13.07.2015 Views

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Coral Reefs <strong>of</strong> the U.S. <strong>Caribbean</strong>Sea surface temperatures (SSTs) <strong>in</strong> <strong>2005</strong> exceeded those <strong>of</strong> 2004, especially between August <strong>and</strong>November (solid l<strong>in</strong>e) when they exceeded the <strong>coral</strong> <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> threshold <strong>of</strong> 29.5°C <strong>in</strong> the USVI (dashedl<strong>in</strong>e). The accumulation <strong>of</strong> ‘Degree Heat<strong>in</strong>g Weeks’ (DHW) is shown along the X-axis <strong>in</strong> red alongwith the tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> watches <strong>and</strong> warn<strong>in</strong>gs issued <strong>in</strong> 2004 <strong>and</strong> the major alerts <strong>in</strong> <strong>2005</strong>from August to November. The thermal condition is categorized accord<strong>in</strong>g to the five <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> alertlevels def<strong>in</strong>ed by Coral Reef Watch’s Satellite Bleach<strong>in</strong>g Alert. Source: http://<strong>coral</strong>reefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/current/sst_dhw_series_usvirg<strong>in</strong>_cur.htmlEffects o f t h e <strong>2005</strong> Bl e a c h i n g Ev e n tDecl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>coral</strong> cover <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> macroalgae result<strong>in</strong>g from a variety <strong>of</strong> stresses <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<strong>hurricanes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>coral</strong> disease have been reported previously <strong>in</strong> the USVI. For example, major<strong>coral</strong> losses occurred <strong>in</strong> the 1970s <strong>and</strong> 1980s as a result <strong>of</strong> white b<strong>and</strong> disease, kill<strong>in</strong>g more than90% <strong>of</strong> Acropora cervicornis <strong>and</strong> A. palmata colonies, the primary shallow water reef build<strong>in</strong>g<strong>coral</strong>s. However, the 51.5% decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> mean <strong>coral</strong> cover dur<strong>in</strong>g the 12 months follow<strong>in</strong>g themajor <strong>2005</strong>/06 <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> disease event was unprecedented. These losses occurred on welldeveloped ‘high’ <strong>coral</strong> cover, high <strong>coral</strong> diversity <strong>reefs</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g monitored by the National ParksService. Even deep <strong>reefs</strong> with high <strong>coral</strong> cover (>30% cover, >30 m) were affected by <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>and</strong> disease.National Park Service Inventory <strong>and</strong> Monitor<strong>in</strong>g (NPS I&M) <strong>and</strong> US Geological Survey (USGS)scientists documented the effects <strong>of</strong> the <strong>2005</strong> <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> subsequent <strong>coral</strong> disease at longtermmonitor<strong>in</strong>g sites around St. John <strong>and</strong> St. Croix. An average <strong>of</strong> 90% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>coral</strong> coverbleached at 5 permanent sites (100 transects at depths between 4 m <strong>and</strong> 19 m) <strong>in</strong> St. John<strong>and</strong> St. Croix, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Virg<strong>in</strong> Isl<strong>and</strong>s National Park (VINP) <strong>and</strong> Buck Isl<strong>and</strong> Reef NationalMonument (BIRMN). By late <strong>2005</strong>, many <strong>of</strong> the <strong>coral</strong>s began to rega<strong>in</strong> color; but then became<strong>in</strong>fected by the white plague <strong>coral</strong> disease. In just one year, the average decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>coral</strong> coverat these sites was 51.5% (range 34.1% - 61.8%). There were massive decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the majorreef build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>coral</strong> species: the Montastraea annularis (complex) once comprised 80% <strong>of</strong>the total <strong>coral</strong> cover, but suffered a 51% decl<strong>in</strong>e compared with pre-<strong>2005</strong> levels; the cover <strong>of</strong>Agaricia agaricites, Colpophyllia natans <strong>and</strong> Porites porites decl<strong>in</strong>ed by 87%, 78%, <strong>and</strong> 48%respectively. However, there was no change <strong>in</strong> cover <strong>of</strong> M. cavernosa. While mortality <strong>of</strong> A.agaricites was directly attributable to <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, mortality <strong>in</strong> nearly all other <strong>coral</strong> species69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!