13.07.2015 Views

Antropomotoryka nr 57 [2012]. - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego ...

Antropomotoryka nr 57 [2012]. - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego ...

Antropomotoryka nr 57 [2012]. - Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Walking as a tool of physical fitness and body composition influenceactivity programs carried out by the Faculty of PhysicalEducation and Sports, Charles University in Prague. Theresearch was performed on subjects residing in the areaof Prague, without objective internal limitation. Before theparticipation in this study, all researched individuals weresubjected to the medical evaluation and dynamical assessmentof ECG and blood pressure that was conductedby a physician one week before the start of the program.Selected anthropometrical and maximal functionalvariables are collected in Tables 1–3.Before the beginning of each movement diagnosticsit was necessary to verify the movement ability of subjects(whether the particular subject was able to performthe movement activity that would be under assessment).This process could be divided in two parts [41]:– s k i l l s : the level of movements decisive for diagnosticsevaluation and resulted from absolved training,– m u s c l e s s t a t e (morphological, strength,etc.): strongly dependent on genetic predispositionsbut under the influence of imposed training.The maximal functional variables were determinedon a treadmill with the slope of 5% during a progressivewalking test until subjective exhaustion. The initialTable 1. Selected anthropometric and functional variables collected before and after a movement intervention in adultsBM (kg)BM (%)FFM (kg)FFM (%)BF abs(%)BF rel(%)BCM (kg)BCM (%)ECM/BCMECM/BCM (%)Variables Before After79.1 ± 7.910064.0 ± 3.810019.1 ± 3.110035.2 ± 3.71000.82 ± 0.0310075.6 ± 7.8*95.6 ± 4.6*65.4 ± 6.7*102.0 ± 5.2*15.9 ± 2.8**83.2 ± 3.1**37.0 ± 2.8*105.1 ± 2.7**0.78 ± 0.02**95.2 ± 3.2**HR max(b · min –1 ) 178 ± 7 176 ± 6VO 2max· kg –1 (ml)VO 2max· kg –1 (%)v max(5%) (km · h –1 )v max(5%) (%)* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.0133.1 ± 5.31006.8 ± 1.110038.7 ± 4.8**117.0 ± 3.3**7.8 ± 0.9**115.0 ± 1.5**Table 2. Selected anthropometric and functional variables collected before and after a movement intervention in seniorsBM (kg)BM (%)FFM (kg)FFM (%)Fat abs(%)Fat rel(%)BCM (kg)BCM (%)ECM/BCMECM/BCM (%)Variables Before After69.9 ± 7.910043.7 ± 6.810037.5 ± 5.110022.8 ± 5.01000.92 ± 0.0310070.4 ± 7.8100.7 ± 5.945.9 ± 6.7*105.0 ± 5.2*36.9 ± 4.898.4 ± 3.925.1 ± 4.8**110.0 ± 2.7**0.82 ± 0.02**89.2 ± 3.6**HR max(b · min –1 ) 134 ± 6 133 ± 5VO 2max· kg –1 (ml)VO 2max· kg –1 (%)%VO 2max· kg –1 (%)v max(5%) (km · h –1 )v max(5%) (%)%v max(%)* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.0117.5 ± 3.010067.4 ± 3.24.4 ± 3.110073.3 ± 2.919.0 ± 3.2**108.6 ± 3.7**67.8 ± 3.0**4.7 ± 3.4**106.8 ± 3.372.3 ± 3.0– 67 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!