of Central Intelligence, subproject 3 was not terminated immediatelyafter Dr. Olson's death.In fact. according to documents, it continued for a number of years.Can you provide this committee with any explanation of how suchtesting could have continued under these circumstances?Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I really can't.Senator INOUYE. Are the individuals in the technical services whocarried on subproject 3 still on the CIA payroll?Admiral TURNER. I am sorry. Are you asking, are they today?Senator INOUYE. Yes.Admiral TURNER. No, sir.Senator INOUYE. What would you do if you criticized officials of thetechnical services staff and they continued to carry on experimentationfor a number of years?Admiral TURNER. I would do two things, sir. One is, I would be sureat the beginning that I was explicit enough that they knew that Ididn't want that to be continued anywhere else, and two, if I found itbeing continued, I would roll some heads.Senator INOUYE. Could you provide this committee with informationas to whether the individuals involved had their heads rolled?Admiral TURNER. I don't believe there is any evidence they did, butI will double check that.[See p. 170 for material referred to.]Senator INOUYE. As you know, Senator Huddleston and his subcommitteeare deeply involved in the drafting of charters and guidelinesfor the intelligence community. We will be meeting with the Presidenttomorrow. Our concern is, I think, a basic one. Can anything like thisoccur again?Admiral TURNER. I think it would be very, very unlikely, first, becausewe are all much more conscious of these issues than we were backin the fifties, second, because we have such thorough oversight procedures.I cannot imagine that this kind of activity could take placetoday without some member of the CIA itself bypassing me, if I wereauthorizing this, and writing to the Intelligence Oversight Board, andblowing the whistle on this kind of activity.I am also doing my very best, sir, to encourage an openness withmyself and a free communication in the Agency, so that I am the onewho finds these things if they should happen. The fact is that we mustkeep you and your committee and now the new committee in the Houseinformed of our sensitive activities. I think all of these add up to adegree of scrutiny such that this kind of extensive and flagrant activitycould not happen today without it coming to the attention of the properauthorities to stop it.Senator INOUYE. A sad aspect of the MKULTRA project was thatit naturally involved the people who unwittingly or wittingly got involvedin experimentation. I would appreciate it if you would reportback to this committee in 3 months on what the Agency has done tonotify these individuals and these institutions, and furthermore, tonotify us as to what steps have been taken to identify victims, and ifidentified, what you have done to assist them, monetarily or otherwise.Admiral TURNER. All right, sir. I will be happy to.Senator GOLDWATER. Will the Senator yield?
Senator INoUYE. Yes, Sir.Senator GOLDWATER. I wonder if he could include in that report forour information only a complete listing of the individuals and theexperiments done on them, and whether they were'witting or unwitting,volunteer or nonvolunteer, and what has been the result in each case.I think that would be interesting.Admiral TURNER. Fine. Yes, Sir.Senator INOUYE. Senator Kennedy?Senator KENNEDY. Thank you. It is your intention to notify the individualswho have been the subjects of the research, is that right,Admiral Turner? Do you intend to notify those individuals?Admiral TURNER. Yes.Senator KENNEDY. If you can identify them, you intend to notifythem?Admiral TURNER. Yes.Senator KENNEDY. And you intend to notify the universities or researchcenters as well?Admiral TURNER. Senator, I am torn on that. I understand youropening statement. I put myself in the position of the president of oneof those universities, let's say. If he were witting-if his universityhad been witting of this activity with us, he has access to all that informationtoday. If he were not witting, I wonder if the process ofinforming him might put his institution's reputation in more jeopardythan letting them go on the way they are today, not knowing. I reallydon't know the equities here.Senator KENNEDY. Well, the problem is, all you have to do is pick upthe newspapers and you see these universities mentioned. In many instances,I think you are putting the university people at an extraordinarydisadvantage, where there is a complete change of administration,and they may for one reason or another not have informationthat they are under suspicion. There is innuendo; there is rumor. Icannot help but believe that it will just get smeared all over the newspapersin spite of all the security steps that have been taken.It seems to me that those universities should be entitled to that information,so that the ones with other administrations can adapt proceduresto protect those universities. The importance of preserving theindependence of our research areas and the communities seems to me tobe a very fundamental kind of question about the protection of theintegrity of our universities and our research centers.Admiral TURNER. You are saying that you feel that if we identifythem privately to themselves, we can benefit them in an adequate way tocover the risk that this will lead to a more public disclosure? There arelots of the 80 who have not been identified publicly at this point.Senator KENNEDY. I think the universities themselves should be notified.I think then the universities can take whatever steps in terms oftheir setting up the procedures to protect their own kinds of integrityin terms of the future. I would certainly hope that they would feelthat they could make a public comment or a public statement on it.I think it is of general public interest, particularly for the people thatare involved in those universities, to have some kind of awareness ofwhether they were used or were not used and how they were used.I think they are entitled to it, and quite frankly, if there is a publicofficial or an official of the university that you notify and he wants
- Page 2: PROJECT MKIULTRA, THE CIA'S PROGRAM
- Page 5: CONTESTSStatements of:PageAdmiral S
- Page 10 and 11: destruction of MKULTRA files in 197
- Page 12 and 13: and harassment substances (pp. 4, 1
- Page 14 and 15: The material in 1975 was also spars
- Page 16 and 17: Tenth, there are six subprojects on
- Page 18 and 19: or damage to their reputations whic
- Page 20 and 21: In early June, however, he discover
- Page 22 and 23: 17You know, much of the research wh
- Page 24 and 25: efore, and I am hopeful we can get
- Page 26 and 27: Counsel's opinion was that this was
- Page 28 and 29: Senator HUDDLESTON. But if it were
- Page 30 and 31: these were going on, especially whe
- Page 32 and 33: Only a handful of cases in which sc
- Page 34 and 35: 29another threatened to kill on sig
- Page 36 and 37: Rarely has a drug interrogation inv
- Page 38 and 39: 33REFERENCES1. Adams, E. Barbiturat
- Page 42 and 43: for his own particular reasons not
- Page 44 and 45: projects will be completely deniabl
- Page 46 and 47: with that, but apparently for at le
- Page 48 and 49: Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there
- Page 50 and 51: Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about
- Page 52 and 53: who, if either of us, should get in
- Page 54 and 55: and the new documentation and the n
- Page 56 and 57: Senator INoUYE. And Mr. John Gittin
- Page 58 and 59: of those programs and your name is
- Page 60 and 61: Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.Senator KENNEDY. W
- Page 62 and 63: And among other things, we decided
- Page 64 and 65: Senator KENNEDY. Well, we're not in
- Page 66 and 67: Senator KENNEDY. All right. I want
- Page 68 and 69: Senator SCHWEIKER. That is all I ha
- Page 70 and 71: 386ties would have serious repercus
- Page 72 and 73: 388that no damage was done to indiv
- Page 74 and 75: 390funding mechanism for highly sen
- Page 76 and 77: 72392subjects-the CIA had developed
- Page 78 and 79: 394Although the CIA recognized thes
- Page 80 and 81: 396proval of his immediate supervis
- Page 82 and 83: 398Immediately after finding that O
- Page 84 and 85: 400"observe the behavior of unwitti
- Page 86 and 87: 402If one grants the validity of th
- Page 88 and 89: 84404well, so that anybody who assi
- Page 90 and 91:
86406result was that the Agency had
- Page 92 and 93:
88- 408In 1963, the Inspector Gener
- Page 94 and 95:
90410QKHILLTOP, another group desig
- Page 96 and 97:
4121. Scope of TestingBetween 1955
- Page 98 and 99:
414general lack of interagency comm
- Page 100 and 101:
416For the next 28 minutes, the sub
- Page 102 and 103:
418This problem was compounded by t
- Page 104 and 105:
420The subsequent adoption of this
- Page 106 and 107:
422apparent unwillingness on the pa
- Page 108 and 109:
104u E T: Request for Guidance on H
- Page 110 and 111:
The Didctor of Central Intelligence
- Page 112 and 113:
109APPENDIX CDOCUMENTS REFERRING TO
- Page 114 and 115:
111PROPOSAL.Objective:To study the
- Page 116 and 117:
113date -J.UN -In' 3.2 Lugo"tJ,55MI
- Page 118 and 119:
115r urel avesaio'hi n tvopezied--
- Page 120 and 121:
117The present ± vdstigation is co
- Page 122 and 123:
11925 AuguSt 1955MERANDUM FOR:SUBJE
- Page 124 and 125:
121cherce c ontir.. the ro,:ect. if
- Page 126 and 127:
1235 May 1955A "-ticn of the 1Rosec
- Page 128 and 129:
125The propozed facilityoj2S~ffara
- Page 130 and 131:
ads for tihs purpose through the co
- Page 132 and 133:
663, dated 26 August 1954, funds ar
- Page 134 and 135:
131.VI.Comments by the Office of Ge
- Page 136 and 137:
133Ll-rezlh l-te fle on*~tA Subproj
- Page 138 and 139:
135II.Background of theTh was incor
- Page 140 and 141:
137VI.Difficulties Faced by TSS.It
- Page 142 and 143:
139morale booster.(e)Human patients
- Page 144 and 145:
141XI.Resultant Financial Saving.Th
- Page 146 and 147:
143length about his -- "pcrimear.*
- Page 148 and 149:
Mr.Page Twodelay this matter for a
- Page 150 and 151:
147rubjects varies from t::.0-ty' '
- Page 152 and 153:
149tetrhr;eocrnnabbol nctata Ceriva
- Page 154 and 155:
151DRAPT/a"o30 January 1961V2240RAN
- Page 156 and 157:
153EMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT:
- Page 158 and 159:
1551MMAManuman re' rsCOR-sUM FORt.
- Page 160 and 161:
1571960The researci to be undertake
- Page 162 and 163:
159.MEMORANDUM FOR: THtfEconnSUBJEC
- Page 164 and 165:
161MMORANDM FOR: TE MODSUBJECTConti
- Page 166 and 167:
163MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD o LtSU
- Page 168 and 169:
165SUBJECT:Request for Support of R
- Page 170 and 171:
1671.1 Trotter. W. defies brain con
- Page 172 and 173:
MATERIAL FOR THE RECORDMKSEARCH. OF
- Page 174:
171QKHILLTOP DEFINITIONQKHILLTOP wa