The Condition of Postmodernity 13 - autonomous learning

More documents

Recommendations

Info

358 The condition of postmodernitywhelming symbolic order, internalizes certain contradictions whichat a certain point become more and more self-evident. When Lyotard,for example, seeks to keep his radical hopes alive by appeal to somepristine and unsullied concept of justice, he proposes a truth statementthat lies above the melee of interest groups and their cacophonyof language games. When Hillis Miller is forced to appeal to liberaland positivist values to defend his mentor Paul de Man against whathe considers the calumny of false ' accusations, then he, too, invokesuniversals.And at the edges of these trends there are all sorts of fusions of thefragments in progress. Jesse Jackson employs charismatic politics in apolitical campaign which nevertheless begins to fuse some of thesocial movements in the United States that have long been apatheticto each other. The very possibility of a genuine rainbow coalitiondefines a unified politics which inevitably speaks the tacit languageof class, because this is precisely what defines the common experiencewithin the differences. US trade union leaders finally begin to worrythat their support for foreign dictatorships in the name of anticommunismsince 1950, has promoted the unfair labour practices andlow wages in many countries which now compete for jobs and investment.And when British Ford ,car workers struck and stopped carproduction in Belgium and West Germany, they suddenly realizedthat spatial dispersal in the division of labour is not entirely to thecapitalists' advantage and international strategies are feasible as wellas desirable. Signs of a new internationalism in the ecological sphere(forced by events for the bourgeoisie, sought out actively by manyecological groups) and in the fight against racism, apartheid, worldhunger, uneven geographical development, are everywhere, even ifmuch of it still lies in the realm of pure image making (like BandAid) rather than in political organization. The geopolitical stressbetween East and West also undergoes a notable amelioration (again,no thanks to the ruling classes in the West, but more because of anevolution in the East).The cracks in the mirror may not be too wide, and the fusions atthe edges may not be too striking, but the fact that all are theresuggests that the condition of postmodernity is undergoing a subtleevolution, perhaps reaching a point of self-dissolution into somethingdifferent. But what?Answers to that cannot be rendered in abstraction from the politicaleconomicforces currently transforming the world of labour, finance,uneven geographical development, and the like. The lines oftension are clear enough. Geopolitics and economic nationalism,localism and the politics of place, are all fighting it out with a newinternationalism in the most contradictory of ways. The fusion ofCracks in the mirrors, fusions at the edgesthe European Economic Community as a commodity trading blocktakes place in 1992; takeovers and merger manias will sweep thecontinent; yet Thatcherism still proclaims itself as a distinctivenational project resting upon the peculiarities of the British (a propositionwhich both left and right politics tend to accept). Internationalcontrol over finance capital looks inevitable, yet it seemsimpossible to arrive at that through the collectivity of national interests.In the intellectual and cultural spheres similar oppositionscan be identified.Wenders seems to propose a new romanticism, the exploration ofglobal meanings and the prospects for Becoming through the releaseof romantic desire out of the stasis of Being. There are dangers inreleasing an unknown and perhaps uncontrollable aesthetic powerinto an unstable situation. Brandon Taylor favours a return to realismas a means to bring cultural practices back into a realm where somekind of explicit ethical content can be expressed. Even some of thedeconstructionists seem to be reverting to ethics.Beyond that there is a renewal of historical materialism and of theEnlightenment project. Through the first we can begin to understandpostmodernity as an historical-geographical condition. On thatcritical basis it becomes possible to launch a counter-attack of narrativeagainst the image, of ethics against aesthetics, of a project ofBecoming rather than Being, and to search for unity within difference,albeit in a context where the power of the image and of aesthetics,the problems of time-space compression, and the significance ofgeopolitics and otherness are clearly understood. A renewal of historical-geographicalmaterialism can indeed promote adherence toa new version of the Enlightenment project. Poggioli (1968, 73)captures the difference thus:In the consciousness of the classical epoch, it is not the presentthat brings the past into culmination, but the past that culminatesin the present, and the present is in turn understood asa new triumph of ancient and eternal values, as a return to theprinciple of the true and the just, as a restoration or re-birth ofthose principles. But for the moderns, the present is valid onlyby virtue of the potentialities of the future, as the matrix of thefuture, insofar as it is the forge of history in continued metamorphosis,seen as a permanent spiritual revolution.There are some who would have us return to classicism and otherswho seek to tread the path of the moderns. From the standpoint ofthe latter, every age is judged to attain 'the fullness of its time, notby being but by becoming.' I could not agree more.359
ReferencesAglietta, M. (1979): A theory of capitalist regulation. London.Arac, J. (ed.) (1986): Post modernism and politics. Manchester.Aragon, L. (1971): Paris peasant. London.Archives Nationales (1987): Espace franr;ais. Paris.Armstrong, P., Glyn, A, and Harrison, J. (1984): Capitalism since WorldWar II. London.Aronowitz, S. (1981): The crisis of historical materialism. New York.... Bachelard, G. (1964): The poetics of space. Boston, Mass.Banham, R. (1986): A concrete Atlantis: U.S. industrial building and Europeanmodern architecture. Cambridge, Mass.Barthes, R. (1967): Writing degree zero. London.Barthes, R. (1975): The pleasure of the text. New York.Baudelaire, C. (1981): Selected writing on art and artists. London.Baudrillard, J. (1981): For a critique of the political economy of the sign.St Louis, Mo.Baudrillard, J. (1986): L'Amerique. Paris.Bell, D. (1978): The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York.Benjamin, W. (1969): Illuminations. New York.-Berman, M. (1982): All that is solid melts into air. New York.Bernstein, R. (ed.) (1985): H abermas and modernity. Oxford.Blitz, M. (1981): Heidegger's Being and Time: and the possibility of politicalphilosophy. Ithaca, NY.Block, F. (1977): The origins of international economic disorder: a study ofthe United States international policy since World War II to the present.Berkeley, Calif.Bluestone, B. and Harrison, B. (1982): The deindustrialization of America.New York.Borges, J. (1972): The chronicles of Bustos-Domecq. New York.- Bourdieu, P. (1977): Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge.-Bourdieu, P. (1984): Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste.London.Bove, P. (1986): 'The ineluctability of difference: scientific pluralism and thecritical intelligence.' In Arac (ed.)References 361Boyer, M. (1988): 'The return of aesthetics to city planning.' Society, 25 (4),49-56.Boyer, R. (1986a): La flexibilite du travail en Europe. Paris.Boyer, R. (1986b): La tMorie de la regulation: une analyse critique. Paris.Bradbury, M. and McFarlane, J. (1976): Modernism, 1890-1930. Harmondsworth.Braverman, H. (1974): Labor and monopoly capital. New York.Bruno, G. (1987): 'Ramble city: postmodernism and Blade Runner.' October41, 61-74.Burawoy, M. (1979): Manufacturing consent: changes in the labor processunder monopoly capitalism. Chicago, Ill.-Biirger, P. (1984): Theory of the avant-garde. Manchester.Calvino, 1. (1981): If on a winter's night a traveler. New York.Caro, R. (1974): The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York.New York.Cassirer, E. (1951): The philosophy of the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ._ Chambers, 1. (1986): Popular culture: the metropolitan experience. London.Chambers, 1. (1987): 'Maps for the metropolis; a possible guide to thepresent.' Cultural Studies, 1, 1-22.Clark, T. J. (1985): The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manetand his followers. New York.Coalition for the Homeless, New York City (1987): Forgotten voices,unforgettable dreams. New York._ Cohen, S. and Taylor, L. (1978); Escape attempts: the theory and practice ofresistance to everyday life . Harmondsworth.Cohen-Solal, A. (1987): 'The lovers' contract.' The Observer, 11 October1987.Collins, G. and Collins, C. (1986): Camillo Sitte: the birth of modern cityplanning. New York.Colquhoun, A. (1985): 'On modern and post-modern space.' In PrincetonArchitectural Press.Crimp, D. (1983): 'On the museum's ruins.' In H. Foster (ed.).Crimp, D. (1987): 'Art in the 80s: the myth of autonomy.' PRECIS 6,83-91.Dahrendorf, R. (1987): 'The erosion of citizenship and its consequences forus all.' New Statesman, 12 June 1987.Daniels, P. (1985): Service industries: a geographical appraisal. London.Davidson, J. D. and Rees-Mogg, W. (1988): Blood in the streets. London.Davis, M. (1986): Prisoners of the American dream. London... de Certeau, M. (1984): The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, Calif.
Page 1:
The Conditionof PostmodernityAn Enq
Page 4:
PrefaceI cannot remember exactly wh
Page 7 and 8:
Introduction 5theatre, a series of
Page 9 and 10:
8 The passage from modernity to pos
Page 11 and 12:
12 The passage from modernity to po
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
24The passage from modernity to pos
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Postmodernism in the city 85Here we
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
100 The passage from modernity to p
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
7IntroductionIf there has been some
Page 67 and 68:
124 Political-economic capitalist t
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
From Fordism to flexible accumulati
Page 79 and 80:
12 10Ql+-'l:'+-' 8CQlE>E 6Cl.EQlC4Q
Page 81 and 82:
152 political-economic capitalist t
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
12IntroductionMarshall Berman (1982
Page 107 and 108:
204 The experience of space and tim
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
212tThe experience of space and tim
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Table 3.1 A 'grid' of spatial pract
Page 117 and 118:
TypeEnduringtimeDeceptivetimeErrati
Page 119 and 120:
I228 The experience of space and ti
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
15The time and space of theEnlighte
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Plate 3 5 Dynasty versus the map: t
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134: Time and space of the Enlightenment
Page 135 and 136: The rise of modernism as a cultural
Page 137 and 138: 264 The experience of space and tim
Page 147 and 148: 17Time-space compresson and thepost
Page 159 and 160: 18Time and space In the postmodernC
Page 167 and 168: Part IVThe condition of postmoderni
Page 169 and 170: 328 The condition of postmodernityw
Page 171 and 172: 332 The condition of postmodernityC
Page 173 and 174: 21Postmodernism as the mIrror ofmIr
Page 175 and 176: Table 4.1 Fordist modernity versus
Page 177 and 178: 344 The condition of postmodernityN
Page 179 and 180: 348 The condition of postmodernityc
Page 181 and 182: 352 The condition 0/ postmodernityf
Page 183: 27Cracks in the mIrrors, fusions at
Page 187 and 188: 364 ReferencesJacobs, J. (1961): Th
Page 189 and 190: Index 369Adorno, T. 13Aglietta, M.
Page 191 and 192: 372IndexSoja, E. 284Sorel, G. 34Spe
Page 193 and 194: 376IndexIndex 377jouissance 57-8, 9
show all

The Condition of Postmodernity 13 - autonomous learning

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?