12.07.2015 Views

Reference Manual - IARC Screening Group

Reference Manual - IARC Screening Group

Reference Manual - IARC Screening Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancerexamining a biopsy specimen of cervical tissue. In some women thesepremalignant cells, if left untreated, will slowly replace the normal cellson the surface of the cervix and CIS will develop. Finally, when the cellsbegin to grow through the normal surface layer into the muscle anddeeper tissues, full-blown cancer is present.RISK FACTORS FOR CERVICAL CANCEREpidemiologic studies have identified a number of factors that play asignificant role in the development of CIN, a precursor to cervical cancer(Palank 1998). As shown in Table 2-1, both the type and the pattern ofsexual activity, especially in teenagers, are major factors in determiningwhether a person becomes infected with HPV. As a result of relaxedattitudes about sexuality among adolescents in many cultures, the numberof sexual partners that teenagers have before age 20 can be quite large,and each of their partners also may have had multiple partners. As aconsequence, this pattern of sexual activity increases their risk ofexposure to STIs, especially HPV.Table 2-1. Risk Factors for Cervical CancerRISK FACTORSSexual activity (< 20 years)Multiple sexual partnersExposure to STIMother or sister with cervical cancerPrevious abnormal Pap smearSmokingImmunosuppression:• HIV/AIDS• Chronic corticosteroid use (asthma and lupus)Another risk factor is having a blood relative (mother or sister) withcervical cancer. Magnusson, Sparen and Gyllensten (1999) compared theincidence of dysplasia and CIS in relatives of women with disease and inage-matched controls. They found a significant familial clustering amongbiological, but not adoptive, relatives. For biological mothers comparedto control cases, the relative risk was 1.8, whereas for adoptive mothersthe relative risk was not significantly different from controls (1.1). Forbiological full sisters, the relative risk was even higher (1.9), versus 1.1for nonbiological sisters. These data provide strong epidemiologicalevidence for a genetic link to the development of cervical cancer and itsprecursors.2-4 Cervical Cancer Prevention Guidelines for Low-Resource Settings

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!