Examiner's Manual & Technical Report - Kaplanco.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Determining Starting PointsOnce the chronological age for a child has been converted into months, the starting point foreach subscale should be determined. The starting point is the first item in the samedevelopmental age range as the child's chronological age.1. Begin the assessment at the first item in the same developmental age range as the child'schronological age. In Figure 3, Example A, Jorge’s chronological age is 54 months. Sincethere is a 54-month developmental range, assessment would begin at the first item in thatrange (e.g., CM14).2. If the child’s chronological age does not match one of the developmental age rangesfor a subscale, begin at the first item in the developmental age range prior to thechild’s chronological age. In Figure 3, Example B, Alan’s chronological age is 70months. There is no developmental range for 70 months; therefore, assessment wouldbegin with the first item in the 60 month developmental range, which is thedevelopmental age range, prior to Alan’s chronological age (e.g., CM19).3. Mark the starting point by circling the item number where the assessment shouldbegin on each subscale. See Figure 3 for illustrations.Determining Starting Points for Children with DisabilitiesIn the case of children with disabilities, the reports of screening tests and/or other professionaldiagnostic results may be used to provide information about the child's expected developmentallevel of functioning. This information should form the basis for determining the appropriatepoint for beginning the assessment process. If this information is not available, beginadministering the assessment at half of the child's chronological age, which should allow for theestablishment of a basal. However, depending on the nature of a child’s disabilities, he or shemay be able to start at the chronological age level for some subscales that are not affected by thespecific disabilities.20
Figure 3. Determining Starting PointsJORGEALANCA= 54 MONTHS CA=70 MONTHSDEV AGE ITEM# DEV AGE ITEM#18 CM1 18 CM124 CM2 24 CM224 CM3 24 CM324 CM4 24 CM424 CM5 24 CM536 CM6 36 CM636 CM7 36 CM742 CM8 42 CM842 CM9 42 CM948 CM10 48 CM1048 CM11 48 CM1148 CM12 48 CM1248CM1348 CM1354 CM14 54 CM1454 CM15 54 CM1554 CM16 54 CM1654 CM17 54 CM1754 CM18 54CM1860 CM19 60 CM1960 CM20 60 CM2072 CM21 72 CM2172 CM22 72 CM2272 CM23 72 CM2372 CM24 72 CM2421
Page 3 and 4: Initial DevelopmentDavid Wilson LeM
Page 6 and 7: About the AuthorsBelinda J. Hardin
Page 8 and 9: Interpreting LAP-D Profiles........
Page 10 and 11: validity, in English and Spanish?
Page 12 and 13: the LAP-D Third Edition is comprise
Page 15 and 16: Chapter 2Overview of the LAP-DThis
Page 17 and 18: egression procedures. This study ex
Page 19 and 20: Table 1. Subscales of the LAP-DDoma
Page 21: LAP-D Scoring Booklet. The Scoring
Page 24 and 25: ecomes inattentive or severely dist
Page 26 and 27: --When borrowing a month, borrow 30
Page 30 and 31: Scoring Procedures RulesOnce the st
Page 32 and 33: Figure 3a. Determining the BasalJOR
Page 34 and 35: Ceiling RulesThe child’s ceiling
Page 36 and 37: Additional Scoring Rules1. Administ
Page 38 and 39: Figure 5. Computing Raw ScoresDEVAG
Page 40 and 41: complete the Scoring Summary & Prof
Page 42 and 43: Figure 7: Shanika’s Scoring Summa
Page 44 and 45: Figure 9: Alan’s Scoring Summary
Page 46 and 47: Communicating Assessment Results to
Page 48 and 49: of training and experience required
Page 50 and 51: sessions, one to three weeks apart,
Page 52 and 53: Changes were made to the translatio
Page 54 and 55: 60-65 months 183 62.4 001.8 194 62.
Page 56 and 57: Table 6. Adults and Number of Child
Page 58 and 59: Prior to selection of the criterion
Page 60 and 61: additional 409 children (19.5%; n=2
Page 62 and 63: means, standard deviations, and cor
Page 64 and 65: • Comprehension30-35 months 99 08
Page 66 and 67: Table 12b. Internal Consistency of
Page 68 and 69: Table 13b. Standard Errors of Measu
Page 70 and 71: Test-retest reliability was determi
Page 72 and 73: speaking children, 8.62% were Black
Page 74 and 75: Table 17b. Means, Standard Deviatio
Page 76 and 77: Table 18b. Zero-order Correlations
Page 78 and 79:
Table 20. Correlations Between LAP-
Page 80 and 81:
Table 23 depicts the means, standar
Page 82 and 83:
Age Equivalent ScoresAn age equival
Page 85 and 86:
ReferencesAmerican Educational Rese
Page 87 and 88:
Errata for theExaminer’s Manual &
Page 89 and 90:
Table A-1. Percentile Rank, NCE, t-
Page 91 and 92:
Table B-2. Percentile Ranks for LAP
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Table B-10. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
30-35 MONTHS 36-41 MONTHS 42-47 MON
Page 107 and 108:
30-35 MONTHS 36-41 MONTHS 42-47 MON
Page 109 and 110:
Table C-1. Percentile Ranks for LAP
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Table C-11. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 121 and 122:
Table C-13. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 123 and 124:
Table C-15. Percentile Ranks for To
Page 125:
Table C-16. Spanish Age Equivalents
show all

Examiner's Manual & Technical Report - Kaplanco.com

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?