12.07.2015 Views

EMS System Review - State of New Jersey

EMS System Review - State of New Jersey

EMS System Review - State of New Jersey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong>, DHSS, O<strong>EMS</strong>Consulting Services: <strong>EMS</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Review</strong>• ETA <strong>of</strong> the helicopter including travel and patient transfer time.• Patient entrapment and predicted extrication time.• Number <strong>of</strong> patients seriously injuredGenerally, if the ground transport travel time is greater than 30 minutes, air medicaltransport is appropriate. If the ground transport time is between 20-30 minutes, the providershould carefully consider the above factors in determining the mode <strong>of</strong> transport. If the transporttime is less than 20 minutes and there are no mitigating circumstances, then ground transport isusually appropriate. 53The above guidelines are not strict protocols. In the future, these guidelines may becomestandards because <strong>of</strong> financial reasons. This will be discussed further in the financial section.How Should Service Be Provided – Considerable differences <strong>of</strong> opinion permeatethe <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> <strong>EMS</strong> system in regard to provision <strong>of</strong> air medical <strong>EMS</strong>. Until 2005, J<strong>EMS</strong>TARwas the exclusive provider throughout the state. Private air medical providers were able toconvince the NJO<strong>EMS</strong> to license them to provide inter-facility transports and as back-up forJ<strong>EMS</strong>TAR. Since then, private companies have attempted to become primary providers forspecific areas.A prevailing question is that <strong>of</strong> the interpretation <strong>of</strong> being “closest to the incident.” Whilethis sounds simple, it is actually very complex. To determine “closest to the incident” the systemmust consider several factors including: nautical miles, interval from alert to being en route,speed capability <strong>of</strong> the helicopter, and the ability to find a suitable landing zone close to thescene. J<strong>EMS</strong>TAR helicopters are on wheels and can quickly move from the hanger to the take<strong>of</strong>fzone. The other helicopters are towed to a take<strong>of</strong>f zone, which adds time to their response.The Sikorsky helicopters used by J<strong>EMS</strong>TAR units can fly at 175 MPH, faster than those <strong>of</strong> otherservices.Recommendation 38: Select <strong>of</strong>ten used helicopter landing areas and using the abovevariables, pre-determine the closest units. Upgrade REMCS and helicopter units with theappropriate tracking devices that can determine the closest units.In June 2007, J<strong>EMS</strong>TAR submitted an updated draft protocol for the dispatch <strong>of</strong>commercial air medical units. The protocol was suggested in order to provide effective oversight,limit the state from restraint <strong>of</strong> trade liability and assure quality patient care. The basic provisos<strong>of</strong> this draft were:53 NJO<strong>EMS</strong>. (n.d.). Helicopter Response Program Ambulance vs. Air Transport: Fly or Drive? Available [online.].http://www.state.nj.us/health/ems/flydrive.htm.TriData, a Division <strong>of</strong> 101September 2007<strong>System</strong> Planning Corporation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!