<strong>Promot<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> Pollution ProbeYear 1 Year 2 Year 3New Sources:5%RE/EE5%New Sources:5%RE/EE5%New Sources:5%RE/EE5%Current NOxEmissions:100%Old Sources:90%BankedAllowances (ifany)Old Sources:90%BankedAllowances (ifany)Old Sources:90%Year 1: 90% of current NOx emissions are allocated to exist<strong>in</strong>g sources, 5% are set aside <strong>for</strong> new emitt<strong>in</strong>gplants, 5% are set aside <strong>for</strong> renewable energy/energy efficiency.Year 2: The same amounts are set aside, unused allowances may be banked.Year 3: Like year 2, “new” sources of year 1 have become “old” sources.NOTE: The total amount of allowances can decrease if some of the allowances are retired, or if loweremission per<strong>for</strong>mance standards come <strong>in</strong>to <strong>for</strong>ce. After a few years, the government may decide toreduce the overall amount of allowances granted.Figure 4.3 — Allocation of NOx Allowances to Old and New Sources and RenewableEnergy/Energy Efficiency ProjectsFigure 4.3 describes the allocation process<strong>for</strong> NOx emission allowances over the firstthree years of a generic set-aside program.First, the overall emissions are assessed (the“budget”) and allowances allocatedaccord<strong>in</strong>g to each power and steamgeneration “budget unit.” Under cap-andtradeprovisions, these budget units are notallowed to emit more NOx than theequivalent of the complete allowance pool.In order to enable electricity production toexpand accord<strong>in</strong>g to demand, part of theallowances pool (e.g., 5% <strong>in</strong> Massachusetts)is be<strong>in</strong>g set aside as a New Unit Set-Asideand is allocated to newly built powergeneration units. Along the same l<strong>in</strong>es, theUS Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)<strong>in</strong>troduced a new k<strong>in</strong>d of set-asides, oftencalled public benefit set-asides, to account<strong>for</strong> the air pollution emission reductionsfrom energy efficiency and renewable power(EE/RE) <strong>in</strong> the framework of exist<strong>in</strong>g NOxtrad<strong>in</strong>g schemes. The model proposed by theEPA is to set aside another 5% of allowances<strong>in</strong> each of the first three years and 2% eachyear dur<strong>in</strong>g subsequent years <strong>for</strong> the EE/REset-aside pool. Each year, renewable powerand energy efficiency projects can apply tobe allocated these “set-aside” allowances[EPA 2000]. States have so far implementedsmaller set-aside pools of only 3–5%, whichtends to be under-subscribed accord<strong>in</strong>g tocurrent experience [EPA 2002a]. If either ofthe two set-aside allowance pools is not usedup <strong>in</strong> a given year, states generally allow theshift<strong>in</strong>g of surplus allowances from one poolto the other. Other options are bank<strong>in</strong>g them<strong>for</strong> the next year, or redistribut<strong>in</strong>g them toemitt<strong>in</strong>g units. Indef<strong>in</strong>ite bank<strong>in</strong>g ofallowances is allowed, but the value ofallowances can be reduced by the programadm<strong>in</strong>istrator if more than 10% of theoverall budget is banked.Table 4.2 provides an overview of some basicdesign features the EPA recommends <strong>for</strong>sett<strong>in</strong>g up an EE/RE set-aside. So far, fivestates have developed plans based on theEPA’s EE/RE Set-Aside State ImplementationCall, three of which have been <strong>in</strong> operations<strong>in</strong>ce 1999 (see Appendix F).68
<strong>Promot<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> Pollution ProbeTable 4.2 — EPA-Recommended Design Features of a Set-Aside Mechanism [EPA 1999]Who can apply<strong>for</strong> an EnergyEfficiency andRenewableEnergy (EE/RE)set-asideand allocation?Who cannotapply?Which projectsshould beeligible?Any <strong>in</strong>dividual or organization that uses electricity and can <strong>in</strong>itiate, f<strong>in</strong>ance, orcarry out projects that reduce or displace electricity generation other than at thecore generation units: commercial and <strong>in</strong>dustrial build<strong>in</strong>g owners and operators,energy service companies, home builders and associations, home ownersassociations, federal, state and local government agencies, commercialbus<strong>in</strong>esses, manufacturers and other <strong>in</strong>dustrial energy users, manufacturersleas<strong>in</strong>g or sell<strong>in</strong>g high energy efficiency equipment, as well as governmentagencies, retailers, and electrical generation companies provid<strong>in</strong>g energyefficiency services. Core units will also benefit from reduced energyconsumption as it results <strong>in</strong> a reduced energy production need at the core unit,which will <strong>in</strong> turn free allowances due to reduced emissions. Eligible projectsproject should:· reduce/displace electricity load from core source electricity generationunits (EGUs) <strong>in</strong> the regulated region;· not be required by Federal government regulation;· not be used to generate compliance or permitt<strong>in</strong>g credits otherwise <strong>in</strong> theregulated region;· be <strong>in</strong> operation <strong>in</strong> the year(s) <strong>for</strong> which it will receive allowances;· reduce/displace energy dur<strong>in</strong>g the summer ozone season;· be measured and verified <strong>in</strong> accordance with the methods <strong>in</strong> this guidance;and,· translate <strong>in</strong>to not less than one (1) ton of NOx allowances, or beaggregated with other projects <strong>in</strong>to one-ton <strong>in</strong>crements of NOx allowances.As part of the determ<strong>in</strong>ation as to which projects receive set-aside allowances,EPA generally recommends that energy efficiency or renewables projects thatprovide a direct benefit to entities <strong>in</strong> the <strong>for</strong>m of “freed up” or “extra” allowancesfrom an exist<strong>in</strong>g allocation <strong>in</strong> the NOx Budget Trad<strong>in</strong>g Program not be eligible toreceive allowances from this set-aside. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is recommended thatprojects implemented by core sources who receive an allocation of allowances<strong>in</strong> the NOx Budget Trad<strong>in</strong>g Program not be eligible to receive allowances fromthis set-aside <strong>for</strong> actions which will lower their need <strong>for</strong> and/or free up NOxallowances from their exist<strong>in</strong>g allocations. On-site fuel reductions at coresources are not part of the EE/RE set-aside because (1) they are the result ofsupply-side management actions, and (2) they are self-reward<strong>in</strong>g, as freedallowances can be used elsewhere or traded. Supply-side efficiencyimprovements are not attributable to end user actions <strong>in</strong> the same way thatdemand side management and other energy efficiency and renewable energyactions are <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g electricity generation.Only reductions <strong>in</strong> or displacements of electricity use are eligible. S<strong>in</strong>ce thegoals of the energy efficiency and renewable set-aside is to reward end userimprovements, most demand-side energy efficiency and renewable energyprojects are eligible. To determ<strong>in</strong>e whether or not a project is eligible <strong>for</strong> setasideallowances, two tests must be met. The first consideration is whether or notthe implementation of the project benefits the sponsor<strong>in</strong>g entity by free<strong>in</strong>g upallowances they already have been allocated. This test generally applies to coresources, such as EGUs and non-EGUs, who may be <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> apply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong>set aside allowances <strong>for</strong> the projects they undertake. Second, the project must,at a m<strong>in</strong>imum, meet a number of criteria that ensure the award will work with<strong>in</strong>the NOx Budget Trad<strong>in</strong>g Program and fit with<strong>in</strong> the goals of the set-aside.Whereas <strong>in</strong> general projects required by legislation should not be eligible, thisshould not apply to those benefit<strong>in</strong>g from System Benefits Charges or thoserequired under an RPS obligation, Model Energy Codes, or Executive Orders.69