for his own particular reasons not to have it public, I don't see whythose in a lesser echelon or lower echelon who have been effectively usedby it should not have the information as well.So, I would hopethat you would notify the universities and thenalso indicate to the public. I can't conceive that this information willnot be put out in the newspapers, and it puts the university people atan extraordinary disadvantage, and of course some of it is wrong,which is the fact of the matter, and I think some university officialsaying, well, it isn't so, is a lot different than if they know it is confirmedor it is not confirmed in terms of the Agency itself. I think thatthere is a responsibility there.Admiral TURNER. I have great sympathy with what you are saying.I have already notified one institution because the involvement was soextensive that I thought they really needed to protect themselves, andI am most anxious to do this in whatever way will help all of thepeople who were perhaps unwitting participants in this, and the difficultyI will have is, I can't quite do, I think, what you suggested, inthat I may not be able to tell an institution of the extent and nature ofits participation.Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can tell them to the best of your information,and it seems to me that just because the university or anindividual is going to be embarrassed is not a reason for classifyingthe information. So, I would hope-I mean, I obviously speak as anindividual Senator, but I feel that that is an incredible disservice tothe innocent individuals and, I think, a disservice to the integrity ofthe universities unless they are notified, to be able to develop proceduresyou are developing with regards to your own institution andwe are trying to in terms of the Congress. Certainly the universitiesare entitled to the same.Admiral TURNER. Yes. Not all of these, of course, were unwitting.Senator KENNEDY. That's right.Admiral TURNER. Many of them were witting, and therefore theycan take all those precautionary steps on their own, but I am perfectlyopen to doing this. I am only interested in doing it in a way that whenidentifying a university it will not lead to the public disclosure of theindividuals, whom I am not allowed to disclose, and so on.Senator KENNEDY. That could be done, it seems to me.Admiral TURNER. So, we will see if we can devise a way of notifyingthese institutions on a private basis so that they can then make theirown decision whether their equities are best served by their announcingit publicly or their attempting to maintain it-Senator KENNEDY. Or you. I wonder. What if they were to ask youto announce or indicate ?Admiral TURNER. My personal conscience, sir, at this time, is that Iwould be doing a disserve to these universities if I notified the public.Senator KENNEDY. Would you meet with some university officialsand ask what their views are or whether they feel that the preservationof the integrity of the universities would be better served or not?I think that would be useful to find out from small, large, private, andpublic universities' officials how they view the integrityAdmiral TURNER. Fine. I will phone several university presidentstoday who are my friends and who are not involved in this, and askthem what they think the equities would be.
Senator KENNEDY. All right. You let us know, too.Admiral TURNER. But I am not sure that I see that there is any greatbenefit in my notifying the public as opposed to the university notifyingthem. Let him have his choice whether he wants-each institutionwants to have it made public.Senator KENNEDY. Yes. The fact would remain that the institution'scredibility would be better served if the institution's president were todeny it and the university indicated that it did not participate in thatprogram than if the university were to deny it and the Agency saysnothing. It seems to me that that would be the strongest, and the onlyway that that is going to be credible. I would value it if you would getsome input from universities as to what they believe is the fairest wayin terms of the preservation of the integrity of the universities.Let me, if I could, ask on the question of the uses of these safehouses, as I understand from information that was provided to us inthe course of our last committee, the testing of various drugs on individualshappened at all social levels, high and low, it happened onnative Americans and also on foreign nationals. That is what I understandwas the nature of the project itself.Now, I am just wondering whether those tests were conducted at thetwo locations on the east coast and the west coast which were knownas safe houses. To your knowledge, is that correct?Admiral TURNER. Yes.Senator KENNEDY. In terms of the research in this particular program,it did not go beyond the safe houses located on the east coast andthe west coast? I believe I am correct on that.Admiral TURNER. That type of unwitting testing of sort of randomlyselected individuals, yes.Senator KENNEDY. It was just located in those two places?Admiral TURNER. To the best of our knowledge, there were only twolocations.Senator KENNEDY. Well, how do we interpret randomly selected?Admiral TURNER. Well, as opposed to prisoners in a prison who weresomehow selected.Senator KENNEDY. All right. Do you know from this informationhow many people were recruited during this period?Admiral TURNER. No idea.Senator KENNEDY. Do you know approximately?Admiral TURNER. I asked that question the other day, and we justdon't have-apparently we are very-well, either there were norecords kept of the actual numbers and types of people tested or theywere destroyed.Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.Senator SCmWEKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.Admiral Turner, I would like to come back to the experimentswhich may have been conducted at the hospital research facilitieswhich the CIA helped to finance. It wasn't clear to me from your previousanswers what kind of work was done there. I gather you are unclearon that, too, from your remarks, yet I find in the CIA documentationwhich you have supplied us, a list describing some of theadvantages the Agency hoped to gain. It says:(a) One-sixth of the total space in the new hospital wing will be available to theChemical Division of TSS * * * ; (b) Agency sponsorship of sensitive research
- Page 2: PROJECT MKIULTRA, THE CIA'S PROGRAM
- Page 5: CONTESTSStatements of:PageAdmiral S
- Page 10 and 11: destruction of MKULTRA files in 197
- Page 12 and 13: and harassment substances (pp. 4, 1
- Page 14 and 15: The material in 1975 was also spars
- Page 16 and 17: Tenth, there are six subprojects on
- Page 18 and 19: or damage to their reputations whic
- Page 20 and 21: In early June, however, he discover
- Page 22 and 23: 17You know, much of the research wh
- Page 24 and 25: efore, and I am hopeful we can get
- Page 26 and 27: Counsel's opinion was that this was
- Page 28 and 29: Senator HUDDLESTON. But if it were
- Page 30 and 31: these were going on, especially whe
- Page 32 and 33: Only a handful of cases in which sc
- Page 34 and 35: 29another threatened to kill on sig
- Page 36 and 37: Rarely has a drug interrogation inv
- Page 38 and 39: 33REFERENCES1. Adams, E. Barbiturat
- Page 40 and 41: of Central Intelligence, subproject
- Page 44 and 45: projects will be completely deniabl
- Page 46 and 47: with that, but apparently for at le
- Page 48 and 49: Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there
- Page 50 and 51: Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about
- Page 52 and 53: who, if either of us, should get in
- Page 54 and 55: and the new documentation and the n
- Page 56 and 57: Senator INoUYE. And Mr. John Gittin
- Page 58 and 59: of those programs and your name is
- Page 60 and 61: Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.Senator KENNEDY. W
- Page 62 and 63: And among other things, we decided
- Page 64 and 65: Senator KENNEDY. Well, we're not in
- Page 66 and 67: Senator KENNEDY. All right. I want
- Page 68 and 69: Senator SCHWEIKER. That is all I ha
- Page 70 and 71: 386ties would have serious repercus
- Page 72 and 73: 388that no damage was done to indiv
- Page 74 and 75: 390funding mechanism for highly sen
- Page 76 and 77: 72392subjects-the CIA had developed
- Page 78 and 79: 394Although the CIA recognized thes
- Page 80 and 81: 396proval of his immediate supervis
- Page 82 and 83: 398Immediately after finding that O
- Page 84 and 85: 400"observe the behavior of unwitti
- Page 86 and 87: 402If one grants the validity of th
- Page 88 and 89: 84404well, so that anybody who assi
- Page 90 and 91: 86406result was that the Agency had
- Page 92 and 93:
88- 408In 1963, the Inspector Gener
- Page 94 and 95:
90410QKHILLTOP, another group desig
- Page 96 and 97:
4121. Scope of TestingBetween 1955
- Page 98 and 99:
414general lack of interagency comm
- Page 100 and 101:
416For the next 28 minutes, the sub
- Page 102 and 103:
418This problem was compounded by t
- Page 104 and 105:
420The subsequent adoption of this
- Page 106 and 107:
422apparent unwillingness on the pa
- Page 108 and 109:
104u E T: Request for Guidance on H
- Page 110 and 111:
The Didctor of Central Intelligence
- Page 112 and 113:
109APPENDIX CDOCUMENTS REFERRING TO
- Page 114 and 115:
111PROPOSAL.Objective:To study the
- Page 116 and 117:
113date -J.UN -In' 3.2 Lugo"tJ,55MI
- Page 118 and 119:
115r urel avesaio'hi n tvopezied--
- Page 120 and 121:
117The present ± vdstigation is co
- Page 122 and 123:
11925 AuguSt 1955MERANDUM FOR:SUBJE
- Page 124 and 125:
121cherce c ontir.. the ro,:ect. if
- Page 126 and 127:
1235 May 1955A "-ticn of the 1Rosec
- Page 128 and 129:
125The propozed facilityoj2S~ffara
- Page 130 and 131:
ads for tihs purpose through the co
- Page 132 and 133:
663, dated 26 August 1954, funds ar
- Page 134 and 135:
131.VI.Comments by the Office of Ge
- Page 136 and 137:
133Ll-rezlh l-te fle on*~tA Subproj
- Page 138 and 139:
135II.Background of theTh was incor
- Page 140 and 141:
137VI.Difficulties Faced by TSS.It
- Page 142 and 143:
139morale booster.(e)Human patients
- Page 144 and 145:
141XI.Resultant Financial Saving.Th
- Page 146 and 147:
143length about his -- "pcrimear.*
- Page 148 and 149:
Mr.Page Twodelay this matter for a
- Page 150 and 151:
147rubjects varies from t::.0-ty' '
- Page 152 and 153:
149tetrhr;eocrnnabbol nctata Ceriva
- Page 154 and 155:
151DRAPT/a"o30 January 1961V2240RAN
- Page 156 and 157:
153EMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT:
- Page 158 and 159:
1551MMAManuman re' rsCOR-sUM FORt.
- Page 160 and 161:
1571960The researci to be undertake
- Page 162 and 163:
159.MEMORANDUM FOR: THtfEconnSUBJEC
- Page 164 and 165:
161MMORANDM FOR: TE MODSUBJECTConti
- Page 166 and 167:
163MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD o LtSU
- Page 168 and 169:
165SUBJECT:Request for Support of R
- Page 170 and 171:
1671.1 Trotter. W. defies brain con
- Page 172 and 173:
MATERIAL FOR THE RECORDMKSEARCH. OF
- Page 174:
171QKHILLTOP DEFINITIONQKHILLTOP wa