The movement of a human being in the medical exoskeleton – the anthropomotoric aspectsment the knowledge and experience already acquiredin this area through, among others, reeducation of thefunction (walking, the function of upper limbs) lost in theresult of neurological deficits in the course of rehabilitationand neurological physiotherapy, through the impactof repetitive exercises on the effectiveness, through thespeed of the return of the above-mentioned function, orthrough the use of the rehabilitation robots.Steering of the exoskeletonFrom cybernetic viewpoint, the healthy people whileattempting to make a movement – depending on theintention to make a movement and the conditions of theenvironment – modulate the patterns of the activationof muscles. Various functional tasks require developmentof a set of various patterns, including the sequentialactivation of particular patterns, and stepping upthe power of muscles and its direction. Some disabledpeople (e.g. in result of a stroke or damage of the spinalcord) have limited capabilities in this area or eventheir total absence, as far as particular muscles areconcerned. It is most often caused by the damage ofthe nervous system in the way that prevents the patientfrom conducting the above-mentioned modulations ina controlled way.Exoskeletons are being equipped with an interfaceof the user, in traditional understanding of thatconcept, although exoskeletons ReWalk, eLegs andHULC possess partial interfaces for the choice of thework module. The user is steering the exoskeletons inthe process of an interaction between a human beingand a machine, cooperating with the exoskeleton viahuman-machine interface. HMI interface, working inNumberof articles625Comparison of the frequency of the phrases’appearancesexoskeleto<strong>nr</strong>oboticexoskeleto<strong>nr</strong>oboticexoskeleton +biomechanicsroboticexoskeleton+rehabilitationFigure 2. Results of investigation of the PubMed database (U.S. National Library of Medicine) [11]7623507roboticexoskeleton+physicaltherapyname ofthephrase– 117 –
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Mikołajewskireal time on neuro-muscle level, may lead to intuitivesteering of the exoskeleton and the user’s full integrationwith it. The user perceives the exoskeleton then,as an extension (expanding the capabilities) of his ownbody [12].In the simplest sense of the term, the full cycle ofthe steering of the exoskeleton covers the followingstages realized in the real time:• reading from sensors the intention of the user tomake a movement,• interpretation of that intention while taking into accountthe up-to-date behavior and the programmedpatterns of movement,• interaction of the exoskeleton movement with theuser’s movement while simultaneously strengtheningthe power, reducing the support or even replacingthe deficient part of the user’s body (accordingto needs),• analysis of the final position, and launching the successivecycle [6, 7, 8].The proper realization of the above-mentioned algorithmis being fulfilled by the subordinated detailedfunctioning of the whole (most often doubled) exoskeletonsteering system. It ensures at the same time:• maintenance of the movement and particular positionswithin the frames of natural patterns or thepatterns close to natural for a particular user – themost interesting aspect from biomechanical point ofview,• comfortable and bearable use of the exoskeleton ina long period of exploitation, at altered effort, andmultiple repetitions [8].Human-machine interactionBelow a description of the chosen solutions to the areaof human-machine interaction used in the contemporaryexoskeletons is placed.Myoprocessors [12] are realized in the course ofHMI computationally as the real time models of all themuscles covered by support. These models, workingin combination with the functioning muscle, allowconducting the anticipatory identification of which ofthe muscles – and in what way – will be successivelyactivated. By that means, one can – on the basis of kinematicsof the joints and levels of the activation on theneuronal level – anticipate, for instance, the momentsin joints. It is also possible, due to the fact that eachuser has at his disposal the source of natural movementpatterns, either fairly limited or relatively close tothe natural. The set is also learning in the process ofadjusting the exoskeleton to the user’s needs and inthe process of its entire exploitation. These patternsenable creating the internal database for the needs ofHMI, which allow the calculation, for example of the initialstages of each movement and the assessment andeventual correction of the supporting of the movementby the exoskeleton. These procedures are quite complicatedand they require the involvement of artificialintelligence (for instance GA – genetic algorithms, andsuch complex muscle models as Hill phenomenologicalmuscle model). The recent studies have indicated higheffectiveness of that kind of solutions, as sufficient toolsfor practical use [12].For the time being, the most common type of controlis steering of the exoskeleton with simultaneous applicationof all solutions or the ones chosen from thefollowing solutions:• electro-myographic sensors,• gyroscopic sensors of the position,• sensors of the power of pressure on the foundation,• sensors of acceleration,• sensors of the angles of bending the joints oflimbs,• ultimately (during the research): brain-computer interfaceand steering of the exoskeleton as the comprehensiveand advanced neuroprosthetics [1, 2, 3,13].Conducting electromyography [14] is commonlyused, due to the fact that EMG signals reflect directlythe intention of the user to make a movement. Varioussolutions are examined in this respect:• the exoskeletons for lower limbs with various levelsof the freedom of movement (from level one upwards)in the knee joint, less frequently also in theankle joint (although it is very important for the properwalk) – mostly used for supporting the movementof the disabled people,• the exoskeletons for lower limbs ankle-knee-hipwith the artificial (according to needs) substitutes ofall important muscles – mostly used for re-educationof walk, including the patients with hemiplegiawith the regulated relieve of both the paralyzed andthe healthy sides,• the exoskeletons supporting also the movement ofthe upper limbs: the movement of an arm and themovement in the elbow joint, less frequently in the– 118 –
- Page 2:
ISSN 1731-0652COMMITTEE FOR REHABIL
- Page 5 and 6:
ANTROPOMOTORYKAISSN 1731-0652KOMITE
- Page 7 and 8:
NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 9 and 10:
From Editorsching stimulus had a po
- Page 12 and 13:
NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 14 and 15:
NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 16:
ORIGINAL PAPERSPRACE ORYGINALNE
- Page 19 and 20:
Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 21 and 22:
Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 23 and 24:
Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 25 and 26:
Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 28 and 29:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 30 and 31:
The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 32 and 33:
The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 34 and 35:
The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 36 and 37:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 38 and 39:
Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 40 and 41:
Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 42 and 43:
Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 44:
Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 47 and 48:
Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 49 and 50:
Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 51 and 52:
Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 53 and 54:
Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 55 and 56:
Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 58 and 59:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 60 and 61:
Assessment of the effectiveness of
- Page 62 and 63:
Assessment of the effectiveness of
- Page 64 and 65:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 66 and 67:
Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 68 and 69: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 70 and 71: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 72 and 73: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 74 and 75: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 76 and 77: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 78 and 79: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 80 and 81: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 82: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 85 and 86: Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 87 and 88: Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 89 and 90: Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 91 and 92: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoCe
- Page 93 and 94: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoD.
- Page 95 and 96: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 97 and 98: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 99 and 100: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 101 and 102: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward Mleczkoof
- Page 104 and 105: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 106 and 107: Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 108 and 109: Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 110 and 111: Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 112 and 113: Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 114: REVIEW PAPERSPRACE PRZEGLĄDOWE
- Page 117: Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko
- Page 121 and 122: Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko