13.07.2015 Views

Promoting Green Power in Canada - Centre for Human Settlements

Promoting Green Power in Canada - Centre for Human Settlements

Promoting Green Power in Canada - Centre for Human Settlements

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Promot<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> Pollution Probe“The most important aspect of a subsidymay not be its specific elementsor amounts, but its certa<strong>in</strong>ty.”REPP 1999scheduled to rise from currently (US) 1.7 to1.8¢/kWh as of 2003, whereas the Canadian<strong>in</strong>centive will be reduced to 0.8¢/kWh afterfive years [NRE 2002, p. 21] (see Figure 4.8).As discussed <strong>in</strong> chapter 4.4, it is important tocreate long-term f<strong>in</strong>ancial security <strong>for</strong> anygiven project, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g renewable powerprojects, to attract <strong>in</strong>vestors. Ten years is seenas the m<strong>in</strong>imum necessary duration ofgovernment support <strong>in</strong> the renewable powersector [REPP 1999, p. 23]. A comparison ofCali<strong>for</strong>nia and the U.S. with Denmark andGermany shows that w<strong>in</strong>d power generationrose steadily <strong>in</strong> the European countries,whereas it grew and shrunk <strong>in</strong> a boom-andbustmanner <strong>in</strong> the U.S. Figure 4.9 showsthat not only was the growth <strong>in</strong> the USirregular, but also it was much smaller <strong>in</strong>total. The busts can easily be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by<strong>in</strong>security created by unstable policies, suchas expiration of <strong>in</strong>vestment tax credits,production tax credits and long-termcontract provisions [JLS 2001, pp. 355f.].This tendency can still be observed today <strong>in</strong>the US, where a boom of w<strong>in</strong>d power<strong>in</strong>stallations took place <strong>in</strong> 2001, as manydevelopers tried to capture the tax credit,which was go<strong>in</strong>g to expire that year.Although the tax credit was then extended<strong>for</strong> another two years, predictions <strong>in</strong>dicatethat new <strong>in</strong>stallations <strong>in</strong> 2002 will be muchlower only to <strong>in</strong>crease aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>for</strong> the year2003, after which the tax credit will expireonce aga<strong>in</strong>. Such irregular fund<strong>in</strong>g can leadto a sudden halt <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestments and it couldtake a long time be<strong>for</strong>e activity starts aga<strong>in</strong>when support mechanisms are reactivated,lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>efficiencies and losses ofmillions of dollars compared to stablepolicies that tend to be more effective even ifthe overall budget is lower [ibid., p. 363]. Itis there<strong>for</strong>e crucial to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> predictabilityand consistency <strong>in</strong> all policies support<strong>in</strong>grenewable power sources. Denmark; <strong>for</strong>example, is us<strong>in</strong>g a 30 year time horizon <strong>for</strong>Added Capacity <strong>in</strong> MW0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000199019911992199319941995Electric <strong>Power</strong> Act passedProduction Tax Credit beganStart of power market deregulation19961997199819992000200120022003Production Tax Credit expiredProduction Tax Credit extendedProduction Tax Credit expiredProduction Tax Credit extendedProduction Tax Credit expiresUSA GermanyFigure 4.9 — Comparison of W<strong>in</strong>d Generation Capacity Growth and Related Policies <strong>in</strong>Germany and the US (based on [JLS 2001, p. 356f.])92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!