Examiner's Manual & Technical Report - Kaplanco.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LeMay, A. R. (1977). The Learning Accomplishment Profile. Winston-Salem, NC: Kaplan Press.Lillie, D. L. (1975). Early childhood education. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Mardell-Czudnowski, C. & Goldenberg, D. S. (1998). Developmental Indicators for the Assessmentof Learning, Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.McCall, R. (1970). The use of multivariate procedures in developmental psychology. In Mussen, P.H.(Ed.).Carmichael’s manual of child psychology. New York: John Wiley.Sanford, A. R. (1970). The Learning Accomplishment Profile (LAP). Winston-Salem, NC: Kaplan.Sanford, A.R., Zelman, J.G. (1981,1995). Learning Accomplishment Profile-Revised Edition (LAP-R). Lewisville, NC: Kaplan Press.Sanford, A.R., Zelman, J.G., Hardin, B.J., & Peisner-Feinberg, E.S. (2004). LearningAccomplishment Profile-Third Edition (LAP-3). Lewisville, NC: Kaplan Press.Terman, Lewis M., and Merrill, Maud. (1937). Measuring Intelligence: A Guide to theAdministration of the New Revised Stanford-Binet Tests of Intelligence. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.US Census Bureau (2000). Current Population Survey, March 2000. Washington, D.C.: United StatesGovernment.U. S. Census Bureau. (2001). Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, for Counties andPlaces. U. S. Census Bureau. Available:http:// pbis.state.nc.us/pls/census/webdb.dyn_cen00_pl_hier_i.show?p_arg_names=lvl&p_a.....Woodcock, R.W., & Johnson, M.B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised.Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.Woodcock, R.W., & Muñoz-Sandoval, A.F. (1990). Batería Woodcock-Muñoz. Itasca, IL: RiversidePublishing Company.78
Errata for theExaminer’s Manual & Technical ReportThe attached sheets contain revised tables for the sections of:APPENDIX AAPPENDIX BAPPENDIX Cof the Examiner’s Manual & Technical Report, Kaplan item#11954.Please review the attached letter on page twofor specific changes that were incurred.These errors will be corrected on the next printing of theExaminer’s Manual & Technical Report.Please use the tables attached on the following pagesfor all assessments going forward from this date.TABLES REVISED OCTOBER 2006
Page 3 and 4:
Initial DevelopmentDavid Wilson LeM
Page 6 and 7:
About the AuthorsBelinda J. Hardin
Page 8 and 9:
Interpreting LAP-D Profiles........
Page 10 and 11:
validity, in English and Spanish?
Page 12 and 13:
the LAP-D Third Edition is comprise
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 2Overview of the LAP-DThis
Page 17 and 18:
egression procedures. This study ex
Page 19 and 20:
Table 1. Subscales of the LAP-DDoma
Page 21:
LAP-D Scoring Booklet. The Scoring
Page 24 and 25:
ecomes inattentive or severely dist
Page 26 and 27:
--When borrowing a month, borrow 30
Page 28 and 29:
Determining Starting PointsOnce the
Page 30 and 31:
Scoring Procedures RulesOnce the st
Page 32 and 33:
Figure 3a. Determining the BasalJOR
Page 34 and 35:
Ceiling RulesThe child’s ceiling
Page 36 and 37: Additional Scoring Rules1. Administ
Page 38 and 39: Figure 5. Computing Raw ScoresDEVAG
Page 40 and 41: complete the Scoring Summary & Prof
Page 42 and 43: Figure 7: Shanika’s Scoring Summa
Page 44 and 45: Figure 9: Alan’s Scoring Summary
Page 46 and 47: Communicating Assessment Results to
Page 48 and 49: of training and experience required
Page 50 and 51: sessions, one to three weeks apart,
Page 52 and 53: Changes were made to the translatio
Page 54 and 55: 60-65 months 183 62.4 001.8 194 62.
Page 56 and 57: Table 6. Adults and Number of Child
Page 58 and 59: Prior to selection of the criterion
Page 60 and 61: additional 409 children (19.5%; n=2
Page 62 and 63: means, standard deviations, and cor
Page 64 and 65: • Comprehension30-35 months 99 08
Page 66 and 67: Table 12b. Internal Consistency of
Page 68 and 69: Table 13b. Standard Errors of Measu
Page 70 and 71: Test-retest reliability was determi
Page 72 and 73: speaking children, 8.62% were Black
Page 74 and 75: Table 17b. Means, Standard Deviatio
Page 76 and 77: Table 18b. Zero-order Correlations
Page 78 and 79: Table 20. Correlations Between LAP-
Page 80 and 81: Table 23 depicts the means, standar
Page 82 and 83: Age Equivalent ScoresAn age equival
Page 85: ReferencesAmerican Educational Rese
Page 89 and 90: Table A-1. Percentile Rank, NCE, t-
Page 91 and 92: Table B-2. Percentile Ranks for LAP
Page 99 and 100: Table B-10. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 105 and 106: 30-35 MONTHS 36-41 MONTHS 42-47 MON
Page 107 and 108: 30-35 MONTHS 36-41 MONTHS 42-47 MON
Page 109 and 110: Table C-1. Percentile Ranks for LAP
Page 119 and 120: Table C-11. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 121 and 122: Table C-13. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 123 and 124: Table C-15. Percentile Ranks for To
Page 125: Table C-16. Spanish Age Equivalents
show all

Examiner's Manual & Technical Report - Kaplanco.com

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?