NR <strong>57</strong> <strong>2012</strong>ANTROPOMOTORYKATHE IMPACT OF RAPID WEIGHT LOSSON THE COMPETITIVE PREPARATION OF JUDOISTSWPŁYW REDUKCJI MASY CIAŁA NA DYSPOZYCJĘSTARTOWĄ ZAWODNIKÓW JUDODariusz Boguszewski*, Katarzyna Boguszewska**, Jakub Adamczyk**** PhD, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland** MSc, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Poland*** PhD, Medical University of Warsaw, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, PolandKey words: judo, rapid weight loss, competition, competitive preparationSłowa kluczowe: judo, szybka redukcja masy ciała, zawody, przygotowanie startoweSUMMARY • STRESZCZENIEAim of the study. Judo is a sport based on weight category divisions. The purpose of the research was toestablish the relationship between pre-competition weight loss and competitive preparations, as well as theinfluence of pre-competition weight loss on the competitive results of judo competitors.Material and methods. The research covered 28 judo competitors (13 juniors and 15 seniors). The researchmethod was the author’s questionnaire, selected tests of motor fitness by Denisiuk, and the Spielberger STAIself-evaluation questionnaire.Results. More than half (53.6%) of competitors in the research group reduced their weight regularly inpre-competition periods. The average reduction was 4.2% among juniors, and 5.4% among seniors. The mostcommonly applied body weight reduction methods included reducing the amount of food and liquids, increasedphysical activity, and treatments in the sauna. During the periods of body weight reduction, contestants feltdeterioration of mood, decreased strength and endurance, and headaches. Functional trials performed duringrapid weight loss pointed to regression of the results connected with the process of weight loss reduction. Inthe control (non-reducing) group, the differences were not significant. The anxiety level one day before thecompetition was higher in the reducing group. In the research (reducing) group, 46.7% of the participantsfulfilled result assumptions; in the non-reducing group, the proportion was 58.3%.Conclusions. In cases involving judoists, weight reduction in a short period of time has negative effects ontheir competitive (physical and psychological) preparation. The eventual reduction of body weight should beattempted under the control of professionals (coaches, physicians, physiotherapists).Wprowadzenie. Judo jest dyscypliną sportu, w której rywalizacja toczy się z podziałem na kategorie wagowe.Celem badań było ustalenie zależności między redukcją masy ciała a dyspozycją startową i wynikami sportowymijudoków.Materiał i metody. Badaniami objęto 28 zawodników (13 juniorów i 15 seniorów), przyjmując jako metodębadawczą wybrane próby sprawności motorycznej Denisiuka, kwestionariusze Spielbergera oraz ankietę autorską.Wyniki. Ponad połowa (tj. 53,6%) objętych badaniem zawodników regularnie obniżała masę ciała w okresieprzedstartowym. Redukcja ta wynosiła średnio 4,2% u juniorów, u seniorów zaś 5,4% masy ciała. Najczęściejstosowanymi metodami były: ograniczenie ilości przyjmowanych pokarmów i płynów, zwiększony wysiłek fizyczny,zabiegi w saunie. W trakcie redukcji masy ciała u zawodników występowało pogorszenie samopoczucia, obniżeniepoziomu siły i wytrzymałości oraz bóle głowy. Próby sprawności wykonywane przed i po redukcji masy ciaławskazały na znaczny regres wyników. W grupie, która nie redukowała masy ciała różnice nie były istotne. Poziom– 27 –
Dariusz Boguszewski, Katarzyna Boguszewska, Jakub Adamczyklęku jako stanu na dzień przed startem był wyższy w grupie, w której redukowano masę ciała. W grupie, którejuczestnicy nie redukowali masy ciała, założenia startowe zostały zrealizowane w 58,3%, podczas gdy w grupieredukującej masę ciała – w 46,7%.Wnioski. Redukcja masy ciała przed startem (w krótkim czasie) może negatywnie oddziaływać na fizycznąi psychiczną dyspozycję zawodników. Ewentualne obniżanie masy ciała powinno podlegać kontroli specjalistów:trenerów, lekarzy, fizjoterapeutów.IntroductionCombat sports are disciplines where competitionmeans direct confrontation between the competingparties. Judo is a martial art derived from the Japaneseschools of ju-jitsu. According to the principles of its creator,Jigoro Kano, it is not only a sport but also a systemof physical education, real combat, and intellectualeducation [1]. Taking into account the utilitarian aspect(non-sport confrontation), judo is a relatively mild meansof defense [2].Initially, judo competition was carried out withoutdivision into weight categories. Weight divisionswere introduced for the first time (as a test) during theBrussels European Championship in 1954. Since 1959the European Championships have regularly beenconducted in a few weight categories. In 1964, duringthe Olympic Games in Tokyo, the Olympic judo tournamentwas carried out for the first time. The competition,however, ran then along the lines of an open category.In the world competitions, the fights in various weightlimits started during the World Championship in 1965in Rio de Janeiro and the Olympic Games in Munich in1972 [3, 4].Current weight limits, in which the competitors participate,are a pre-condition for being admitted to compete.Therefore, judoists are obliged to adjust their bodyweight to a particular weight category in a given period oftime. The weigh-in is conducted on the morning beforethe competition. Competitors, perceiving better chancesin the competition in a lower category, use various methodsto reduce their body weight: limiting food and liquidconsumption, increased physical activity, intensive effortsto sweat, and medication [5–10]. This is not a practicethat is exclusively characteristic of judo competitors.In other sports where sportsmen are also divided intoweight categories, such as in wrestling, kickboxing, karateor taekwondo, competitors behave in similar ways[11–14]. Hence, the question arises: to what extent doessuch reduction influence the competitive results? Do notthe negative side effects nullify the advantages resultingfrom competing in a lower category?The main cognitive aim of the research was the establishmentof the relationship between pre-competitivereduction of the body weight of judo competitors and thecompetition disposition (physical and psychological), aswell as its effect upon the competitive results. The applicationaim was to draw attention to the problem ofthe competitors’ body weight reduction and to indicatedirections of effective management of the process ofpreparation for the competition.Material and methodsThe research covered 28 judo competitors (13 juniorand 15 senior). The average age of the participantswas 19.34 years, training experience 9.96 years, height178.04 cm, and body weight 80.29 kg. Of the competitors,8 had master class (MM or M), 13 – first sportsclass (I), and 7 – secondary class (II). The detailedcharacteristic of the examined group is illustrated inTable 1.To assess the physical condition of the competitors,select trials of Denisiuk’s motoric fitness test wereused. Among them were a trial that assessed the dynamicstrength of a shoulder girdle, back and stomach(double-handed throw of 3 kg medicine ball in a simpleforward kneeling position) and a trial that assessedthe explosive force of lower limbs (a long jump withouta run-up) [15].Psychological condition was assessed on the basisof Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)[16].Additionally, the participants completed the originalquestionnaire that elicited information concerning trainingexperience, judo rank, ways of reducing body weight(if competitor regularly reduced body weight), and subjectiveestimate of side effects of those activities.On the basis of the training diaries (and consultationswith coaches), the expected optimal result foreach tournament was defined for each contender.The first measurement (physical fitness test,Spielberger’s questionnaire, and the original questionnaire)was conducted 14 days before the scheduled– 28 –
- Page 2: ISSN 1731-0652COMMITTEE FOR REHABIL
- Page 5 and 6: ANTROPOMOTORYKAISSN 1731-0652KOMITE
- Page 7 and 8: NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 9 and 10: From Editorsching stimulus had a po
- Page 12 and 13: NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 14 and 15: NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 16: ORIGINAL PAPERSPRACE ORYGINALNE
- Page 19 and 20: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 21 and 22: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 23 and 24: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 25 and 26: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 30 and 31: The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 32 and 33: The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 34 and 35: The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 36 and 37: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 38 and 39: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 40 and 41: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 42 and 43: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 44: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 47 and 48: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 49 and 50: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 51 and 52: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 53 and 54: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 55 and 56: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 58 and 59: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 60 and 61: Assessment of the effectiveness of
- Page 62 and 63: Assessment of the effectiveness of
- Page 64 and 65: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 66 and 67: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 68 and 69: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 70 and 71: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 72 and 73: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 74 and 75: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 76 and 77: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 78 and 79:
Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 80 and 81:
Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 82:
Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 85 and 86:
Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 87 and 88:
Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 89 and 90:
Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 91 and 92:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoCe
- Page 93 and 94:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoD.
- Page 95 and 96:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 97 and 98:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 99 and 100:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 101 and 102:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward Mleczkoof
- Page 104 and 105:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 106 and 107:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 108 and 109:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 110 and 111:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 112 and 113:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 114:
REVIEW PAPERSPRACE PRZEGLĄDOWE
- Page 117 and 118:
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko
- Page 119 and 120:
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko
- Page 121 and 122:
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko