with that, but apparently for at least a year or two, somebody wasinvestigating the production of brain concussions with special blackjacks,sound waves, and other methods as detailed in the backupmaterial.Admiral TURNER. The data available to me is that this project wasnever funded by the CIA, but I will d)uble-check that and furnish theinformation for the record for you as to whether there was ever anyconnection here and if so, what the nature of the work was.[The material referred to follows:]Mr. Laubinger corrected his testimony regarding Subproject 54 during theSeptember 21, 1977 <strong>hearing</strong>s before the Subcommittee on Health and ScientificResearch of the Human Resources Committee. The relevant portion is reproducedbelow:Mr. LAIBINGER. On project 54, it has got a rather sensational proposal in there,in terms of the.work that they propose to do, and you asked about the proposaland I said, in fact, it was never funded under MKULTRA. Now, I overlooked--atleast, my memory did not serve me correctly when I went through that file folderto see one memorandum dated January 10, 1956, which makes it quite clear, as amatter of fact, that that proposal was based on prior work that was funded bythe Agency.Senator ScnwnxKER. By what?Mr. LAUBINGER. By the CIA. So, that information was in their file folder. Itdid not happen to be in my head when I testified.Senator SCHWEIKER. I think I might have read you that, and that is why Iargued at the time with you, because I think I had in front of me, as I recall,some indication that it was funded there. I did read that to you. So, you didsupply it to us; there is no argument about that information.Mr. LAUBINGER. Perhaps I am sort of headstrong, myself, and in my own view,I am reading under the ULTRA project, that if it had been funded underULTRA, it would have had a project number and identified as such. The thingthat threw me was that it was funded, apparently, outside of any MKULTRAactivity and it was under the normal contracting process, so that it was notincluded in MKULTRA as 'any work done under that funding umbrella.The file folder that you have and I have, right here, makes it quite clear,however, that a year's work was done through navy funding-a navy fundingmechanism-on which the proposal was based that ultimately came into theMKULTRA program. That second proposal was never funded. So, there wasconflict and I, personally, I think, introduced a little bit of confusion in that inmy testimony.Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, do you agree or not agree with DOD's statementhere that even though the initial funding was navy, it was really a conduit forthe CIA?Mr. LAUBINGER. I think that is correct.Senator SCHWEIKER. Yes; I would appreciate that. I would like toknow how it went from ONR to CIA after a year. Somebody made adecision to make that transfer, and to make this an MKULTRA subject.There had to be some sort of review that led to a decision tocontinue that kind of concussion-total blackout, maximum amnesia,and whatever else it was you were interested in-study and testing.Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, if I may try to say a few words on that,the files that were available to us for inspection, which are limited,indicated that there was a project being carried on by the Navy havingto do with the effects of brain concussion. The CIA developed an interestin that, and considered funding it, but actually never did, and asthe admiral testified, the MKULTRA is merely a funding mechanism,a place they go for money to do such things, but there is no evidencethat I know of that that project was ever funded.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I am confused, because here again is anotherquote from a document that we have seen, which you have releasedand supplied to us:Following is the technical progress made under the current [deleted] contract:(a) Specialized instrumentation and numerous testing techniques have beendeveloped to obtain the desired dynamic data; (b) considerable data has nowbeen obtained supporting the resonance-cav~ilation theory of brain concussion; and(c) preliminary accelerationi threshold data has been obtained for a fluid-filledglass simulated skull.It goes on to talk about a blast range and a 2 , 5 0 0 -square-foot laboratory.The document notes that "Three blast test series have been runto date." It describes a special blackjack device, "a pancake-type blackjackgiving a high peak impact force with a low unit surface pressure."I agree the records are inconclusive as to the results of this work,but it certainly seems that some testing was done.Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, you are putting us in the same positionI think you were stating that you were in earlier in referring to docunmentsnot before us, but I believe you are quoting from a proposaLthat someone sent to the Agency to fund this work, and he is referringto past work. The past work would have encompassed a lot of thingslike that, but CIA was not involved with that.Senator SCHWETKER. What do you mean, Admiral, on page 6 of yourtestimony when you mention projects using magician's art? How domagicians get into the spook business?Admiral TURNER. I have interpreted this as to how to slip the mickeyinto the finn, but I would like to ask my advisers here to comment.Mr. Bory. I think that is essentially it, Senator. It is surreptitiousadministration of material to someone, deceptive practices, how todistract someone's attention while you are doing something else, asI understand it. It was also some type of a covert communicationproject involved with the study of how magicians and their assistantsperhaps communicate mformation to one another without having otherpeople know it. This is the type of thing that was involved, sir.Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.Senator INoUYE. Senator Huddleston?Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.Admiral, in your checking these newly discovered documents andinterviewing members of the CIA staff, did you find information thatwould confirm the contention described by the reporters for the NewYork Times that this type of experimentation was begun out of afear at the Agency that foreign powers might have had drugs whichwould allow them to alter the behavior of American citizens or agentsor members of the Armed Forces who were taken into custody, andwhich would have resulted in false confessions and the like? Is myquestion clear?Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. I haven't personally read the documentationon that. In my discussions with the people who are well informedin this area at the Agency, I am told that that is the case.Senator HUDDLESTON. Was there any evidence or any indication thatthere were other motives that the Agency might also be looking for(1-ugs that could be applied for other purposes, such as debilitating anindividual or even killing another person? Was this part of this kindof experimentation?
- Page 2: PROJECT MKIULTRA, THE CIA'S PROGRAM
- Page 5: CONTESTSStatements of:PageAdmiral S
- Page 10 and 11: destruction of MKULTRA files in 197
- Page 12 and 13: and harassment substances (pp. 4, 1
- Page 14 and 15: The material in 1975 was also spars
- Page 16 and 17: Tenth, there are six subprojects on
- Page 18 and 19: or damage to their reputations whic
- Page 20 and 21: In early June, however, he discover
- Page 22 and 23: 17You know, much of the research wh
- Page 24 and 25: efore, and I am hopeful we can get
- Page 26 and 27: Counsel's opinion was that this was
- Page 28 and 29: Senator HUDDLESTON. But if it were
- Page 30 and 31: these were going on, especially whe
- Page 32 and 33: Only a handful of cases in which sc
- Page 34 and 35: 29another threatened to kill on sig
- Page 36 and 37: Rarely has a drug interrogation inv
- Page 38 and 39: 33REFERENCES1. Adams, E. Barbiturat
- Page 40 and 41: of Central Intelligence, subproject
- Page 42 and 43: for his own particular reasons not
- Page 44 and 45: projects will be completely deniabl
- Page 48 and 49: Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there
- Page 50 and 51: Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about
- Page 52 and 53: who, if either of us, should get in
- Page 54 and 55: and the new documentation and the n
- Page 56 and 57: Senator INoUYE. And Mr. John Gittin
- Page 58 and 59: of those programs and your name is
- Page 60 and 61: Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.Senator KENNEDY. W
- Page 62 and 63: And among other things, we decided
- Page 64 and 65: Senator KENNEDY. Well, we're not in
- Page 66 and 67: Senator KENNEDY. All right. I want
- Page 68 and 69: Senator SCHWEIKER. That is all I ha
- Page 70 and 71: 386ties would have serious repercus
- Page 72 and 73: 388that no damage was done to indiv
- Page 74 and 75: 390funding mechanism for highly sen
- Page 76 and 77: 72392subjects-the CIA had developed
- Page 78 and 79: 394Although the CIA recognized thes
- Page 80 and 81: 396proval of his immediate supervis
- Page 82 and 83: 398Immediately after finding that O
- Page 84 and 85: 400"observe the behavior of unwitti
- Page 86 and 87: 402If one grants the validity of th
- Page 88 and 89: 84404well, so that anybody who assi
- Page 90 and 91: 86406result was that the Agency had
- Page 92 and 93: 88- 408In 1963, the Inspector Gener
- Page 94 and 95: 90410QKHILLTOP, another group desig
- Page 96 and 97:
4121. Scope of TestingBetween 1955
- Page 98 and 99:
414general lack of interagency comm
- Page 100 and 101:
416For the next 28 minutes, the sub
- Page 102 and 103:
418This problem was compounded by t
- Page 104 and 105:
420The subsequent adoption of this
- Page 106 and 107:
422apparent unwillingness on the pa
- Page 108 and 109:
104u E T: Request for Guidance on H
- Page 110 and 111:
The Didctor of Central Intelligence
- Page 112 and 113:
109APPENDIX CDOCUMENTS REFERRING TO
- Page 114 and 115:
111PROPOSAL.Objective:To study the
- Page 116 and 117:
113date -J.UN -In' 3.2 Lugo"tJ,55MI
- Page 118 and 119:
115r urel avesaio'hi n tvopezied--
- Page 120 and 121:
117The present ± vdstigation is co
- Page 122 and 123:
11925 AuguSt 1955MERANDUM FOR:SUBJE
- Page 124 and 125:
121cherce c ontir.. the ro,:ect. if
- Page 126 and 127:
1235 May 1955A "-ticn of the 1Rosec
- Page 128 and 129:
125The propozed facilityoj2S~ffara
- Page 130 and 131:
ads for tihs purpose through the co
- Page 132 and 133:
663, dated 26 August 1954, funds ar
- Page 134 and 135:
131.VI.Comments by the Office of Ge
- Page 136 and 137:
133Ll-rezlh l-te fle on*~tA Subproj
- Page 138 and 139:
135II.Background of theTh was incor
- Page 140 and 141:
137VI.Difficulties Faced by TSS.It
- Page 142 and 143:
139morale booster.(e)Human patients
- Page 144 and 145:
141XI.Resultant Financial Saving.Th
- Page 146 and 147:
143length about his -- "pcrimear.*
- Page 148 and 149:
Mr.Page Twodelay this matter for a
- Page 150 and 151:
147rubjects varies from t::.0-ty' '
- Page 152 and 153:
149tetrhr;eocrnnabbol nctata Ceriva
- Page 154 and 155:
151DRAPT/a"o30 January 1961V2240RAN
- Page 156 and 157:
153EMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT:
- Page 158 and 159:
1551MMAManuman re' rsCOR-sUM FORt.
- Page 160 and 161:
1571960The researci to be undertake
- Page 162 and 163:
159.MEMORANDUM FOR: THtfEconnSUBJEC
- Page 164 and 165:
161MMORANDM FOR: TE MODSUBJECTConti
- Page 166 and 167:
163MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD o LtSU
- Page 168 and 169:
165SUBJECT:Request for Support of R
- Page 170 and 171:
1671.1 Trotter. W. defies brain con
- Page 172 and 173:
MATERIAL FOR THE RECORDMKSEARCH. OF
- Page 174:
171QKHILLTOP DEFINITIONQKHILLTOP wa