2.5. Dynamic soil parameters quantificationDue to the limitation with current default CAPWAP matching procedure, in whichconstant damping factor and quake value are assumed over an entire soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile and theindeterminate nature <strong>of</strong> the CAPWAP analysis, Chapter 7 shows the high degree <strong>of</strong> scatter inthe correlation studies between the dynamic soil parameters and the SPT N-value. Althoughthe accuracy <strong>of</strong> pile resistance estimation using dynamic analysis methods is highlydependent upon the appropriate input <strong>of</strong> these dynamic soil parameters, these parametershave not been successfully quantified from any standard geotechnical in-situ or laboratorysoil test results. Thus, an improved CAPWAP signal matching procedure with variation inshaft dynamic soil parameters was proposed. Its implementation led to the followingconclusions:1. The analytical results show the dynamic soil parameters are not constant over anentire soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile, but they vary with different soil types and soil properties.2. For cohesive soils at the EOD condition, the correlation studies revealed a directrelationship between the shaft damping factor and the SPT N-value, and aninverse relationship between the shaft quake value and the SPT N-value.Furthermore, correlation studies using CPT-measured soil properties concludedthat the shaft damping factor was influenced by different soil types, while no

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!