The movement of a human being in the medical exoskeleton – the anthropomotoric aspectswrist joint – used mostly to support the movementof the disabled people,• the advanced exoskeletons equipped with the supportof a palm, including 16 joints – four for eachfinger – used in the reeducation of the everydayactivities, also after surgeries.In steering the exoskeletons, particularly the prototypeones [15], the steering devices equipped withneuro-fuzzy controllers can be helpful since their easyadaptation to the EMG signals of the user [14, 15].Optimizing the power [16] is still a matter of interestsince the values obtained from experimental research,however useful, require additional modeling. A very precisereflection of the natural power is not necessary herebut its optimization in the given application is important.It concerns all the muscles and functions, walking included.To calculate the optimal powers in the real time, oneneeds to follow quite complicated operational mathematicalprocedures, often solving the problem of numerouscontradictions and inter-relations with the simultaneousmovement of other muscles. One of the methods allowingthe assessment of the muscle power on the basis ofthe EMG signal analysis, the Bogey’s and co-workers’method [17] is often used in different variants.The presupposition of involuntary reduction in humanstrength in the human-machine interface [18] isreflected in the hypothesis formulated by Lewis andFerris that users cooperating in the human-machineinterface involuntarily lower the power of muscles andthe moments in joints, which influences the resultantmoments of the user-exoskeleton interface. In effect,these values may differ from the natural ones achievedby the same human being. As for today, the research inthis field is being conducted and the initial results do notconfirm the above hypothesis, however, the effectiveimplementation of commercial exoskeletons requiresfull explanation of that problem.The improvement of the exoskeletons’ inertia [19] asone of the means aimed at providing the exoskeletonmovements with the agility natural for a human being,particularly in the area of the upper limbs movements,has caught the researchers’ attention. It is believedthat the exoskeleton numbness disturbs naturalness(also lowering the natural frequency) of the exoskeletonmovements of the human-user. Particular role may beplayed here by great accelerations given to some elementsof the exoskeleton, among others, in the substitutesof the hip and knee joints which can sometimescause the so called jerky movements of the exoskeletonwhile attempting a quick acceleration of a walk by theuser. Hence, the attempts to create the compensationalgorithms in that area are in interest [19].Proportional myoelectric control [20] intensifies theprocess of the user’s adaptation, both the one withdeficits, and the healthy one to steer the exoskeletonalso in case of the necessity to reduce and to diminishthe energy consumption. It is what makes the abovemethod the leading one in the market. In this method,the value of powers of the particular muscles is proportionalto the amplitudes of the equivalent EMG signals.It should be noted that EMG signals have to beprocessed here in the real time. It is suspected thatthe precision of movements in this method may not bean effect of a certain specific action of the descendingstimuli but may rather depend on the long-lasting exercises,proprioceptive feedback or mechanics of joints(e.g. the movement in the elbow may be less precisesince the associated movement in the wrist will expandit) [20, 21, 22].The control of an individual muscle [23] is realizedmainly by the “individual muscle-force control” supportedby the exoskeleton which allows obtaining muchbroader spectrum of data than with the help of suchconventional methods as gripping or pushing the handles.In the controlling of groups of muscles, there mayarise problems with coordination of the movementsof the synergistic muscles both in case of the healthypeople and the people with movement deficits in thatsphere. Although in exoskeletons the issue of the artificial“muscles” construction as such is of a secondaryimportance, the choice of the appropriate pneumatic orhydraulic elements as well as electric actuator may significantlyinfluence the algorithms of steering itself andthe construction of the steering system, e.g. in the fieldof the energetic optimization or using the numbness ofthe limbs movement.In accordance with all above-mentioned, two crucialproblems should be taken under consideration:1. Education and coordination of the user-exoskeletoninteraction in the situation of a temporary using ofthe exoskeleton (e.g. for the time of convalescencein case of weakening of the user, and also while usingthe exoskeleton as the support of the weakenedmuscles with its gradual reduction) as well as theestimation of the influence of the exoskeleton’s periodof exploitation upon the possibility of returningto the natural (self-reliant) patterns of movement.2. Not sufficiently examined effects of a long-time stayin the exoskeleton in case of using it as an alterna– 119 –
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Mikołajewskitive for a wheelchair (i.e. even 11–14 hours a day)resulting primarily from:• enforced repetition of the movement patterns,• the lack of natural reflexes implemented in theexoskeleton software,• the effect close to the human being lost in virtualreality: will the too profound trust in the machinenot make the user too much dependenton the machine, hampering or even preventinghim from functioning without it? Nowadays, forinstance, the stabilization of the balance of thehuman-exoskeleton set is entrusted to a humanbeing, since the proper automatic realization ofthat function is complicated. On the other hand,it is not known whether, for example, the automationof keeping the balance by the exoskeletonwill not contribute to the weakening of thisfunction in the exoskeleton’s user.Moreover, the significant part of the research is conductedon the population of the healthy people, also inthe area of a possible influence of the exoskeleton uponthe changes in the movement patterns. It is caused, interalia, by the fact that the origins of the research uponexoskeletons were of a military nature, focusing on theuse of exoskeletons for expanding the endurance andlifting the capacity of individual soldiers. Additionally, incase of research on people with deficiencies, there isa whole range of types and levels of deficits, to whichthe tested exoskeleton would have to be individuallyadjusted. Also the research is being conducted on thedevelopment of the reliable indicators in the area ofcompliance of the cooperation of the exoskeleton setwith the elements of limbs while making a movement,both in the form of a simple 3D analysis of the movementand the coordination, speed and chronology ofthe rotation in the joints for whole limbs. One of the possiblesolutions is the registration and the measuring ofthe position of a limb and the forces while making thespecific movement [24]. That research is particularlyimportant also for further development of the stationaryrehabilitation robots. An interesting solution for gettingrid of some of those problems is an attempt to developHAL exoskeleton for one leg (hemiplegic) – particularlyfor patients with hemiplegics [25].ConclusionsIn the coming years, one can expect the results of theEuropean clinical trials on the use of the HAL 5 exoskeletonsin rehabilitation, launched in 2010 in (among others)Odense University Hospital in Denmark [26]). Apartfrom the progress in therapy, particularly of neurologicaldisorders, the research may bring the improvementin understanding of physiology, biomechanics, nervouscontrol and the energetic cost of the human movementboth in case of the healthy people, and the ones withdeficits. Nonetheless, taking into account the comingimplementation of the commercial exoskeletons, onehas to identify and analyze today, the problems and potentialthreats, particularly in the area of biomechanics.LITERATURE • PIŚMIENNICTWO[1] Cheron G, Duvinage M, De Saedeleer C et al.: Fromspinal central pattern generators to cortical network:integrated BCI for walking rehabilitation. Neural Plasticity[online], <strong>2012</strong>: 13. Available from: www.hindawi.com/journals/np/aip/375148.pdf, article ID 375148 [access:04.01.<strong>2012</strong>].[2] Gancet J, Ilzkovitz M, Cheron G et al.: MINDWALKER:A Brain Controlled Lower Limbs Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation.Potential Applications To Space. ESA ASTRAWorkshop [online], April 2011. Available from: http://robotics.estec.esa.int/ASTRA/Astra2011/Presentations/session%203b/02_gancet.pdf [access: 04.01.<strong>2012</strong>].[3] Wang L, Van Asseldonk EHF: Model predictive controlbasedgait pattern generation for wearable exoskeletons.IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics(ICORR), 2011: 1–6.[4] Strausser KA, Swift TA, Zoss AB, Kazerooni H: PrototypeMedical Exoskeleton for Paraplegic Mobility: FirstExperimental Results. Abstracts of The 3rd AnnualDynamic Systems and Control Conference, September13–15, 2010, Boston, MA, USA. Available form: https://asme-dscd.papercept.net/conferences/scripts/abstract.pl?ConfID=4&Number=4261 [access: 04.01.<strong>2012</strong>].[5] Swift TA, Strausser KA, Zoss AB, Kazerooni H: Controland Experimental Results for Post Stroke Gait Rehabilitationwith a Prototype Mobile Medical Exoskeleton.Abstracts of The 3rd Annual Dynamic Systems andControl Conference, September 13–15, 2010, Boston,MA, USA. Available from: https://asme-dscd.papercept.net/conferences/conferences/DSC10/program/DSC10_ContentListWeb_1.html [access: 04.01.<strong>2012</strong>].[6] Mikołajewska E, Mikołajewski D: Applications of automationand robotics in wheelchairs for the disabled andmedical exoskeletons [in Polish]. Pomiary AutomatykaRobotyka, 2011; 5: 58–64.[7] Mikołajewska E, Mikołajewski D: Exoskeletons in neurologicaldiseases – current and potential future applications.Adv Clin Exp Med., 2011; 20, 2: 227–233.– 120 –
- Page 2:
ISSN 1731-0652COMMITTEE FOR REHABIL
- Page 5 and 6:
ANTROPOMOTORYKAISSN 1731-0652KOMITE
- Page 7 and 8:
NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 9 and 10:
From Editorsching stimulus had a po
- Page 12 and 13:
NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 14 and 15:
NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 16:
ORIGINAL PAPERSPRACE ORYGINALNE
- Page 19 and 20:
Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 21 and 22:
Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 23 and 24:
Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 25 and 26:
Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 28 and 29:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 30 and 31:
The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 32 and 33:
The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 34 and 35:
The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 36 and 37:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 38 and 39:
Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 40 and 41:
Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 42 and 43:
Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 44:
Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 47 and 48:
Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 49 and 50:
Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 51 and 52:
Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 53 and 54:
Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 55 and 56:
Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 58 and 59:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 60 and 61:
Assessment of the effectiveness of
- Page 62 and 63:
Assessment of the effectiveness of
- Page 64 and 65:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 66 and 67:
Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 68 and 69:
Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 70 and 71: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 72 and 73: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 74 and 75: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 76 and 77: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 78 and 79: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 80 and 81: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 82: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 85 and 86: Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 87 and 88: Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 89 and 90: Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 91 and 92: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoCe
- Page 93 and 94: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoD.
- Page 95 and 96: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 97 and 98: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 99 and 100: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 101 and 102: Jerzy Januszewski, Edward Mleczkoof
- Page 104 and 105: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 106 and 107: Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 108 and 109: Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 110 and 111: Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 112 and 113: Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 114: REVIEW PAPERSPRACE PRZEGLĄDOWE
- Page 117 and 118: Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko
- Page 119: Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko