12.07.2015 Views

S - Kam Ng PhD Dissertation Final.pdf - Digital Repository of CCEE ...

S - Kam Ng PhD Dissertation Final.pdf - Digital Repository of CCEE ...

S - Kam Ng PhD Dissertation Final.pdf - Digital Repository of CCEE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

166average SPT N-value (N a ) calculated using Eq. (4.5), horizontal coefficient <strong>of</strong> consolidation(C h ) estimated using Eq. (4.7), and pile radius (r p ), a pile resistance was estimated using theproposed pile setup method presented in Eq. (4.9) at the time <strong>of</strong> restrike or SLT. With theconsideration <strong>of</strong> pile setup using the proposed method, Figure 4.12 shows that the data pointsrepresented with a linear best fit dashed line shifts towards the solid equal line <strong>of</strong> measuredand estimated resistances.For comparative purposes, means (μ) and standard deviations (σ) <strong>of</strong> pile resistanceratios for both EOD condition (R m /R EOD ) and the proposed setup method (R m /R t ) werecalculated based on two pile categories: (1) pile sizes equal to and greater than 600 mm(referred to as large diameter piles); and (2) pile sizes smaller than 600 mm (referred to smalldiameter piles). Based on the μ and σ values summarized in Figure 4.11, large diameter pilesexhibited a greater pile setup than smaller piles, supported by larger μ and σ values <strong>of</strong> 1.663and 0.591, respectively. The consideration <strong>of</strong> pile setup using the proposed method not onlyreduces the μ values from 1.663 to 1.184 and from 1.454 to 1.063 for large and smalldiameter piles, respectively, but it also reduces the σ values. When comparing the μ and σvalues given in Figure 4.12, the smaller μ and σ values <strong>of</strong> 1.063 and 0.274, respectively,reveal that the proposed setup method provides a better pile setup prediction for smallerdiameter piles. When compared with the values computed based on steel H-piles given inFigure 4.10 (μ = 1.024 and σ = 0.153), the results confirm that the proposed setup methodprovides a better setup prediction for low displacement piles (steel H-piles) than largedisplacement piles. This assessment provides a potential for future refinement <strong>of</strong> the pilesetup method for large displacement piles, providing that detailed soil information and pileresponse measurements as similarly performed on steel H-piles.4.5.3. Mixed soil pr<strong>of</strong>ileThe application <strong>of</strong> the proposed Eq. (4.9) to quantifying the increase in pile resistance<strong>of</strong> a steel H-pile embedded in a mixed soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile was evaluated using the field test results <strong>of</strong>a recently completed test pile ISU8. It is a HP 250 × 63 steel pile embedded in a layer <strong>of</strong>approximately 6.4 m (21 ft) low plasticity clay (CL) underlying with approximately 5.18 m

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!