12.07.2015 Views

Untitled - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

Untitled - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

Untitled - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 2. Coupled mass transfer and sol-gel reaction in a two-phase bulk system43.53experiment T = 20 o Cexperiment T = 40 o Cmodel T = 20 o Cmodel T = 40 o C2.5T 1[s]21.510.500 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1φFig. 2.7: Relaxation time T 1 of TMOS/n-hexadecane mixtures as a function of concentration φafter interpolation of the experimental data for different temperatures. The predictedT 1 , based on Eqs. 2.14 - 2.16, is shown as well.the mono-exponential decay function in order to compare the calculated values to theexperimental results. The comparison is shown in Figure 2.7 for T = 20 ◦ C and T =40 ◦ C. An excellent match between the calculated and the experimental T 1 is found for0 < φ < 0.4. At higher concentrations the difference is larger but within 10% of theexperimental value.Relaxation in prepared gelsThe relaxation times of the prepared gel samples were measured after 14 days of preparationand at ambient temperature. In Table 2.2 the results are summarized togetherwith T 1 and T 2 for water, methanol, mixtures of water and methanol, and TMOS, whichare substances involved in the sol-gel reaction. The longitudinal relaxation in the gelsappeared to be mono-exponential. For the lowest initial concentration of TMOS (φ g T =0.05), T 1 is almost equal to that of water, but decreases with increasing concentration.Between φ g T = 0.30 and φg T = 0.50, T 1 is constant (about 1.70 s). The reduction of T 1of the wet gels with respect to T 1 of water is thus limited to about 50% for the range ofconcentrations considered.The CPMG data were analyzed using the inversion routine CONTIN. The T 2 spectraof water and TMOS appeared to be mono-exponential. Subsequent fitting of the datawith a single exponent yielded a T 2 of 1.66 s and 1.33 s for water, respectively, TMOS(with G = 100 mT/m and ∆τ E = 7.2 ms). The differences between T 2 and T 1 for waterand TMOS are explained by the effect of molecular diffusion (see Section 2.3.2).The gel T 2 spectra and the T 2 spectra of water/methanol showed a multi-exponentialbehavior with well-separated components within the range of the inversion. Additionally,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!