Examiner's Manual & Technical Report - Kaplanco.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AcknowledgmentsInitial Development of the LAP-DSpecial commendation goes to Anne R. Sanford, retired Director of the Chapel Hill Training-Outreach Project for the initial concept and design of the Learning Accomplishment Profile-Diagnostic (LAP-D). Research and development funding was provided by the Office of ChildDevelopment and the Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, Department of Health,Education and Welfare, 1975-1977. David Wilson LeMay, Patricia M. Griffin, and Anne R.Sanford, with the statistical advice of Sergio Maltes, were primarily responsible for the initialdevelopment, pilot studies, and revision process resulting in the final form published byKaplan Press in 1977. The Learning Accomplishment Profile-Diagnostic Edition Examiner’sManual (1977) provides the technical data related to the assessment’s initial developmentand pilot studies.LAP-D Second EditionKaplan Press in collaboration with Chapel Hill Training-Outreach Project initiated therevision and standardization of the LAP-D, in consultation with Aubrey Nehring and EmmaNehring who completed the final revisions and national standardization. John R. Bruni Jr.and Patricia L. Randolph of Western Kentucky University provided statistical consultationand guidance during the preparation of the Technical Report for the completedstandardization and norming study.LAP-D Third EditionThis report presents the guidelines and research results for the third edition of the LAP-D,both the English and Spanish versions. The report represents the culmination of efforts bymany people across the country. We especially want to thank the families and earlychildhood programs for their willingness to participate in the project. A list of theparticipating programs is located in the Appendix. Additionally, we want to extend ourappreciation to the data collection team for their hard work and dedication, including:Florida Massachusetts Minnesota North Carolina TexasAna Pazos-RegoAlexis PiñaBrenda JohnsonChristina AlzolaElizabeth SocarrasLuzmary AmestyYania GomezGaery CostaAdolfo SegarraCindy LutzMichele UrbinatiPolly SouthworthTeresa UrbinatiWendy SusenAmy AckmanLaurie HagenLeticia NievesNancy JimenezSandra SuarezTracy MartinezStephanie WeeksTricia BusickJessica FlaglerClaudette WestMary M. ContieAnne WagnerDebra CarsonGabriela IbarraLeigh WilsonLinda RonconiMaria FloresSabrina MarshallIII
Page 3: Initial DevelopmentDavid Wilson LeM
Page 7 and 8: Table of ContentsChapter 1: Introdu
Page 9 and 10: OverviewChapter 1Introduction:The L
Page 11 and 12: of-year). For example, at the begin
Page 13: • To assist in the identification
Page 16 and 17: In 1974, the First Form of the LAP-
Page 18 and 19: indicate strong correlations (.74 t
Page 20 and 21: Gross Motor: Body MovementGross Mot
Page 23 and 24: Chapter 3Test Administration Guidel
Page 25 and 26: the assessment at a later time. Tak
Page 27 and 28: Figure 2a Calculating Chronological
Page 29 and 30: Figure 3. Determining Starting Poin
Page 31 and 32: Establishing Basals and CeilingsBec
Page 33 and 34: Figure 3b. Backing Up In Increments
Page 35 and 36: Figure 4. Determining the CeilingJO
Page 37 and 38: Chapter 4Scoring and Interpreting L
Page 39 and 40: Types of Assessment ResultsStandard
Page 41 and 42: Figure 6. Scoring Summary & Profile
Page 43 and 44: Figure 8: Jorge’s Scoring Summary
Page 45 and 46: Recording Observations and Recommen
Page 47 and 48: Interpret normative data appropriat
Page 49 and 50: Overview of StudyChapter 5Methodolo
Page 51 and 52: language and the Peabody Picture Vo
Page 53 and 54: sampling procedure was used based o
Page 55 and 56:
White 281 48 141 069 0539 047.9Othe
Page 57 and 58:
Parents were asked to indicate the
Page 59 and 60:
Letter-Word Identification, Applied
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 6Statistical Properties of
Page 63 and 64:
60-65 months 167 24.93 2.25 190 25.
Page 65 and 66:
age groups are also quite high (.69
Page 67 and 68:
Table 13a. Standard Errors of Measu
Page 69 and 70:
Table 14. Demographics of Test-Rete
Page 71 and 72:
Table 15b presents the means and st
Page 73 and 74:
Interrater reliability was determin
Page 75 and 76:
correlations would suggest that the
Page 77 and 78:
Table 19b. Zero-order Correlations
Page 79 and 80:
LAP-D domain and subscale raw score
Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 7Process for Developing Nor
Page 83:
t-scores have a mean of 50 points a
Page 86 and 87:
LeMay, A. R. (1977). The Learning A
Page 88 and 89:
Dear LAP-D User:Thank you for using
Page 90 and 91:
Table B-1. Percentile Ranks for LAP
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Table B-11. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
30-35 MONTHS 36-41 MONTHS 42-47 MON
Page 108 and 109:
Table B-16. English Age Equivalents
Page 110 and 111:
Table C-2. Percentile Ranks for LAP
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Table C-10. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
30-35 MONTHS 36-41 MONTHS 42-47 MON
show all

Examiner's Manual & Technical Report - Kaplanco.com

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?