Examiner's Manual & Technical Report - Kaplanco.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Test-retest reliability was determined by calculating the correlations between subscales and thedomain scores from the first and the second test administrations using Pearson's r. Table 15apresents the means and standard deviations for the first and second test scores and the test-retestcorrelation coefficients for each domain and subscale for the English-speaking sample. Theresulting correlations at both the domain (.95 to .97) and subscale (.88 to .96) levels demonstratevery good test-retest reliability, indicating a high degree of stability in individual test scores overshort intervals of time.Table 15a. Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations of LAP-D Raw Scores for Test-Retest ReliabilityEnglish-Speaking Sample (n=163)DOMAIN/SubscaleFirst TestingSecond TestingMean SD Mean SD rFINE MOTOR 38.22 12.35 40.47 11.91 .97• Manipulation 21.42 4.85 22.56 4.29 .91• Writing 16.82 8.18 17.92 8.31 .96COGNITIVE 33.23 12.25 35.51 12.52 .96• Matching 16.00 5.46 17.46 5.43 .92• Counting 17.19 7.49 18.05 7.72 .95LANGUAGE 32.19 11.00 34.71 11.89 .96• Naming 15.65 6.63 17.35 7.49 .93• Comprehension 16.52 5.01 17.39 4.96 .94GROSS MOTOR 40.13 10.84 41.45 10.13 .95• Body Movement 22.91 7.45 23.58 7.12 .94• Object Movement 17.20 4.07 17.90 3.69 .88Note: For all correlations, p
Table 15b presents the means and standard deviations for the first and second test scores and thetest-retest correlation coefficients for each domain and subscale for the Spanish-speaking sample.The resulting correlations at both the domain (.93 to .95) and subscale (.86 to .94) levelsdemonstrate very good test-retest reliability, indicating a high degree of stability in individualtest scores over short intervals of time.Table 15b. Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations of LAP-D Raw Scores for Test-Retest ReliabilitySpanish-Speaking Sample (n=155)DOMAIN/SubscaleFirst TestingSecond TestingMean SD Mean SD RFINE MOTOR 38.10 12.33 41.27 12.21 .95• Manipulation 21.29 5.27 22.78 4.69 .93• Writing 16.90 7.07 18.53 8.07 .93COGNITIVE 29.36 10.34 31.96 10.01 .94• Matching 15.30 5.57 16.87 5.62 .93• Counting 14.06 5.57 15.08 5.19 .90LANGUAGE 37.57 10.36 30.39 10.26 .93• Naming 13.01 6.05 14.69 6.25 .89• Comprehension 14.51 4.85 15.69 4.51 .91GROSS MOTOR 40.30 11.11 43.25 10.36 .95• Body Movement 23.01 7.47 24.89 6.87 .94• Object Movement 17.29 4.32 18.36 4.18 .86Note: For all correlations, p
Page 3 and 4:
Initial DevelopmentDavid Wilson LeM
Page 6 and 7:
About the AuthorsBelinda J. Hardin
Page 8 and 9:
Interpreting LAP-D Profiles........
Page 10 and 11:
validity, in English and Spanish?
Page 12 and 13:
the LAP-D Third Edition is comprise
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 2Overview of the LAP-DThis
Page 17 and 18:
egression procedures. This study ex
Page 19 and 20: Table 1. Subscales of the LAP-DDoma
Page 21: LAP-D Scoring Booklet. The Scoring
Page 24 and 25: ecomes inattentive or severely dist
Page 26 and 27: --When borrowing a month, borrow 30
Page 28 and 29: Determining Starting PointsOnce the
Page 30 and 31: Scoring Procedures RulesOnce the st
Page 32 and 33: Figure 3a. Determining the BasalJOR
Page 34 and 35: Ceiling RulesThe child’s ceiling
Page 36 and 37: Additional Scoring Rules1. Administ
Page 38 and 39: Figure 5. Computing Raw ScoresDEVAG
Page 40 and 41: complete the Scoring Summary & Prof
Page 42 and 43: Figure 7: Shanika’s Scoring Summa
Page 44 and 45: Figure 9: Alan’s Scoring Summary
Page 46 and 47: Communicating Assessment Results to
Page 48 and 49: of training and experience required
Page 50 and 51: sessions, one to three weeks apart,
Page 52 and 53: Changes were made to the translatio
Page 54 and 55: 60-65 months 183 62.4 001.8 194 62.
Page 56 and 57: Table 6. Adults and Number of Child
Page 58 and 59: Prior to selection of the criterion
Page 60 and 61: additional 409 children (19.5%; n=2
Page 62 and 63: means, standard deviations, and cor
Page 64 and 65: • Comprehension30-35 months 99 08
Page 66 and 67: Table 12b. Internal Consistency of
Page 68 and 69: Table 13b. Standard Errors of Measu
Page 72 and 73: speaking children, 8.62% were Black
Page 74 and 75: Table 17b. Means, Standard Deviatio
Page 76 and 77: Table 18b. Zero-order Correlations
Page 78 and 79: Table 20. Correlations Between LAP-
Page 80 and 81: Table 23 depicts the means, standar
Page 82 and 83: Age Equivalent ScoresAn age equival
Page 85 and 86: ReferencesAmerican Educational Rese
Page 87 and 88: Errata for theExaminer’s Manual &
Page 89 and 90: Table A-1. Percentile Rank, NCE, t-
Page 91 and 92: Table B-2. Percentile Ranks for LAP
Page 99 and 100: Table B-10. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 105 and 106: 30-35 MONTHS 36-41 MONTHS 42-47 MON
Page 107 and 108: 30-35 MONTHS 36-41 MONTHS 42-47 MON
Page 109 and 110: Table C-1. Percentile Ranks for LAP
Page 119 and 120: Table C-11. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 121 and 122:
Table C-13. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 123 and 124:
Table C-15. Percentile Ranks for To
Page 125:
Table C-16. Spanish Age Equivalents
show all

Examiner's Manual & Technical Report - Kaplanco.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?