386ties would have serious repercussions in political and diplomatic circlesand would be detrimental to the accomplishment of its missions." 3The research and development program, and particularly the coverttesting programs, resulted in massive abridgments of the rightsof American citizens, sometimes with tra'gic consequences. The deathsof two Americans 3a can be attributed to these programs; other participantsin the testing programs may still suffer from the residual effects.While some controlled testing of these substances might be defended,the nature of the tests, their scale, and the fact that they werecontinued for years after the danger of surreptitious administrationof LSD to unwitting individuals was known, demonstrate a fundamentaldisregard for the value of human life.The Select Committee's investigation of the testing and use of chemicaland biological agents also raise serious questions about the adequacyof command and control procedures within the Central IntelligenceAgency and military intelligence, and about the relationshipsamong the intelligence agencies, other governmental agencies, andprivate institutions and individuals. The CIA's normal administrativecontrols were waived for programs involving chemical and biologicalagents to protect. their security. According to the head of the AuditBranch O-f the CIA. these waivers produced "gross administrativefailures." They prevgnted the CIA's internal review mechanisms (theOffice of General Counsel, the Inspector General, and the Audit Staff)from adequately supervising the programs. In general, the waivers hadthe paradoxical effect of providing less restrictive administrative controlsand less effective internal review for controversial and highlysensitive projects than those governing normal Agency activities.The security of the programs was protected not only by waiversof normal administrative controls, but also by a high degree of compartmentationwithin the CIA. This compartmentation excluded theCIA's Medical Staff from the principal research and testing programemploying chemical and biological agents.It also may have led to agency policymakers receiving differingand inconsistent responses when they posed questions to the CIAcomponent involved.Jurisdictional uncertainty within the CIA was matched by jurisdictionalconflict among the various intelligence agencies. A spirit ofcooperation and reciprocal exchanges of information which initiallycharacterized the programs disappeared. Military testers withheld inlormationfrom the CIA, ignoring suggestions for coordination fromtheir superiors. The CIA similarly failed to provide informiation tothe military on the CIA's testing program. This failure to cooperatewas conspicuously manifested in an attempt by the Army to conceal3CIA Inspector General's Survey of TSD, 1957, p. 217." On January 8, 1953. Mr. Harold Blauer died of circulatory collapse and heartfailure following an intravenous injection of a synthetic mescaline derivativewhile a subject of tests conducted by New York State Psychiatric Institute undera contract let by the U.S. Army Chemical Corps. The Committee's investigationinto drug testing by U.S. intelligence agencies focused on the testing of LSD, however,the committee did receive a copy of the U.S. Army Inspector General'sReport, issued on October 1975, on the events and circumstances of Mr. Blauer'sdeath. His death was directly atributable to the administration of the syntheticmescaline derivative.
387their overseas testing program, which included surreptitious administrationof LSD, from the CIA. Learning of the Army's program,the Agency surreptitiously attempted to obtain details of it.The-decision to institute one of the Army's LSD field testing projectshad been based, at least in part, on the finding that no long-term residualeffects had ever resulted from the drug's administration. TheCIA's failure to inform the Army of a death which resulted from thesurreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting Americans, may wellhave resulted in the institution of an unnecessary and potentially lethalprogram.The development, testing, and use of chelnical and biological agentsby intelligence agencies raises serious questions about the relationshipbetween the intelligence community and foreign governments, otheragencies of the Federal Government, and other institutions and individuals.The questions raised range from the legitimacy of Americancomplicity in actions abroad which violate American and foreign lawsto the possible compromise of the integrity of public and private institutionsused as cover by intelligence agencies.A. THE PROGRAMS INVESTIGATED1. Project CHATTERProject CHATTER was a Navy program that began in the fall of1947. Responding to reports of "amazing results" achieved by theSoviets in using "truth drugs," the program focused on the identificationand testing of. such drugs for use in interrogations and in therecruitmenc of agents. The research included laboratory experimentson animals and hump , subjects involving Anabasis aphylla, scopolamine,and rhescaline in order to determine their speech-inducing qualities.Overseas experiments were conducted as part of the project.The project expanded substantially during the Korean War, andended shortly after the war, in 1953. .2. Project BLUEBIRD/ARTICHOKEThe'earliest of the CIA's major programs involving the use ofchemical and biological agents, Project BLUEBIRD, was approved bythe Director in 1950. Its objectives were:(a) discovering means of conditioning personnel to preventunauthorized extraction of information from them by knownmeans, (b) investigating the possibility of control of an individualby application of special interrogation techniques,(c) memory enhancement, and (d) establishing defensivemeans for preventing hostile control of Agency personnel.4As a result of interrogations conducted overseas during the project,another goal was added-the evaluation of offensive uses of unconvent:ionalinterrogation techniques, including hypnosis and drugs. In*August 1951, the project was renamed ARTICHOKE. Project ARTI-CHOKE included in-house experiments on interrogation techniques,conducted "under medical and security controls which would ensure'CIA memorandum to the Select Committee, "Behavioral Drugs and Testing,"2/11/75.
- Page 2:
PROJECT MKIULTRA, THE CIA'S PROGRAM
- Page 5:
CONTESTSStatements of:PageAdmiral S
- Page 10 and 11:
destruction of MKULTRA files in 197
- Page 12 and 13:
and harassment substances (pp. 4, 1
- Page 14 and 15:
The material in 1975 was also spars
- Page 16 and 17:
Tenth, there are six subprojects on
- Page 18 and 19:
or damage to their reputations whic
- Page 20 and 21: In early June, however, he discover
- Page 22 and 23: 17You know, much of the research wh
- Page 24 and 25: efore, and I am hopeful we can get
- Page 26 and 27: Counsel's opinion was that this was
- Page 28 and 29: Senator HUDDLESTON. But if it were
- Page 30 and 31: these were going on, especially whe
- Page 32 and 33: Only a handful of cases in which sc
- Page 34 and 35: 29another threatened to kill on sig
- Page 36 and 37: Rarely has a drug interrogation inv
- Page 38 and 39: 33REFERENCES1. Adams, E. Barbiturat
- Page 40 and 41: of Central Intelligence, subproject
- Page 42 and 43: for his own particular reasons not
- Page 44 and 45: projects will be completely deniabl
- Page 46 and 47: with that, but apparently for at le
- Page 48 and 49: Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there
- Page 50 and 51: Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about
- Page 52 and 53: who, if either of us, should get in
- Page 54 and 55: and the new documentation and the n
- Page 56 and 57: Senator INoUYE. And Mr. John Gittin
- Page 58 and 59: of those programs and your name is
- Page 60 and 61: Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.Senator KENNEDY. W
- Page 62 and 63: And among other things, we decided
- Page 64 and 65: Senator KENNEDY. Well, we're not in
- Page 66 and 67: Senator KENNEDY. All right. I want
- Page 68 and 69: Senator SCHWEIKER. That is all I ha
- Page 72 and 73: 388that no damage was done to indiv
- Page 74 and 75: 390funding mechanism for highly sen
- Page 76 and 77: 72392subjects-the CIA had developed
- Page 78 and 79: 394Although the CIA recognized thes
- Page 80 and 81: 396proval of his immediate supervis
- Page 82 and 83: 398Immediately after finding that O
- Page 84 and 85: 400"observe the behavior of unwitti
- Page 86 and 87: 402If one grants the validity of th
- Page 88 and 89: 84404well, so that anybody who assi
- Page 90 and 91: 86406result was that the Agency had
- Page 92 and 93: 88- 408In 1963, the Inspector Gener
- Page 94 and 95: 90410QKHILLTOP, another group desig
- Page 96 and 97: 4121. Scope of TestingBetween 1955
- Page 98 and 99: 414general lack of interagency comm
- Page 100 and 101: 416For the next 28 minutes, the sub
- Page 102 and 103: 418This problem was compounded by t
- Page 104 and 105: 420The subsequent adoption of this
- Page 106 and 107: 422apparent unwillingness on the pa
- Page 108 and 109: 104u E T: Request for Guidance on H
- Page 110 and 111: The Didctor of Central Intelligence
- Page 112 and 113: 109APPENDIX CDOCUMENTS REFERRING TO
- Page 114 and 115: 111PROPOSAL.Objective:To study the
- Page 116 and 117: 113date -J.UN -In' 3.2 Lugo"tJ,55MI
- Page 118 and 119: 115r urel avesaio'hi n tvopezied--
- Page 120 and 121:
117The present ± vdstigation is co
- Page 122 and 123:
11925 AuguSt 1955MERANDUM FOR:SUBJE
- Page 124 and 125:
121cherce c ontir.. the ro,:ect. if
- Page 126 and 127:
1235 May 1955A "-ticn of the 1Rosec
- Page 128 and 129:
125The propozed facilityoj2S~ffara
- Page 130 and 131:
ads for tihs purpose through the co
- Page 132 and 133:
663, dated 26 August 1954, funds ar
- Page 134 and 135:
131.VI.Comments by the Office of Ge
- Page 136 and 137:
133Ll-rezlh l-te fle on*~tA Subproj
- Page 138 and 139:
135II.Background of theTh was incor
- Page 140 and 141:
137VI.Difficulties Faced by TSS.It
- Page 142 and 143:
139morale booster.(e)Human patients
- Page 144 and 145:
141XI.Resultant Financial Saving.Th
- Page 146 and 147:
143length about his -- "pcrimear.*
- Page 148 and 149:
Mr.Page Twodelay this matter for a
- Page 150 and 151:
147rubjects varies from t::.0-ty' '
- Page 152 and 153:
149tetrhr;eocrnnabbol nctata Ceriva
- Page 154 and 155:
151DRAPT/a"o30 January 1961V2240RAN
- Page 156 and 157:
153EMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT:
- Page 158 and 159:
1551MMAManuman re' rsCOR-sUM FORt.
- Page 160 and 161:
1571960The researci to be undertake
- Page 162 and 163:
159.MEMORANDUM FOR: THtfEconnSUBJEC
- Page 164 and 165:
161MMORANDM FOR: TE MODSUBJECTConti
- Page 166 and 167:
163MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD o LtSU
- Page 168 and 169:
165SUBJECT:Request for Support of R
- Page 170 and 171:
1671.1 Trotter. W. defies brain con
- Page 172 and 173:
MATERIAL FOR THE RECORDMKSEARCH. OF
- Page 174:
171QKHILLTOP DEFINITIONQKHILLTOP wa