NR <strong>57</strong> <strong>2012</strong>ANTROPOMOTORYKASTRETCHING AND STRENGTH EXERCISESIN RELATION TO RUNNING SPEED AND ANAEROBICPOWER IN BASKETBALL PLAYERSĆWICZENIA ROZCIĄGAJĄCE I SIŁOWE W RELACJIZ SZYBKOŚCIĄ BIEGOWĄ I MOCĄ ANAEROBOWĄKOSZYKARZYKazimierz Mikołajec*, Adam Maszczyk**, Arkadiusz Stanula**,Ryszard Litkowycz*, Adam Zając****** PhD, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Department of Team Sports, Chair of Basketball, Katowice,Poland*** PhD, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Department of Sports Theory, Chair of Methodology and Statistics,Katowice, Poland*** Prof. Dr. Habil., Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Department of Sports Theory, Katowice, PolandKey words: basketball, stretching, strength exercises, anaerobic power, running speedSłowa kluczowe: koszykówka, rozciąganie, ćwiczenia siłowe, moc anaerobowa, szybkośćbiegowaSUMMARY • STRESZCZENIEAim of the study. This study aimed to identify the effect of stretching and strength exercises on runningspeed and anaerobic power of young (13–15 years old) basketball players, and the relationships betweenvariables representing their speed, anaerobic power and flexibility.Material and methods. Thirty-six young basketball players were randomly allocated to 3 groups (GR, GSand GC) that carried out special 3-month training programs. Before the training macrocycle commenced andafter it ended, the participants were tested for running speed, anaerobic power and flexibility.Results. ANOVA and post hoc test showed that the “training factor” distinguished more clearly the strengthexercise subgroup and the stretching exercise subgroup (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively). The discriminantanalysis showed that power, 5-meter running speed and 20-meter running speed were these variablesthat distinguished the strength exercise subgroup. In addition, the results of post hoc tests, pointed the level offlexibility as a factor which discriminated more clearly subgroups GR and GS, and then GS and GC (p = 0.005,p = 0.009 and p = 0.006, p = 0.012, respectively).Conclusions. The experiment has demonstrated that under the absence of strong stretching stimuli evenlow-volume strength exercises lead to the dynamic development of anaerobic power, running speed and flexibility,whereas more intensive stretching exercises limit improvements in these motor abilities.Cel pracy. Badanie miało na celu określenie wpływu ćwiczeń rozciągających i siłowych na sprawność szybkościowąi moc beztlenową młodych (13–15 lat) koszykarzy oraz zależności między następującymi zmiennymi:szybkość, moc anaerobowa a elastyczność.Materiał i metody. 36 młodych koszykarzy podzielono losowo na 3 grupy realizujące 3-miesięczny specyficznyprogram treningowy: GR (rozciąganie), GS (akcent rozwoju siły), GK (grupa kontrolna). Przed rozpoczęciem i pozakończeniu makrocyklu zostały przeprowadzone próby oceniające poziom szybkości biegowej (5 m, 20 m), mocyanaerobowej (wyskok dosiężny na platformie tensometrycznej) oraz gibkości.– 17 –
Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk, Arkadiusz Stanula, Ryszard Litkowycz, Adam ZającWyniki. ANOVA i testy post hoc wykazały, że czynnik treningowy różnicuje bardziej podgrupę realizującą ćwiczeniasiłowe i rozciąganie podgrupy wysiłkowej (odpowiednio p = 0,002 i p = 0,003). Analiza dyskryminacyjnadowiodła, że moc anaerobowa, szybkość biegowa 5 m i szybkość biegowa 20 m – to zmienne dyskryminującepodgrupę realizującą program ćwiczeń siłowych. Wyniki analiz post hoc wskazały dodatkowo, iż poziom gibkościto czynnik różnicujący podgrupy GR i GS, a następnie GS i GW (odpowiednio, p = 0,005, p = 0,009 i p = 0,006,p = 0,012).Wnioski. Eksperyment wykazał, że ćwiczenia siłowe, wykonywane nawet z małą objętością, przy braku intensywnychbodźców rozciągających pozwalają na dynamiczny rozwój mocy anaerobowej i szybkości biegowejoraz gibkości, gdy tymczasem intensyfikacja ćwiczeń rozciągających ogranicza przyrost tych zdolności motorycznych.IntroductionModern concepts of physical training for competitivesports are based on the multifaceted disciplineor event-specific fitness preparation, that assumesexercise periodization and pays special attention tothe calendar of sports events (competitions), correctlyselected exercise volume and intensity, as well as toperiodic change of training means and methods. Theterm “physical training” has been replaced today with“physical preparation systems or programs” for athletes.These programmes are characterized by appropriatelybalanced proportions of exercises developingathletes’ muscle strength, power, speed, coordination,agility, flexibility, local anaerobic endurance, as well asaerobic endurance. Because the proportions shouldclosely correspond to the physical effort during anevent, special training programmes have been developedfor each discipline, which additionally addressathlete’s age, sex, training experience and the trainingand competition circumstances.In team sports fitness training is also frequently adjustedto players’ positions on court and their respectivetasks.A major methodological and training problem incompetitive sports is posed by the need to determinehow stretching exercises performed in the warm-upphase, as part of the main phase of a training unit,or before the competition affect athletes’ speed andstrength [1].This knowledge is critical in the case of sprints andathletics jumps, combat sports and team games characterizedby dynamic movements, such as volleyball,hockey or basketball.It has been still a matter of controversy whetherstretching exercises improve speed and muscle contractionforce, or whether they rather deteriorate them.Following Kerner and D‘Amico’s opinions [2], mostathletes do stretching exercises before a training unit oran event. Evidence has been appearing, though, thatnot only do stretching exercises done before an eventnot protect the athlete from injuries, but they also havea negative effect on their performance.As suggested by Witvrouw [3], stretching exercisesmay fulfil their protective role in sports involving dynamictake-offs and rapid changes in movement directions,such as soccer, volleyball and basketball. This opinionwould be justified, if a stretched muscle was capable ofabsorbing larger amounts of energy.Many studies have shown that stretching exerciseshave a positive effect on muscle contraction speedand force, thus improving parameters such as take-offspeed and absolute speed [4, 5, 6], jumping ability [7,8, 9], balance and the reaction time [10, 11], as well aspower [12].Other authors are of the opinion that intensivestretching reduces maximal strength, the height ofa vertical jump, take-off speed and absolute speed.The data they present lead to a rational conclusion thatthis type of exercises should not be done before verydynamic physical activity [13, 14, 15, 16].While the aspects of muscle strength and powerdevelopment are relatively well-covered in the literatureand the opinions on the effectiveness of particulartraining means and methods are quite consistent,the methodology which is employed to develop flexibilityand the actual stretching effects on athlete’sperformance stir many controversies. A common positionon how stretching exercises contribute to injuryprevention, physical fitness and athletic performancein the power and speed sports and those requiringtechnique and coordination has not been adopted yet[17, 18, 19].Intensive stretching damages contractile proteins inthe skeletal muscles, as well as the muscles’ ability toregenerate after effort.This study sought answers to the following questions:– 18 –
- Page 2: ISSN 1731-0652COMMITTEE FOR REHABIL
- Page 5 and 6: ANTROPOMOTORYKAISSN 1731-0652KOMITE
- Page 7 and 8: NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 9 and 10: From Editorsching stimulus had a po
- Page 12 and 13: NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 14 and 15: NR 57 ANTROPOMOTORYKA20
- Page 16: ORIGINAL PAPERSPRACE ORYGINALNE
- Page 21 and 22: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 23 and 24: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 25 and 26: Kazimierz Mikołajec, Adam Maszczyk
- Page 28 and 29: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 30 and 31: The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 32 and 33: The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 34 and 35: The impact of rapid weight loss on
- Page 36 and 37: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 38 and 39: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 40 and 41: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 42 and 43: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 44: Body response of hurdle runners to
- Page 47 and 48: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 49 and 50: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 51 and 52: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 53 and 54: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 55 and 56: Ewa Dybińska, Marcin Kaca, Magdale
- Page 58 and 59: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 60 and 61: Assessment of the effectiveness of
- Page 62 and 63: Assessment of the effectiveness of
- Page 64 and 65: NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 66 and 67: Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 68 and 69:
Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 70 and 71:
Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 72 and 73:
Walking as a tool of physical fitne
- Page 74 and 75:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 76 and 77:
Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 78 and 79:
Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 80 and 81:
Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 82:
Functional and dynamic asymmetry in
- Page 85 and 86:
Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 87 and 88:
Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 89 and 90:
Beata Wojtyczek, Małgorzata Pasła
- Page 91 and 92:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoCe
- Page 93 and 94:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoD.
- Page 95 and 96:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 97 and 98:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 99 and 100:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward MleczkoTa
- Page 101 and 102:
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward Mleczkoof
- Page 104 and 105:
NR 57 2012ANTROPOMOTORY
- Page 106 and 107:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 108 and 109:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 110 and 111:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 112 and 113:
Anthropological evaluation of the i
- Page 114:
REVIEW PAPERSPRACE PRZEGLĄDOWE
- Page 117 and 118:
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko
- Page 119 and 120:
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko
- Page 121 and 122:
Emilia Mikołajewska, Dariusz Miko