hearing

Recommendations

Info

121cherce c ontir.. the ro,:ect. if these probabilities appearzurficient to chtain an adequate return for the expenditure, therecan be no legal objection to this aspect of the project.5. It should be noted that there are two Circumstances whichrequire consideration in a final determination. As stated inSection V, our contribution, by appearing to be from a privatesource, would increase the matching Government contribution by asimilar amount which would not be the case if it were known thatthis was in fact a Government contributicn also. Secondly, it isthe stated policy of the hospital tb charge the Government endcommercial organizations 80 per cent overhead on research contracts,whereas nonprofit foxundations pay only direct costs but no overhead.Because of the ostensible source, our projects will not be chargedoverhead. This could be construed -as mbrally wrongful to thehospital,- .as normally we would pay the 80 Per cent overheadcharge for projects performed directly for us, but I believethis can be offset, at least to the amount of our donation, andperhaps by the further a:ount by which the other Government contributionsare increased by our dcnation. In any case, if theproject is a proper one and must be performed in this manner,security dictates these circu'stances and they, therefore, donot present a legal obstacle as such.6. We raised the question whether funds for the hospitalconstruction could not be obtained from other normal charitablesources. It appeared that there was a sting possibtility thatthe individual concerned could raise adequate funds from privateresources, but it was the position of TSS that if this were thecase we would not obtain the-commitment from the individual andthe degree of control which this project is desiGned to achieve.IAWHRENCE R. HOUSTONGeneral Counsel-!:'ar~oed to:thsrit of : 1874757!- 2q77Dorngraded to:by authority -: 27-173Iatc: JUIDo 117722 IITDE:Z; CL E713:7Copy # 1 of 1 copy
1228 April 1955U!VJMMIIIM FOR~:Chief, DD)/P/T-zc3SUBJECTAiendmmenTto Sub~r-T ject 35 of Frcject ZZ T 2TRAWe have noted ycur menorandiun of 6 April 1955 to theDirector reneti-an increase of YIT50,OCQ for the TZSMID budget for this Froject.l'Thie, request does not affectin any .- ray the comments in my mrecrzndauo of 21 Dacember 1954.Docnaradad to:b,. authority of: 187475c'z:J1=0 1977N:I2 I!TDET; CL B3Y 187475Coy#1ofIcp
Page 2:
PROJECT MKIULTRA, THE CIA'S PROGRAM
Page 5:
CONTESTSStatements of:PageAdmiral S
Page 10 and 11:
destruction of MKULTRA files in 197
Page 12 and 13:
and harassment substances (pp. 4, 1
Page 14 and 15:
The material in 1975 was also spars
Page 16 and 17:
Tenth, there are six subprojects on
Page 18 and 19:
or damage to their reputations whic
Page 20 and 21:
In early June, however, he discover
Page 22 and 23:
17You know, much of the research wh
Page 24 and 25:
efore, and I am hopeful we can get
Page 26 and 27:
Counsel's opinion was that this was
Page 28 and 29:
Senator HUDDLESTON. But if it were
Page 30 and 31:
these were going on, especially whe
Page 32 and 33:
Only a handful of cases in which sc
Page 34 and 35:
29another threatened to kill on sig
Page 36 and 37:
Rarely has a drug interrogation inv
Page 38 and 39:
33REFERENCES1. Adams, E. Barbiturat
Page 40 and 41:
of Central Intelligence, subproject
Page 42 and 43:
for his own particular reasons not
Page 44 and 45:
projects will be completely deniabl
Page 46 and 47:
with that, but apparently for at le
Page 48 and 49:
Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there
Page 50 and 51:
Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about
Page 52 and 53:
who, if either of us, should get in
Page 54 and 55:
and the new documentation and the n
Page 56 and 57:
Senator INoUYE. And Mr. John Gittin
Page 58 and 59:
of those programs and your name is
Page 60 and 61:
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.Senator KENNEDY. W
Page 62 and 63:
And among other things, we decided
Page 64 and 65:
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we're not in
Page 66 and 67:
Senator KENNEDY. All right. I want
Page 68 and 69:
Senator SCHWEIKER. That is all I ha
Page 70 and 71:
386ties would have serious repercus
Page 72 and 73:
388that no damage was done to indiv
Page 74 and 75: 390funding mechanism for highly sen
Page 76 and 77: 72392subjects-the CIA had developed
Page 78 and 79: 394Although the CIA recognized thes
Page 80 and 81: 396proval of his immediate supervis
Page 82 and 83: 398Immediately after finding that O
Page 84 and 85: 400"observe the behavior of unwitti
Page 86 and 87: 402If one grants the validity of th
Page 88 and 89: 84404well, so that anybody who assi
Page 90 and 91: 86406result was that the Agency had
Page 92 and 93: 88- 408In 1963, the Inspector Gener
Page 94 and 95: 90410QKHILLTOP, another group desig
Page 96 and 97: 4121. Scope of TestingBetween 1955
Page 98 and 99: 414general lack of interagency comm
Page 100 and 101: 416For the next 28 minutes, the sub
Page 102 and 103: 418This problem was compounded by t
Page 104 and 105: 420The subsequent adoption of this
Page 106 and 107: 422apparent unwillingness on the pa
Page 108 and 109: 104u E T: Request for Guidance on H
Page 110 and 111: The Didctor of Central Intelligence
Page 112 and 113: 109APPENDIX CDOCUMENTS REFERRING TO
Page 114 and 115: 111PROPOSAL.Objective:To study the
Page 116 and 117: 113date -J.UN -In' 3.2 Lugo"tJ,55MI
Page 118 and 119: 115r urel avesaio'hi n tvopezied--
Page 120 and 121: 117The present ± vdstigation is co
Page 122 and 123: 11925 AuguSt 1955MERANDUM FOR:SUBJE
Page 126 and 127: 1235 May 1955A "-ticn of the 1Rosec
Page 128 and 129: 125The propozed facilityoj2S~ffara
Page 130 and 131: ads for tihs purpose through the co
Page 132 and 133: 663, dated 26 August 1954, funds ar
Page 134 and 135: 131.VI.Comments by the Office of Ge
Page 136 and 137: 133Ll-rezlh l-te fle on*~tA Subproj
Page 138 and 139: 135II.Background of theTh was incor
Page 140 and 141: 137VI.Difficulties Faced by TSS.It
Page 142 and 143: 139morale booster.(e)Human patients
Page 144 and 145: 141XI.Resultant Financial Saving.Th
Page 146 and 147: 143length about his -- "pcrimear.*
Page 148 and 149: Mr.Page Twodelay this matter for a
Page 150 and 151: 147rubjects varies from t::.0-ty' '
Page 152 and 153: 149tetrhr;eocrnnabbol nctata Ceriva
Page 154 and 155: 151DRAPT/a"o30 January 1961V2240RAN
Page 156 and 157: 153EMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT:
Page 158 and 159: 1551MMAManuman re' rsCOR-sUM FORt.
Page 160 and 161: 1571960The researci to be undertake
Page 162 and 163: 159.MEMORANDUM FOR: THtfEconnSUBJEC
Page 164 and 165: 161MMORANDM FOR: TE MODSUBJECTConti
Page 166 and 167: 163MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD o LtSU
Page 168 and 169: 165SUBJECT:Request for Support of R
Page 170 and 171: 1671.1 Trotter. W. defies brain con
Page 172 and 173: MATERIAL FOR THE RECORDMKSEARCH. OF
Page 174:
171QKHILLTOP DEFINITIONQKHILLTOP wa
show all

hearing

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?