13.07.2015 Views

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong> Coral Reefs <strong>after</strong> Bleach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Hurricanes <strong>in</strong> <strong>2005</strong>Tr<strong>in</strong>idad <strong>and</strong> TobagoIn t r o d u c t i o nThe <strong>reefs</strong> <strong>of</strong> the isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tobago are far more extensive than those on the larger isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>Tr<strong>in</strong>idad. Tobago’s <strong>reefs</strong> are a mixture <strong>of</strong> biogenic <strong>reefs</strong> (built by <strong>coral</strong>s <strong>and</strong> <strong>coral</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e algae) <strong>and</strong>geological <strong>reefs</strong> (base <strong>of</strong> rock, colonized by hard <strong>coral</strong>s). Most <strong>of</strong> the <strong>reefs</strong> are ‘shallow’ <strong>in</strong> theirstructure, end<strong>in</strong>g abruptly <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>and</strong> seabed at depths between 15 m <strong>and</strong> 25 m.Stat u s o f Co r a l Reefs Pr i o r to <strong>2005</strong>The most commonly occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>coral</strong>s are the Montastraea annularis complex, which occupied37% <strong>of</strong> the substrate, with fire <strong>coral</strong>s (Millepora spp.) contribut<strong>in</strong>g 12%, <strong>and</strong> the ‘bra<strong>in</strong>’ <strong>coral</strong>s,Colpophyllia natans <strong>and</strong> Diploria strigosa, contribut<strong>in</strong>g 11% <strong>and</strong> 9% respectively. Agaricia spp.<strong>and</strong> the branch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>coral</strong>s (Porites porites, P. furcata <strong>and</strong> P. divaricata) are far less abundant thanon many other <strong>Caribbean</strong> <strong>reefs</strong>. This is similar for macro-algae, which covered less than 3% <strong>of</strong>the substratum, with uncolonized rock account<strong>in</strong>g for 41%. Coral disease, tissue necrosis orturf-algal/cyanobacterial overgrowth <strong>of</strong> bleached or unbleached <strong>coral</strong>s has not been recordeddur<strong>in</strong>g previous surveys, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the <strong>reefs</strong> were predom<strong>in</strong>antly healthy prior to <strong>2005</strong>.Effects o f t h e <strong>2005</strong> Bl e a c h i n g Ev e n tFollow<strong>in</strong>g warn<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> potential <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>2005</strong>, the Buccoo Reef Trust <strong>and</strong> Coral CayConservation assessed 22 discreet reef sites on the <strong>Caribbean</strong> coast <strong>in</strong> October/November.Surveys at two deep (~12 m) <strong>and</strong> two shallow (~7 m) sites showed that <strong>coral</strong> cover was highlyvariable around the isl<strong>and</strong>. The mean cover was 21.4% (SD ± 12.9%), with the maximum coverrecorded be<strong>in</strong>g 60% at Pirate’s Bay on the north-west coast. Coral cover was greater at deepersites (~24%) than shallower ones (~19%).The first <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> was noticed <strong>in</strong> Palythoa <strong>and</strong> fire <strong>coral</strong>s (Millepora) <strong>in</strong> September <strong>2005</strong>.By October/November, <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> affected 66% <strong>of</strong> hard <strong>coral</strong>s (71% on deeper sites <strong>and</strong> 63%on shallow sites). The extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> was largely consistent throughout, with most sitesshow<strong>in</strong>g extensive <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (> 85%). However, there was less than 20% <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> along 9transects, 5 <strong>of</strong> which were located near Speyside <strong>in</strong> the northeast <strong>of</strong> Tobago. This may <strong>in</strong>dicateeither localized tolerance to <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> or better water quality with either less polluted water orcooler water enter<strong>in</strong>g the area.The <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> was highly variable with<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> between species. Agaricia agaricites<strong>and</strong> Siderastrea radians were most affected, with 93% <strong>of</strong> colonies be<strong>in</strong>g bleached. Madracismirabilis <strong>and</strong> Acropora palmata were the least affected species (3% <strong>and</strong> 0% respectively).The once prom<strong>in</strong>ent A. palmata is becom<strong>in</strong>g particularly rare throughout the <strong>Caribbean</strong>,however there was no <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> seen on the few colonies on or adjacent to the transects. Theaverage <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> among species <strong>of</strong> the Montastraea annularis complex was 73%,although there was great variability between these species. For example, at one site at BuccooReef, one st<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> M. annularis exhibited 97% <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> while <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> affected only 6% <strong>of</strong>the surface area <strong>of</strong> an adjacent st<strong>and</strong>. This probably demonstrates the presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>resistant clades (genetic varieties) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>coral</strong> <strong>and</strong>/or the algal symbionts.102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!