12.07.2015 Views

1-minutes-of-meeting-wef-28-1-2008-till-date - Asha on SCBA Multi ...

1-minutes-of-meeting-wef-28-1-2008-till-date - Asha on SCBA Multi ...

1-minutes-of-meeting-wef-28-1-2008-till-date - Asha on SCBA Multi ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-2-not to my notice. I was busy due to some pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al lastminute engagement and did not reach the society <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fice <strong>on</strong>1/8/08 for the <str<strong>on</strong>g>meeting</str<strong>on</strong>g>. I received notice 9/8/08, wherein it wasstated “<str<strong>on</strong>g>minutes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the deferred <str<strong>on</strong>g>meeting</str<strong>on</strong>g> held <strong>on</strong> 2/8/08” Furtherreading the <str<strong>on</strong>g>minutes</str<strong>on</strong>g>, I noticed that grievance committee placedcertain suggesti<strong>on</strong>s (then and there in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>meeting</str<strong>on</strong>g> without priorcirculati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any report or agenda for the same) The same wasbased <strong>on</strong> the disputed cases pending and therein in the boardfinally resolved making some very harsh decisi<strong>on</strong> withoutc<strong>on</strong>sidering byelaws <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Society and Rules <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <strong>Multi</strong>-statecooperative Society Act, 2002, hence illegal. She further statedthat the <str<strong>on</strong>g>minutes</str<strong>on</strong>g> “HAD BEEN INCORPORATED IN THE MINUTESOF THE BOARD MEETING DT 02/08/0<str<strong>on</strong>g>2008</str<strong>on</strong>g> TO DEPRIVE HERFATHER FROM GETTING THE FLAT IN THE NOIDA PROJECTINTENTIONALLY AND KNOWINGLY, in her absence.The statement “SHE THREATENED IF THIS CLAUSE IS NOTWITHDRAWN SHE WOULD GET THIS WORK DONE FROM THECOURT OF LAW”Is a lie and I never wished to add or delete any clause for myc<strong>on</strong>venience.Further I will definitely go to court <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> law if this Board bymajority decisi<strong>on</strong>, try to do any illegal work.And I never threatened any <strong>on</strong>e, as a lawyer I said that if mygrievances are not addressed, then I will take the legal course.The statement “SHE FURTHER THREATENED “IF I AM NOT ABLETO SAVE THE FLAT OF MY FATHER, AS I CONTESTED AND GOTELECTED AS A DIRECTOR TO SAVE THE FLAT OF MY FATHERTHEN THERE IS NO USE FOR ME TO BE A DIRECTOR OF THISSOCIETY.She states “Please d<strong>on</strong>’t worry about the flat <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> my father, as hewill surely get it as per the present legal scenario. As far asc<strong>on</strong>testing the said electi<strong>on</strong>s are c<strong>on</strong>cerned, you will recall thatthe members specifically voted for paid members, as they rightlythought that <strong>on</strong>ly the members who have paid for theproject will be truly interested in the completi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> theproject. So was my thinking and in order to save MY as WELLAS THEFLAT OF MY FATHER, I CONTESTED THE ELECTION.However being elected was not in my hand and it was the purechoice <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the members c<strong>on</strong>sidered me a fit pers<strong>on</strong> for the saidpost, as I posses the required experience, desire, capability andh<strong>on</strong>esty to perform the duties associated with this post.“Further I would like to say that whether my father getshis flat or not IC<strong>on</strong>t.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!