The impact of rapid weight loss on the competitive preparation of judoistsniors who reduced their body weights won 9 competitions(an average of 1.8 per person), and those whodid not reduce their body weights won 20 competitions(average of 2.5). The opposite relationship was noted inthe group of the seniors where judoists reducing theirbody weights won 23 competitions (average of 2.3) andthose non-reducing only 8 (average of 1.6) (Fig. 5).Figure 3. Average results of medicine ball throw of juniors andseniors, reducing and non-reducing body weight (* significanceat p < 0.05)(anxiety as a state of mind) in first and second measurementsamong the contenders non-reducing bodyweight. Among those who did reduce body weight,an increase of STAI values was noted (the differenceamounted to p = 0.38 among juniors and p = 0.002among seniors Fig. 4). It is interesting to note that theSTAI results of anxiety as a feature among seniors reducingbody weight were also significantly higher (p =0.044).Figure 5. Average number of winning fights of judoists reducingand non-reducing body weightThe contenders reducing their body weightsachieved worse results in fitness tests conducted 1 daybefore the contest. The greatest differences, p = 0.015and p = 0.011, respectively, were noted in the powertests of the lower limbs and explosive strength of theupper limbs and torso in the group of those reducingbody weight, which fulfilled the training assumptions(Fig. 6 and 7).Figure 4. Average points STAI – state anxiety of juniors andseniors, reducing and non-reducing body weight (** significanceat p < 0.01)Over half of the juniors (n = 8) and only 40% of theseniors achieved the foreseen result assumptions. Inthe group of those reducing body weight, 2 juniors and5 seniors fulfilled the expectations of the training staff,while in the group of those who did not reduce theirbody weight, there were 6 juniors and only 1 senior.The participants of the program fought a total of 94fights in the targeted contests (46 juniors, 48 seniors),in which they won 60 (juniors, 20; seniors, 31). The juFigure 6. Average results of the long jump of judoists, reducingand non-reducing body weight (“+” competitors who have carriedout the coaching plan; ”–“ competitors who have not carried outthe coaching plan), (** significance at p < 0.01)The assessment of psychological conditions indicatedgreater increase of the STAI point value amongcontenders reducing body weight (p = 0.01). Analyzing– 31 –
Dariusz Boguszewski, Katarzyna Boguszewska, Jakub AdamczykFigure 7. Average results of medicine ball throw of judoists,reducing and non-reducing body weight (“+” competitors whohave carried out the coaching plan; “–“ competitors who havenot carried out the coaching plan), (* significance at p < 0.05;** significance at p < 0.01)the results from the point of view of the fulfillment of theinitial targets, it turned out that the sportsmen who didnot fulfill them achieved significantly higher STAI resultsthan the remaining ones. The differences were: p = 0.05in the reducing group and p = 0.0076 in the group notreducing the body weight, respectively (Fig. 8).Figure 8. Average points STAI – state anxiety of judoists reducingand non-reducing body weight (“+” competitors who have carriedout the coaching plan; ”–“ competitors who have not carried outthe coaching plan), (* significance at p < 0.05)DiscussionAlthough the negative impact of body weight reductionupon the contender’s organism has been proved [7, 8],the reduction of body weight is common in those sportsin which competition is divided into weight categories(boxing, kickboxing, wrestling, judo, weight lifting) aswell as in those sports where there are no formal weightlimits but contender’s body weight is a factor havinginfluence upon competitive results (ski jumping, climbing,some track and field competitions). The weightloss problem concerns the majority of the competitivesportsmen in these sports.In the research group, over half of the contendersreduced body weight before contests. Some of themhad been doing that for many years and before everycontest. The sportsmen lost average of 4.1 kg, whichequals 5.4% of body weight. In comparison, accordingto research by Kinigham and Gorenflo, 77% ofyoung American wrestlers reduced their body weightby over 2.27 kg [13]; British wrestlers and boxers, byan average of 5–10% [17]. The speed of these reductionsvaries. For instance, according to Japanese research,among judo contenders it amounts to 2.8 kga day [18], and among Australian body builders, 1.4kg a day [19].Body weight reduction concerns younger andyounger contenders. The average age of beginning topractice BWR in the researched group of judoists was15.5 years. According to Smith et al., British boxersaged 14–16 years reduce their body weight an averageof 2.8% [20].The leading method of reducing body weight is limitingthe amount of food [21] or limiting or eliminatingsome energetic substrates from the diet [22]. Additionalmethods are limiting the amount of liquids, intensifyingphysical effort or exercise in warmer, airtight suits. Itreferred to judoists, kick boxers [11], karatekas, andweightlifters [21].The majority of contenders feel the negative effectsof BWR. The principal reason here is the decrease ofglycogen supply, blood buffer capacity, volume of plasma,density of plasma proteins and triacylglycerols, B6vitamin and magnesium, and the increase of free fatacids and cholesterol in plasma [7, 12, 22, 23]. Duringthe gradual body weight reduction, anaerobic capacitydoes not diminish; however, the slowed re-synthesis ofglycogen and the loss of proteins from muscles mayinfluence competitive results. [24]. Ziemlanski provedthat rapid loss of 5% of body weight lowers physicalcapacity even by 30%, no matter which BWR methodwas used [25]. Physical effort combined with diet restrictionsincrease plasma activity of keratin kinesis,which indicates damage to muscles, which increasesrisk of injury [7].The negative impact of BWR on a contender’s psychologicalcondition was also proved [21]. The psychologicalfactor seems to be of no lesser importance, andin combat sports may be even crucial, as the results ofthe conducted research seem to suggest.– 32 –
- Page 2: ISSN 1731-0652COMMITTEE FOR REHABIL
- Page 5 and 6: ANTROPOMOTORYKAISSN 1731-0652KOMITE
- Page 7 and 8: NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 9 and 10: From Editorsching stimulus had a po
- Page 12 and 13: NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 14 and 15: NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 16: ORIGINAL PAPERSPRACE ORYGINALNE
- Page 19 and 20: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 21 and 22: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 23 and 24: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 25 and 26: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 28 and 29: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 30 and 31: The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 34 and 35: The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 36 and 37: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 38 and 39: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 40 and 41: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 42 and 43: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 44: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 47 and 48: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 49 and 50: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 51 and 52: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 53 and 54: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 55 and 56: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 58 and 59: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 60 and 61: Assessment of the effectiveness of
- Page 62 and 63: Assessment of the effectiveness of
- Page 64 and 65: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 66 and 67: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 68 and 69: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 70 and 71: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 72 and 73: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 74 and 75: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 76 and 77: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 78 and 79: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 80 and 81: Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 82:
Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 85 and 86:
Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 87 and 88:
Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 89 and 90:
Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 91 and 92:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoCe
- Page 93 and 94:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoD.
- Page 95 and 96:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 97 and 98:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 99 and 100:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 101 and 102:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward Mleczkoof
- Page 104 and 105:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 106 and 107:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 108 and 109:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 110 and 111:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 112 and 113:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 114:
REVIEW PAPERSPRACE PRZEGLĄDOWE
- Page 117 and 118:
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko
- Page 119 and 120:
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko
- Page 121 and 122:
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko