Sartre's second century
Sartre's second century
Sartre's second century
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The New Sartre: A Postmodern Progenitor? 109<br />
and behind". Purpose and play both appear as important themes at<br />
different times in <strong>Sartre's</strong> philosophy, the former being most evident in the<br />
Critique, where he adopts a praxis-based model of agency, and the latter in<br />
his earlier existentialist texts where he assumes a more aestheticist leaning.<br />
Despite the strong Marxist colouration of <strong>Sartre's</strong> social philosophy in<br />
the Critique, the concepts of process and antithesis capture well the<br />
essence and features of the Sartrean dialectic. The concept of totalisation<br />
that looms large in <strong>Sartre's</strong> dialectic involves synthesis insofar as it<br />
consists in drawing disparate elements into a meaningful totality but is<br />
always, as William McBride notes, a "process word" denoting activity,<br />
performance and happening, and so does not refer to a rigorously<br />
completed or definable entity. 14 Similarly, in contrast to the Hegelian<br />
dialectic, the Sartrean dialectic invokes no ultimate synthesis of its<br />
constituent parts (pour-soi and ensoi, "for-itself" and "in-itself f ) that<br />
proceeds towards a state of perfected human consciousness or the "end of<br />
history". <strong>Sartre's</strong> theory of history conceives the historical process in<br />
terms of contingency, chance, negation and circularity, criticising linear<br />
accounts that give history a progressivist telos or intrinsic pattern of<br />
design. 15<br />
The political logic of <strong>Sartre's</strong> work also displays a discernibly<br />
postmodern ethos insofar as it is premised on the eradication of hierarchy<br />
and distance. This blossoms into a form of political activism that drew him<br />
towards political Marxism in the 1940s and 1950s, but eventually drove<br />
him away following May 1968. <strong>Sartre's</strong> archetype of the group-in-fusion<br />
can be seen alongside Deleuze's and Guattari's idea of the subject group<br />
as guiding theoretical models for a new form of political practice that<br />
emerged out of the student revolts of 1968. Unlike the hierarchical,<br />
authoritarian structures of modern political practice, this involves fluid,<br />
egalitarian, anarchic, reciprocal and participatory forms of political<br />
organisation. Although Sartre did not explicitly adopt the dialogue of<br />
"micropolitics" advocated by Foucault, Lyotard and others, his political<br />
project, both before and after the war, is generally consistent with it,<br />
moving beyond the traditional focus of Marxist theory to uncover and<br />
contest wider sources of power and domination in the social field: these<br />
extend beyond the productive order and serve to "jeopardise the exploited<br />
classes to the extent that they intrude into each individual from without<br />
13 Sartre, Being and Nothingness, 182,713,179.<br />
14 McBride, "Existential Marxism and Postmodernism", 332.<br />
15 See, for instance, Critique, 33-35.