1-minutes-of-meeting-wef-28-1-2008-till-date - Asha on SCBA Multi ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Minutes <strong>of</strong> Emergent Meeting <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Directors <strong>of</strong> SupremeCourt Bar Association Multi State Cooperative Group Housing SocietyLtd. (Regd) held on Saturday the 26 th April <strong>2008</strong> at 4.45 P.M. inSupreme Court Bar Association’s Committee Room. The Agenda <strong>of</strong> the<strong>meeting</strong> was: -Item No. I To consider the Recommendation regarding appointment<strong>of</strong> Architect.Item No. II To discuss the High Court Case regarding consentedorder by both parties since the matter is fixed for hearing on29 th April <strong>2008</strong>.Item No. III Any other matter with the permission <strong>of</strong> the Chair.1. On 26/04/08 at 11.a.m., the Board <strong>of</strong> Directors held joint<strong>meeting</strong> with Pr<strong>of</strong>. Satish Khanna, Department <strong>of</strong> Architecture,School <strong>of</strong> Planning & Architecture, New Delhi., in the SupremeCourt Bar Association’s conference Room. In the said <strong>meeting</strong>,all the four Architects (as short-listed by the Board) i.e. Design‘A’, The Mars, Development Consultant & The Colleagues gavetheir presentation / demonstration regarding Noida Project.After the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the presentations (which continued from11a.m. to 4.30 p.m.), the above said expert submitted hisvaluable recommendations in his report after considering thesaid presentations / other Quires and the same was dulyreceived by the C.E.O. in the Society <strong>of</strong>fice on 26.04.08 at 5 P.M.The Meeting <strong>of</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Directors was adjourned for <strong>28</strong>.04.08. Itwas agreed that the said expert report will be considered in theBoards Meeting on Monday the <strong>28</strong> th April 08 at 4.30 P.M. and theBoard will decide the appointment <strong>of</strong> architect in the light <strong>of</strong> thesaid expert’s report. In this regard it was agreed that no furthernotice will be issued, and the Directors who were not available inthe Meeting shall be informed telephonically by the <strong>of</strong>fice todayitself.2. Since the applicant has not approached the Board, the mattercould not be discussed and no decision could be taken. Hencethis Agenda item is deferred3. No other item for discussion.S.C.BhatnagarC.E.O.
Minutes <strong>of</strong> emergent <strong>meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Directors <strong>of</strong>Supreme Court Bar Association Multi State CooperativeGroup Housing Society Ltd. (Regd) held on <strong>28</strong>.04.08 at4.30 P.M. in Society’s <strong>of</strong>fice.Today’s <strong>meeting</strong> was an adjourned <strong>meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> 26 th April 08 where in itwas agreed that Expert report will be considered in the Board <strong>meeting</strong>on Monday the <strong>28</strong> th April 08 at 4.30 P.M., and the Board will considerand finalize about the appointment <strong>of</strong> Architects.1. The Board members had a long <strong>meeting</strong> and discussions withboth the Architects. Nearly all the members except Ms. HemaSahu participated in the discussion, which went on from 4.30P.M. to 7. P.M. Two names were recommended / suggested bythe expert namely Pr<strong>of</strong>. Satish Khanna <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Planning &Architecture. However in his opinion he found Desgin ‘A’Architects is the best, in view <strong>of</strong> various factors emanated byhim, in his recommendation. Accordingly we have requested M/SDesign ‘A’ to give us a copy <strong>of</strong> lay out alternative Plans <strong>of</strong>proposed Flats, and a sample <strong>of</strong> M O U for the consideration <strong>of</strong>Board by 29.04.08. It was also desired from Design A to provideus the details <strong>of</strong> services which shall be rendering and thosewhich are not included in the terms <strong>of</strong> contract, for which thesociety will have to make arrangements.2. Likewise M/S. Colleagues, whose name was found competitivebut second in merit as per the expert, were also requested toprovide similar details by 29.4.<strong>2008</strong>.The finalization <strong>of</strong> Architect is deferred for the time being <strong>till</strong> thenext <strong>meeting</strong> scheduled for 30/04/08 at 4.30 P.M., so as toverify the details, which both the Architects will submit.3. Regarding High Court’s Case, it was noted that since theapplicant has not approached the Board with any positive note interms <strong>of</strong> High Courts direction. The matter is further deferred. Itis further Resolved that the Chairman is authorized to giveVakalat nama in favour <strong>of</strong> Shri. Rakesh Tikku Advocate, who isappearing on behalf <strong>of</strong> society in Writ Petition No. 3787/06.S.C.BhatnagarC.E.O.
Page 1 and 2: 1 st emergent meeting</stro
Page 3 and 4: MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED: 15.2.
Page 5 and 6: Minutes of deferre
Page 7 and 8: Minutes of the def
Page 9 and 10: MINUTESAn Emergent Meeting
Page 11: Item No. 6 Any other matter with th
Page 15 and 16: Supreme Court Bar AssociationMulti-
Page 23 and 24: Minutes of Grievan
Page 25 and 26: the Court Administrator further als
Page 30 and 31: of Rs. 320,0000/-(
Page 32 and 33: The chairman suggested that the res
Page 38 and 39: -2-not to my notice. I was busy due
Page 40 and 41: -4-Any other Item.The Chairman info
Page 42 and 43: In the end Chairman thanked all pre
Page 44 and 45: It is unanimously agreed in conform
Page 46 and 47: Minutes of the Boa
Page 48 and 49: years of M/S. Deep
Page 52 and 53: ANY OTHER ITEM: The Board was appri
Page 62 and 63:
een written without doing any home
Page 64 and 65:
Minutes of the Boa
Page 66 and 67:
profile of
Page 68:
Agenda Item No. 6 Next meet
show all

1-minutes-of-meeting-wef-28-1-2008-till-date - Asha on SCBA Multi ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?