13.07.2015 Views

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong> Coral Reefs <strong>after</strong> Bleach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Hurricanes <strong>in</strong> <strong>2005</strong>ASSESSING RECOVERY OF REEFS IN BELIZEThe recovery <strong>of</strong> Belize’s <strong>reefs</strong> from the comb<strong>in</strong>ed impacts <strong>of</strong> mass <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong>Hurricane Mitch <strong>in</strong> 1998 were <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> early <strong>2005</strong> to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether no-takeprotection status could accelerate potential recovery (i.e. <strong>in</strong>crease resilience as def<strong>in</strong>edby 4 <strong>in</strong>dices: the abundance/diversity <strong>of</strong> benthic functional groups; hard <strong>coral</strong> diversity;<strong>coral</strong> recruitment; <strong>and</strong> herbivore abundance). Data were collected <strong>in</strong> <strong>2005</strong> at 3 highlyprotected sites <strong>and</strong> 3 reference sites <strong>and</strong> compared with data collected prior to orimmediately <strong>after</strong> the 1998 event. There has been little recovery s<strong>in</strong>ce 1998, with live<strong>coral</strong> cover at the 6 sites rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g less than 15%.Because <strong>of</strong> the high level protection, it was predicted that the no-take <strong>reefs</strong> would exhibitsignificantly greater live <strong>coral</strong> cover <strong>and</strong> juvenile <strong>coral</strong> densities, <strong>and</strong> lower macroalgalcover than the fished <strong>reefs</strong>. However, there was no significant difference <strong>in</strong> mean live<strong>coral</strong> cover <strong>and</strong> <strong>coral</strong> diversity between fished <strong>and</strong> no-take <strong>reefs</strong>. Moreover, the density <strong>of</strong>juvenile <strong>coral</strong>s was greater on fished <strong>reefs</strong> <strong>and</strong> the cover <strong>of</strong> macroalgae was significantlygreater on unfished <strong>reefs</strong>.From: Nadia Bood (nbood@wwfca.org), Melanie McField (mcfield@healthy<strong>reefs</strong>.org) <strong>and</strong>Rich Aronson (raronson@disl.org).2Percent <strong>coral</strong> cover (300m )4030201001997 1999 <strong>2005</strong>2Percent macroalgae cover (300m )353025201510501997 1999 <strong>2005</strong>YearYearCoral species diversity (H')1.81.61.41.21.00.80.60.40.20.01997 1999 <strong>2005</strong>2Juvenile <strong>coral</strong>s per m10864202001 <strong>2005</strong>YearMean UnfishedYearMean Fished50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!