6 <strong>The</strong> passage from modernity to postmodernityWhile affirmative in this sense, Raban did not pretend that all waswell with urban life. Too many people lost their way in the labyrinth,it was simply too easy for us to lose each other as well as ourselves.And if there was something liberating about the possibility <strong>of</strong> playingmany diverse roles there was also something stressful and deeplyunsettling about it. Beneath all that, lay the grumbling threat <strong>of</strong>inexplicable violence, the inevitable companion <strong>of</strong> that omni-presenttendency for social life to dissolve into total chaos. Inexplicablekillings and random urban violence in fact form the opening gambitin Raban's account. <strong>The</strong> city may be a theatre, but that meant therewere opportunities for villains and fools to strut there and turn sociallife into tragi-comedy, even violent melodrama, particularly if wefailed to read the codes right. Although we are 'necessarily dependenton surfaces and appearances' it was not always clear how we couldlearn to attend to these surfaces with the requisite sympathy andseriousness. This task was rendered doubly difficult by the waycreative entrepreneurialism had been harnessed to the task <strong>of</strong> producingfantasy and disguise, while behind all the churnings <strong>of</strong> codesand fashions lurked a certain 'imperialism <strong>of</strong> taste' that stood to recreatein new ways the very hierarchy <strong>of</strong> values and significationsthat changing fashions otherwise undermined:Signals, styles, systems <strong>of</strong> rapid, highly conventionalized communication,are the lifeblood <strong>of</strong> the big city. It is when thesesystems break down - when we lose our grasp on the grammar<strong>of</strong> urban life - that [violence] takes over. <strong>The</strong> city, our greatmodern form, is s<strong>of</strong>t, amenable to the dazzling and libidinousvariety <strong>of</strong> lives, dreams, interpretations. But the very plasticqualities which make the great city the liberator <strong>of</strong> humanidentity also cause it to be especially vulnerable to psychosisand totalitarian nightmare.<strong>The</strong>re is more than a touch <strong>of</strong> the French literary critic RolandBarthes's influence in this passage, and sure enough that writer'sclassic text Writing degree zero turns up for favourable mention onmore than one occasion. To the degree that Le Corbusier's moderniststyle <strong>of</strong> architecture (plate 1.1) is the bete noire in Raban's scheme<strong>of</strong> things, S<strong>of</strong>t city records a moment <strong>of</strong> fierce tension between one<strong>of</strong> the great heroes <strong>of</strong> the modernist movement and someone likeBarthes, who was shortly to become one <strong>of</strong> the central figures <strong>of</strong>postmodernism. S<strong>of</strong>t city, written at that moment, is a prescient textthat should itself be read not as an anti-modernist argument but as avital affirmation that the postmodernist moment has arrived.Introduction 7I waS recently reminded <strong>of</strong> Raban's evocative descriptions whilevisiting an exhibition <strong>of</strong> Cindy. Sherman's photographs (plate 1.2).<strong>The</strong> photographs depict seemingly different women drawn frommany walks <strong>of</strong> life. It takes a little while to realize, with a certainshock, that these are portraits <strong>of</strong> the same woman in different guises.Only the catalogue tells you that it is the artist herself who is thatwoman. <strong>The</strong> parallel with Raban's insistence upon the plasticity <strong>of</strong>human personality through the malleability <strong>of</strong> appearances and surfacesis striking, as is the self-referential positioning <strong>of</strong> the authors tothemselves as subjects. Cindy Sherman is considered a major figurein the postmodern movement.So what is this postmodernism <strong>of</strong> which many now speak? Hassocial life so changed since the early 1970s that we can reasonablytalk about living in a postmodern culture, a postmodern age? Or isit simply that trends in high culture have taken, as is their wont, yetanother twist, and that academic fashions have also changed withscarcely a ripple <strong>of</strong> effect or an echo <strong>of</strong> correspondence in the dailylife <strong>of</strong> ordinary citizens? Raban's book suggests that there is more tomatters than the latest intellectual fad imported from Paris or thelatest twirl in the New York art market. <strong>The</strong>re is more to it, too,than the shift in architectural style that Jencks (1984) records, thoughhere we approach a realm that has the potential to bring high culturalconcerns closer to daily life through the production <strong>of</strong> built form.Major changes have indeed occured in the qualities <strong>of</strong> urban lifesince 1970 or so. But whether such shifts deserve the appellation <strong>of</strong>'postmodern' is another question. <strong>The</strong> answer depends rather directly,<strong>of</strong> course, on exactly what we might mean by that term. And herewe do have to grapple with the latest intellectual fads imported fromParis and twists in the New York art market, because it is out <strong>of</strong>those ferments that the concept <strong>of</strong> the 'postmodern' has emerged.No one exactly agrees as to what is meant by the term, except,perhaps, that 'postmodernism' represents some kind <strong>of</strong> reaction to,or departure from, 'modernism'. Since the meaning <strong>of</strong> modernism isalso very confused, the reaction or departure known as 'postmodernism'is doubly so. <strong>The</strong> literary critic Terry Eagleton (1987) tries todefine the term as follows:<strong>The</strong>re is, perhaps, a degree <strong>of</strong> consensus that the typical postmodernistartefact is playful, self-ironizing and even schizoid;and that it reacts to the austere autonomy <strong>of</strong> high modernismby impudently embracing the language <strong>of</strong> commerce and thecommodity. Its stance towards cultural tradition is one <strong>of</strong>irreverent ·pastiche, and its contrived depthlessness undermines
8 <strong>The</strong> passage from modernity to postmodernityPlate 1.2 Cindy Sherman, Untitled, 1983 and Untitled #92, 1981.Postmodernism and the mask: Cindy Sherman's photographic art uses herselfas a subject in multiple disguises, many <strong>of</strong> which make overt reference to filmor media images.all metaphysical solemnities, sometimes by a brutal aesthetics <strong>of</strong>squalor and shock.Introduction 9to the 'monotomy' <strong>of</strong> universal modernism's VISIOn <strong>of</strong> the world.'Generally perceived as positivistic, technocentric, and rationalistic,universal modernism has been identified with the belief in linearprogress, absolute truths, the rational planning <strong>of</strong> ideal social orders,and the standardization <strong>of</strong> knowledge and production.' Postmodernism,by way <strong>of</strong> contrast, privileges 'heterogeneity and differenceas liberative forces in the redefinition <strong>of</strong> cultural discourse.'Fragmentation, indeterminacy, and intense distrust <strong>of</strong> all universal or'totalizing' discourses (to use the favoured phrase) are the hallmark<strong>of</strong> postmodernist thought. <strong>The</strong> rediscovery <strong>of</strong> pragmatism in philosophy(e. g. Rorty, 1979), the shift <strong>of</strong> ideas about the philosophy<strong>of</strong> science wrought by Kuhn (1962) and Feyerabend (1975), Foucault'semphasis upon discontinuity and difference in history and his privileging<strong>of</strong> 'polymorphous correlations in place <strong>of</strong> simple or complexcasuality,' new developments in mathematics emphasizing indeterminacy(catastrophe and chaos theory, fractal geometry), the reemergence<strong>of</strong> concern in ethics, politics, and anthropology for thevalidity and dignity <strong>of</strong> 'the other,' all indicate a widespread andpr<strong>of</strong>ound shift in 'the structure <strong>of</strong> feeling.' What all these exampleshave in common is a rejection <strong>of</strong> 'meta-narratives' (large-scale theoreticalinterpretations purportedly <strong>of</strong> universal application), whichleads Eagleton to complete his description <strong>of</strong> postmodernism thus:Post-modernism signals the death <strong>of</strong> such 'metanarratives'whose secretly terroristic function was to ground and legitimatethe illusion <strong>of</strong> a 'universal' human history. We are now in theprocess <strong>of</strong> wakening from the nightmare <strong>of</strong> modernity, with itsmanipulative reason and fetish <strong>of</strong> the totality, into the laid-backpluralism <strong>of</strong> the post-modern, that heterogeneous range <strong>of</strong> lifestylesand language games which has renounced the nostalgicurge to totalize and legitimate itself . ... Science and philosophymust jettison their grandiose metaphysical claims and view themselvesmore modestly as just another set <strong>of</strong> narratives.If these depictions are correct, then it would certainly seem as ifRaban's S<strong>of</strong>t city is suffused with postmodernist sentiment. But thereal import <strong>of</strong> that has still to be established. Since the only agreedpoint <strong>of</strong> departure for understanding the postmodern is in its purportedrelation to the modern, it is to the meaning <strong>of</strong> the latter termthat I shall first attend.In more positive vein, the editors <strong>of</strong> the architectural journalPRECIS 6 (1987, 7-24) see postmodernism as a legitimate reaction
- Page 1: The Conditionof PostmodernityAn Enq
- Page 4: PrefaceI cannot remember exactly wh
- Page 7: Introduction 5theatre, a series of
- Page 11 and 12: 12 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 13 and 14: 16 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 15 and 16: 20 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 17 and 18: 24The passage from modernity to pos
- Page 19 and 20: 28 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 21 and 22: 32 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 23 and 24: 36 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 25 and 26: 40 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 27 and 28: 44 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 29 and 30: 48 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 31 and 32: 52 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 33 and 34: 56 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 35 and 36: 60 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 37 and 38: 64 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 39 and 40: 68 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 41 and 42: 72 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 43 and 44: 76 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 45 and 46: 80 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 47 and 48: Postmodernism in the city 85Here we
- Page 49 and 50: 88 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 51 and 52: 92 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 53 and 54: 96 The passage from modernity to po
- Page 55 and 56: 100 The passage from modernity to p
- Page 57 and 58: 104 The passage from modernity to p
- Page 59 and 60:
108 The passage from modernity to p
- Page 61 and 62:
112 The passage from modernity to p
- Page 63 and 64:
116 The passage from modernity to p
- Page 65 and 66:
7IntroductionIf there has been some
- Page 67 and 68:
124 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 69 and 70:
128 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 71 and 72:
132 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 73 and 74:
136 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 75 and 76:
140 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 77 and 78:
From Fordism to flexible accumulati
- Page 79 and 80:
12 10Ql+-'l:'+-' 8CQlE>E 6Cl.EQlC4Q
- Page 81 and 82:
152 political-economic capitalist t
- Page 83 and 84:
156 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 85 and 86:
160 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 87 and 88:
164 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 89 and 90:
168 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 91 and 92:
172 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 93 and 94:
176 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 95 and 96:
180 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 97 and 98:
184 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 99 and 100:
188 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 101 and 102:
192 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 103 and 104:
196 Political-economic capitalist t
- Page 105 and 106:
12IntroductionMarshall Berman (1982
- Page 107 and 108:
204 The experience of space and tim
- Page 109 and 110:
208 The experience of space and tim
- Page 111 and 112:
212tThe experience of space and tim
- Page 113 and 114:
216 The experience of space and tim
- Page 115 and 116:
Table 3.1 A 'grid' of spatial pract
- Page 117 and 118:
TypeEnduringtimeDeceptivetimeErrati
- Page 119 and 120:
I228 The experience of space and ti
- Page 121 and 122:
232 The experience of space and tim
- Page 123 and 124:
236 The experience of space and tim
- Page 125 and 126:
15The time and space of theEnlighte
- Page 127 and 128:
244 The experience of space and tim
- Page 129 and 130:
Plate 3 5 Dynasty versus the map: t
- Page 131 and 132:
252 The experience of space and tim
- Page 133 and 134:
Time and space of the Enlightenment
- Page 135 and 136:
The rise of modernism as a cultural
- Page 137 and 138:
264 The experience of space and tim
- Page 139 and 140:
268 The experience of space and tim
- Page 141 and 142:
272 The experience of space and tim
- Page 143 and 144:
276 The experience of space and tim
- Page 145 and 146:
280 The experience of space and tim
- Page 147 and 148:
17Time-space compresson and thepost
- Page 149 and 150:
288 The experience of space and tim
- Page 151 and 152:
292 The experience of space and tim
- Page 153 and 154:
296 The experience of space and tim
- Page 155 and 156:
300 The experience of space and tim
- Page 157 and 158:
304 The experience of space and tim
- Page 159 and 160:
18Time and space In the postmodernC
- Page 161 and 162:
312 The experience of space and tim
- Page 163 and 164:
316 The experience of space and tim
- Page 165 and 166:
320 The experience of space and tim
- Page 167 and 168:
Part IVThe condition of postmoderni
- Page 169 and 170:
328 The condition of postmodernityw
- Page 171 and 172:
332 The condition of postmodernityC
- Page 173 and 174:
21Postmodernism as the mIrror ofmIr
- Page 175 and 176:
Table 4.1 Fordist modernity versus
- Page 177 and 178:
344 The condition of postmodernityN
- Page 179 and 180:
348 The condition of postmodernityc
- Page 181 and 182:
352 The condition 0/ postmodernityf
- Page 183 and 184:
27Cracks in the mIrrors, fusions at
- Page 185 and 186:
ReferencesAglietta, M. (1979): A th
- Page 187 and 188:
364 ReferencesJacobs, J. (1961): Th
- Page 189 and 190:
Index 369Adorno, T. 13Aglietta, M.
- Page 191 and 192:
372IndexSoja, E. 284Sorel, G. 34Spe
- Page 193 and 194:
376IndexIndex 377jouissance 57-8, 9