The Condition of Postmodernity 13 - autonomous learning

More documents

Recommendations

Info

234 The experience of space and timethe dynamics of class struggle. We can here, I think, invoke a simplerule: !hat those who commall(1.1J?
236 The experience of space and timedifferent social relations, into a common cause, but it also began, inthe 1860s , to transfer funds and material aid from one space of class.struggle to another. If the bourgeoisie could command space for Itsown class purposes, then the workers' movement could do the same.And to the degree that the First International appeared to commandgenuine power, the bourgeoisie had every reason to fear it (as ineedthey did) in exactly the same way that they had feared the ysten usroamings of Captain Swing decades before. The capacIt y to lmkworkers in united action across space has always been an Importantvariable in class struggle. To some degree Marx seemed to believethat the massing of workers in the factories and the cities of industrialcapitalism would by itself provide a sufficient g opolitical P ? werbase for class action. But the whole thrust of FIrst InternatIOnalgeopolitics was to broaden that base in as systematic a way aspossible..It is rare indeed for class action not to have to face up to Itsspecific geographical constraints. In the prolon ed mners' strike .inBritain in 1984, for example, the so-called 'flymg pIckets' movmgquickly from one pit-head to another posed an acut probl : m f?r thestate powers, which had to devise eq ally m .obde .tactIcs m ! esponse. Legislation to outlaw secondary mdustnal actIOn and flymgpickets was designed to curb working-cla s power ove sp ce and toweaken the potential for coherent class action by confillln It to pla e.The crushing of the Paris Commune, and the 1877 raIlroad stnkein the United States, demonstrated early on, however, that superiorcommand over space would usually lie with the bourgeoisie. Nevertheless, the workers' movement persisted in its internationalist vison(though with weak actual organization) up until the eve of the FIrStWorld War, when the Second International split essentially on thequestion of loyalty to nation (space) versus loyalty to class (historical)interests. The victory of the former current not only had workersfighting on both sides of what most recognized as a war .betwencapitalists, but initiated a phase of workers' movement hIstory mwhich proletarian interests always ended up, no matter what therhetoric, serving at the feet of national interests.Working-class movements are, in fact, generally better .at organizingin and dominating place than they are at commandmg space.The various revolutions that broke out in Paris in the nineteenthcentury foundered on the inability to consolidate nati?nal powerthrough a spatial strategy that would command the natIOnal space.Movements such as the Seattle general strike of 1918 (when workerseffectively took control of the city for nearly a week), the St Petersburguprising of 1905, coupled with a long and detailed history ofTime and space as sources of social power 237municipal socialism, community organization around strik .action(such as the Flint strike of 1933), through to the urban upnsmgs ofthe United States of the 1960s, all illustrate the point. On the otherhand, simultaneity of revolutionary upsurges in differe?t locations,as in 1848 or 1968, strikes fear into any ruling class preCIsely becauseits superior command over space is threatened. It is exactly in such .situations that international capitalism raises the spectre of an mternationalconspiracy, deeply offensive to national interests, and ofteninvokes the power of the latter to preserve its ability to commandspace..What is even more interesting is the political response to thISlatent power of revolutionary and worker mobilization in place. Oneof the principal tasks of the capitalist state is to locate power in thespaces which the bourgeoisie controls, and disempowe tose spaceswhich oppositional movements have the greatest potentIalIty to command.This was the principle that led France to deny self-governmentto Paris until the total embourgeoisement of the city allowed it tobecome the fiefdom of Chirac's right-wing politics. This was thesame strategy that lay behind Thatcher's abolition of metropolitangovernments like the Greater London Council (contr lled by a .Marxist left during the period 1981-85). It was also malllfest m theslow erosion of municipal and urban powers in the United Statesduring the 'progressive era' when municipal socialism appeared as areal possibility, thus making a federalization of state powers moreacceptable to the large-scale capitalists. It is i such a contex th tclass struggle also assumes its global role. Henn Lefebvre puts It thISway:Today, more than ever, the class struggle is inscribed in space.Indeed, it is that struggle alone which prevents abstract spacefrom taking over the whole planet and papering over all differences.Only the class struggle has the capacity to differentiate,to generate differences which are not intrinsic to economicgrowth ... that is to say, differences which are not eitherinduced by or acceptable to that growth.The whole history of territorial organization (see Sack, 1987), colonizationand imperialism, of uneven geographical devẹopment, .ofurban and rural contradictions, as well as of geopolItical conflIcttestifies to the importance of such struggles within the history ofcapitalism.If space is indeed to be thought of as a system of 'containers' ofsocial power (to use the imagery of Foucault), then it follows thatfl
Page 1:
The Conditionof PostmodernityAn Enq
Page 4:
PrefaceI cannot remember exactly wh
Page 7 and 8:
Introduction 5theatre, a series of
Page 9 and 10:
8 The passage from modernity to pos
Page 11 and 12:
12 The passage from modernity to po
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
24The passage from modernity to pos
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Postmodernism in the city 85Here we
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
100 The passage from modernity to p
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
7IntroductionIf there has been some
Page 67 and 68:
124 Political-economic capitalist t
Page 69 and 70:
128 Political-economic capitalist t
Page 71 and 72: 132 Political-economic capitalist t
Page 77 and 78: From Fordism to flexible accumulati
Page 79 and 80: 12 10Ql+-'l:'+-' 8CQlE>E 6Cl.EQlC4Q
Page 81 and 82: 152 political-economic capitalist t
Page 105 and 106: 12IntroductionMarshall Berman (1982
Page 107 and 108: 204 The experience of space and tim
Page 111 and 112: 212tThe experience of space and tim
Page 115 and 116: Table 3.1 A 'grid' of spatial pract
Page 117 and 118: TypeEnduringtimeDeceptivetimeErrati
Page 119 and 120: I228 The experience of space and ti
Page 121: 232 The experience of space and tim
Page 125 and 126: 15The time and space of theEnlighte
Page 129 and 130: Plate 3 5 Dynasty versus the map: t
Page 133 and 134: Time and space of the Enlightenment
Page 135 and 136: The rise of modernism as a cultural
Page 147 and 148: 17Time-space compresson and thepost
Page 159 and 160: 18Time and space In the postmodernC
Page 167 and 168: Part IVThe condition of postmoderni
Page 169 and 170: 328 The condition of postmodernityw
Page 171 and 172: 332 The condition of postmodernityC
Page 173 and 174:
21Postmodernism as the mIrror ofmIr
Page 175 and 176:
Table 4.1 Fordist modernity versus
Page 177 and 178:
344 The condition of postmodernityN
Page 179 and 180:
348 The condition of postmodernityc
Page 181 and 182:
352 The condition 0/ postmodernityf
Page 183 and 184:
27Cracks in the mIrrors, fusions at
Page 185 and 186:
ReferencesAglietta, M. (1979): A th
Page 187 and 188:
364 ReferencesJacobs, J. (1961): Th
Page 189 and 190:
Index 369Adorno, T. 13Aglietta, M.
Page 191 and 192:
372IndexSoja, E. 284Sorel, G. 34Spe
Page 193 and 194:
376IndexIndex 377jouissance 57-8, 9
show all

The Condition of Postmodernity 13 - autonomous learning

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?