12.07.2015 Views

EMS System Review - State of New Jersey

EMS System Review - State of New Jersey

EMS System Review - State of New Jersey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong>, DHSS, O<strong>EMS</strong>Consulting Services: <strong>EMS</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Review</strong>is needed. Primary ALS responders could respond with one paramedic and a supervisory couldrespond to calls assigned to “Level E.” If, as we recommended in Chapter 3, counties couldbecome the licensed billing agent for all <strong>EMS</strong> services, then these supervisory personnel couldplay a greater role.Commercial <strong>EMS</strong> – Commercial services that might provide ALS service but see itbeing a considerable financial and legal risk, and may find it not worth taking. Only thosecommercial services who have the capital, understand the risks and serve in areas that have theneed, should consider this venture. Commercial services should consider providing emergencyBLS services in areas that are underserved by volunteer providers.Hospital/Hospital Consortiums – While some hospitals may choose to opt out <strong>of</strong>ALS services, others may find opportunities. There are good reasons for hospitals to continueALS provision. The medical care provided is usually superior and medical oversight is usuallystrong. Those services that are willing to invest in their personnel and can remain financiallysolvent may find great benefits from continuing or adopting ALS services.<strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong>’s hospital-based system has a major flaw that prohibits full use <strong>of</strong> ALSproviders. The current 2K statute prohibits ALS (or any <strong>EMS</strong>) providers from performing skillsin a hospital setting except during training. Legislative restrictions have lead to vast under use <strong>of</strong>skilled personnel. Some believe that eliminating restrictions would improve the skills <strong>of</strong>paramedics. 67Another caution to consider is the aging workforce <strong>of</strong> hospital <strong>EMS</strong> providers, with manyALS providers being in their 50s and 60s. Adding transportation duties to these providers maylead to earlier retirements due to increased physical demands (lifting and carrying).Volunteers – There are many counties, cities and towns that rely exclusively onvolunteer ALS services. While their numbers are decreasing, some continue to provide excellentservices. This could be true in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong>, especially in areas where squads merge into strongorganizations that can guarantee response and quality management. Realistically, we believe thatthere is little interest from <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> volunteers to embark on this effort.Organizations other than hospitals can successfully provide ALS services. They canprovide full ALS services or supplemental ALS first response. Counties can take a stronger rolein assuring the best economies <strong>of</strong> scale while keeping the high level <strong>of</strong> care. There are severalcautions for organizations who are considering adopting ALS:67 IOM (2006). Emergency Medical Services at the Crossroad. Institute <strong>of</strong> Medicine. Washington, DC: NationalAcademic Press.TriData, a Division <strong>of</strong> 117September 2007<strong>System</strong> Planning Corporation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!