13.07.2015 Views

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Mesoamerican Reef <strong>after</strong> the <strong>2005</strong> Coral Bleach<strong>in</strong>g Event<strong>in</strong> <strong>2005</strong>, with <strong>hurricanes</strong> Emily (17 July) <strong>and</strong> Wilma (21 October) hitt<strong>in</strong>g Cozumel, caus<strong>in</strong>gdamage ma<strong>in</strong>ly to shallow <strong>coral</strong> <strong>reefs</strong> (< 8 m depth), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sponges <strong>and</strong> gorgonians.There was a dramatic <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> bare rock substrata along Cozumel’s west coast <strong>after</strong><strong>hurricanes</strong> Emily <strong>and</strong> Wilma (July <strong>and</strong> October, <strong>2005</strong>) <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g from 10% to 40% coverage,as a result <strong>of</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> benthic biota. Conversely, hard <strong>coral</strong> cover decreased<strong>after</strong> each hurricane from 24% to 17% <strong>and</strong> eventually down to 10%. After Emily, piles <strong>of</strong>broken <strong>coral</strong> colonies were seen scattered around the <strong>reefs</strong>, while <strong>after</strong> Wilma the <strong>coral</strong> rubblewas removed from the reef areas, probably because <strong>of</strong> the long duration <strong>and</strong> high <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong>that hurricane.Reefs <strong>of</strong>f the northern Yucatan tip were also affected. Deeper <strong>reefs</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ed little damage,with some sedimentation <strong>in</strong>creases down to 15-20 m; although the sediments were usuallyremoved by currents with<strong>in</strong> a few weeks. In Cancún <strong>and</strong> Puerto Morelos, impacts were ma<strong>in</strong>lyon the reef crest <strong>and</strong> primarily to branch<strong>in</strong>g, boulder <strong>and</strong> mound hard <strong>coral</strong>s. Restoration <strong>of</strong>fragmented pieces was carried out shortly <strong>after</strong> for <strong>reefs</strong> with<strong>in</strong> Cancún <strong>and</strong> Puerto MorelosMar<strong>in</strong>e Parks.<strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>reefs</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2006: M<strong>in</strong>imal <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> was observed on Mahahual <strong>and</strong> Sian Ka’an <strong>reefs</strong><strong>in</strong> 2006; about 5-6% <strong>of</strong> 1858 assessed colonies were affected. The <strong>reefs</strong> seem to have recoveredfrom the <strong>2005</strong> <strong>bleach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> event, <strong>and</strong> the disease <strong>and</strong> recent mortality values were very low;<strong>coral</strong> cover recorded at 121 sites (n = 3113 colonies) along the Mexican <strong>Caribbean</strong> (Amigos deSian Ka’an <strong>and</strong> The Nature Conservancy /WWF 2006 Rapid Reef Assessment) was unusuallylow. However, this may be related to the representative sampl<strong>in</strong>g design, which <strong>in</strong>cluded manymarg<strong>in</strong>al reef sites <strong>and</strong> only a few sites with <strong>coral</strong> cover values around 20-30%.Low levels <strong>of</strong> recently diseased or dead <strong>coral</strong>s were assessed on the Qu<strong>in</strong>tana Roo <strong>reefs</strong> (from IslaContoy to Xcalak, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Cozumel <strong>and</strong> Banco Ch<strong>in</strong>chorro) <strong>in</strong> September <strong>2005</strong> – December 2006dur<strong>in</strong>g the Amigos de Sian Ka’an <strong>and</strong> TNC/WWF Rapid Reef Assessment.Reef Habitat (n = number <strong>of</strong> coloniesassessed)Coral Cover(%)Colonies Affectedby Disease (%)Recent ColonyMortality (%)Fore-reef (n = 1886 colonies) 8 0.9 1Reef flat (<strong>in</strong>ter-tidal (n = 704 colonies) 6 0.2 0.8Patch reef & others (n = 523 colonies) 9 1.0 0.9S<strong>and</strong> beaches from Punta Cancun to Punta Nizuc were lost as a result <strong>of</strong> Hurricane Wilma <strong>in</strong>late <strong>2005</strong>. In February 2006, the municipality implemented a project to restore the beaches;however, this project resulted <strong>in</strong> the die-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 10 species <strong>of</strong> hard <strong>coral</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Punta Nizuc ow<strong>in</strong>gto erosion <strong>of</strong> the reclaimed beach areas.Socioeconomic impacts <strong>and</strong> management responses: Mexico’s <strong>Caribbean</strong> <strong>reefs</strong> function ascritical fish<strong>in</strong>g grounds for communities along the Qu<strong>in</strong>tana Roo coast. These <strong>reefs</strong> are alsothe center <strong>of</strong> tourism activities; 8 MPAs have been established to protect <strong>reefs</strong>, <strong>and</strong> there arenew MPAs proposed, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Playa del Carmen, Akumal, Puerto Aventuras <strong>and</strong> Tulum <strong>and</strong>Cozumel.55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!