Examiner's Manual & Technical Report - Kaplanco.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 18b. Zero-order Correlations (below diagonal) and Partial Correlations (above diagonal) Controllingfor Age Among LAP-D Subscales for English-Speaking Children in the Core Sample (n=1075)FM M FM W COG M COG C LNG N LNG C GM B GM OFM M .37 .49 .33 .30 .40 .32 .26FM W .79 .44 .41 .39 .29 .26 .11CG M .82 .82 .44 .39 .43 .27 .16CG C .74 .79 .79 .55 .55 .20 .13LN N .72 .77 .76 .81 .79 .19 .10LN C .75 .72 .77 .81 .52 .27 .22GM B .78 .78 .78 .73 .71 .72 .29GM O .71 .67 .68 .65 .62 .66 .75Note: For all correlations, p
Table 19b. Zero-order Correlations (below diagonal) and Partial Correlations (above diagonal) Controllingfor Age Among LAP-D Subscales for Spanish-Speaking Children in the Core Sample (n=947)FM M FM W COG M COG C LNG N LNG C GM B GM OFM M .26 .42 .19 .20 .31 .29 .22FM W .80 .39 .33 .34 .36 .24 .13CG M .85 .84 .23 .28 .33 .35 .34CG C .70 .75 .71 .40 .41 .19 .09LN N .71 .76 .75 .73 .80 .23 .04LN C .75 .77 .77 .74 .52 .24 .08GM B .81 .80 .83 .70 .73 .73 .31GM O .74 .70 .75 .61 .60 .63 .77Note: For all correlations, p
Page 3 and 4:
Initial DevelopmentDavid Wilson LeM
Page 6 and 7:
About the AuthorsBelinda J. Hardin
Page 8 and 9:
Interpreting LAP-D Profiles........
Page 10 and 11:
validity, in English and Spanish?
Page 12 and 13:
the LAP-D Third Edition is comprise
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 2Overview of the LAP-DThis
Page 17 and 18:
egression procedures. This study ex
Page 19 and 20:
Table 1. Subscales of the LAP-DDoma
Page 21:
LAP-D Scoring Booklet. The Scoring
Page 24 and 25:
ecomes inattentive or severely dist
Page 26 and 27: --When borrowing a month, borrow 30
Page 28 and 29: Determining Starting PointsOnce the
Page 30 and 31: Scoring Procedures RulesOnce the st
Page 32 and 33: Figure 3a. Determining the BasalJOR
Page 34 and 35: Ceiling RulesThe child’s ceiling
Page 36 and 37: Additional Scoring Rules1. Administ
Page 38 and 39: Figure 5. Computing Raw ScoresDEVAG
Page 40 and 41: complete the Scoring Summary & Prof
Page 42 and 43: Figure 7: Shanika’s Scoring Summa
Page 44 and 45: Figure 9: Alan’s Scoring Summary
Page 46 and 47: Communicating Assessment Results to
Page 48 and 49: of training and experience required
Page 50 and 51: sessions, one to three weeks apart,
Page 52 and 53: Changes were made to the translatio
Page 54 and 55: 60-65 months 183 62.4 001.8 194 62.
Page 56 and 57: Table 6. Adults and Number of Child
Page 58 and 59: Prior to selection of the criterion
Page 60 and 61: additional 409 children (19.5%; n=2
Page 62 and 63: means, standard deviations, and cor
Page 64 and 65: • Comprehension30-35 months 99 08
Page 66 and 67: Table 12b. Internal Consistency of
Page 68 and 69: Table 13b. Standard Errors of Measu
Page 70 and 71: Test-retest reliability was determi
Page 72 and 73: speaking children, 8.62% were Black
Page 74 and 75: Table 17b. Means, Standard Deviatio
Page 78 and 79: Table 20. Correlations Between LAP-
Page 80 and 81: Table 23 depicts the means, standar
Page 82 and 83: Age Equivalent ScoresAn age equival
Page 85 and 86: ReferencesAmerican Educational Rese
Page 87 and 88: Errata for theExaminer’s Manual &
Page 89 and 90: Table A-1. Percentile Rank, NCE, t-
Page 91 and 92: Table B-2. Percentile Ranks for LAP
Page 99 and 100: Table B-10. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 105 and 106: 30-35 MONTHS 36-41 MONTHS 42-47 MON
Page 107 and 108: 30-35 MONTHS 36-41 MONTHS 42-47 MON
Page 109 and 110: Table C-1. Percentile Ranks for LAP
Page 119 and 120: Table C-11. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 121 and 122: Table C-13. Percentile Ranks for LA
Page 123 and 124: Table C-15. Percentile Ranks for To
Page 125: Table C-16. Spanish Age Equivalents
show all

Examiner's Manual & Technical Report - Kaplanco.com

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?