Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Status of Caribbean Coral Reefs after Bleaching and Hurricanes in 2005resulted from subsequent infection of white plague disease. The average number of species pertransect also declined by 21%.Agency Region Category % Bleaching % MortalityNPS I&M /USGSSt. Croix,St. JohnOverall90 51.5A. agaricites 87C. natans 78M. annularis(complex)P. porites 48Agaricia spp. 87*C. natans 35*Diploria spp. 17*NPS / USGS St. Croix, M. annularisSt. John (complex)12/55*P. porites 15*UVI Region-wide Overall 57 40Montastraea reef -70-90total lossMontastraea reef –Montastraea loss83-95BB / NPS St. Croix October 53December 28USGS VINP A. palmata 15/36NPS BIRNM A. palmata 79.8 58.1Summary of results of surveys conducted by several agencies (explained in the text) to determinethe impacts of the 2005 bleaching / disease event in USVI. * indicates that percentages have beencalculated as the proportion of the total number of colonies of each coral species surveyed. All otherpercentages have been calculated from coral cover data. Where two values are separated by /, the firstvalue reports the percentage cover or proportion of colonies that suffered complete mortality, and thesecond reports the percentage of partial mortality.The fate of 4153 coral colonies on the 100 transects was tracked by NPS and USGS. Coloniesof Agaricia spp. were the most severely affected by bleaching with 87% mortality, and 35% ofC. natans, 17% of Diploria spp. and 15% of P. porites colonies had died within 6 months of thepeak bleaching in September 2005. The M. annularis (complex) initially exhibited substantialrecovery from bleaching, but subsequently, there was high mortality as a result of white plaguecoral disease, with 12% of colonies dying completely and about 55% showing partial colonymortality.5170
Coral Reefs of the U.S. CaribbeanBleaching and mortality in territorial waters followed a similar pattern to that observed withinthe national parks. Researchers from the University of the Virgin Islands reported an averageof 57% of the coral cover bleaching (74% of individual colonies) at a range of depths, whichresulted in only a 4% decline in coral cover. However, there was a subsequent increase intissue-eroding white syndrome, from 0.5% of colonies infected prior to and during bleaching,to 4% after the bleaching. This was probably responsible for a 40% decline in coral coveracross the territory. In two deep (20-30 m) areas that formerly had high Montastraea cover(~36%), there was a 70-90% decline in total coral cover, resulting predominantly from the lossof Montastraea (83-95% cover loss).At 30 m depth along this Montastraea reef system, NCCOS/Biogeography Branch (BB) and NPSrecorded a significant decrease in average coral cover between 2005 and 2006, from 8.69% (±1.6) in 2005 to 6.60% (± 1.3) in 2006, representing a 24% decline in coral cover. The differencebetween this estimate and the 70-90% decline described above is most likely explained bythe patchy spatial distribution of corals along this reef system and differences in samplingtechniques. The overall conclusion is that coral cover declined significantly between 2005 and2006.In October 2005, the BB and NPS BIRMN observed bleaching in 22 scleractinian coral speciesin north-eastern St. Croix, with nearly 53% of the coral cover bleached at 91 of 94 randomlyselected sites (depth range 3-28 m). The average coral cover at these sites was 5.6%. Bleachingwas widespread, with no obvious spatial pattern. Coral species most affected by the bleachingevent included D. labyrinthiformis, Agaricia spp., Mycetophyllia spp., and M. annularis. ByDecember 2005, bleaching was still evident, with colonies at 15 of 18 randomly selected sitesstill bleached. Only 28% of the 3.9% total coral cover was bleached, and an additional 4%colonized by cyanobacteria or other algae (i.e. recently dead), but there was evidence of coralsrecovering from bleaching.The first time that bleached A. palmata colonies had been observed in the USVI was in July 2005,with 50% of 460 colonies in VINP, St. John showing some bleaching. This eventually resulted in36% (± 7.4) of colonies suffering partial mortality and 15% (± 8.5) dying completely. Mortalityof A. palmata rose during 2005, but was not always directly related to bleaching. Isolatedincidences of disease and bleaching contributed to the rise in mortality. Bleaching was notfollowed by severe outbreaks of disease except at one site, Hawksnest Bay, where a combinationof disease and bleaching caused greater mortality within 3 months than other stresses (e.g.predation, physical damage) had caused during the previous 2.5 years. All surviving coloniesregained normal coloration by February 2006.There was also extensive bleaching of A. palmata in 2005 at BIRMN, St. Croix. Bleaching wasobserved between August 2005 and January 2006, with greatest bleaching recorded at SouthForereef in November 2005, where 79.8% (± 9.1) tissue bleached, followed by 58.1% (± 9.8)tissue mortality. The greatest tissue mortality (66.4% (± 8.7)), occurred at the UnderwaterTrail. There was 36.4% (± 12.5) tissue mortality at the North Bar. Colonies on the back-reefappeared to be more affected than colonies elsewhere, raising the possibility that reduced waterflow and calmer conditions exacerbated the bleaching and resulted in greater mortality.71
Page 1 and 2:
Stat u s o fCa r i b b e a nCo r a
Page 3 and 4:
Dedication: This book is dedicated
Page 5 and 6:
Status of Caribbean Coral Reefs aft
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24: Status of Caribbean Coral Reefs aft
Page 25 and 26: Status of Coral Reefs in the Caribb
Page 35 and 36: 3. Hu r r i ca n e s a n d t h e i
Page 37 and 38: Hurricanes and their Effect on Cora
Page 39 and 40: Hurricanes and their Effect on Cora
Page 41 and 42: 4. Th e 2005 Bl e a c h i n g Ev e
Page 43 and 44: The 2005 Bleaching Event: Coral-Lis
Page 49 and 50: 5. Stat u s o f t h e Mesoamerican
Page 51 and 52: Status of the Mesoamerican Reef aft
Page 65 and 66: 6. Co r a l Reefs o f t h e U.S. Ca
Page 67 and 68: Coral Reefs of the U.S. Caribbean19
Page 69 and 70: Coral Reefs of the U.S. CaribbeanMe
Page 71 and 72: Coral Reefs of the U.S. Caribbeanwe
Page 73: Coral Reefs of the U.S. CaribbeanSe
Page 77 and 78: 7. Th e Effects o f Co r a l Bl e a
Page 79 and 80: The Effects of Coral Bleaching in t
Page 107 and 108: 9. Th e Effects o f Co r a l Bl e a
Page 109 and 110: The Effects of Coral Bleaching in S
Page 117 and 118: 10. Ma n ag i n g f o r Ma s s Co r
Page 119 and 120: Managing for Mass Coral Bleaching:
Page 125 and 126:
Managing for Mass Coral Bleaching:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
show all

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?