03.12.2012 Views

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The New Sartre: A Postmodern Progenitor? 109<br />

and behind". Purpose and play both appear as important themes at<br />

different times in <strong>Sartre's</strong> philosophy, the former being most evident in the<br />

Critique, where he adopts a praxis-based model of agency, and the latter in<br />

his earlier existentialist texts where he assumes a more aestheticist leaning.<br />

Despite the strong Marxist colouration of <strong>Sartre's</strong> social philosophy in<br />

the Critique, the concepts of process and antithesis capture well the<br />

essence and features of the Sartrean dialectic. The concept of totalisation<br />

that looms large in <strong>Sartre's</strong> dialectic involves synthesis insofar as it<br />

consists in drawing disparate elements into a meaningful totality but is<br />

always, as William McBride notes, a "process word" denoting activity,<br />

performance and happening, and so does not refer to a rigorously<br />

completed or definable entity. 14 Similarly, in contrast to the Hegelian<br />

dialectic, the Sartrean dialectic invokes no ultimate synthesis of its<br />

constituent parts (pour-soi and ensoi, "for-itself" and "in-itself f ) that<br />

proceeds towards a state of perfected human consciousness or the "end of<br />

history". <strong>Sartre's</strong> theory of history conceives the historical process in<br />

terms of contingency, chance, negation and circularity, criticising linear<br />

accounts that give history a progressivist telos or intrinsic pattern of<br />

design. 15<br />

The political logic of <strong>Sartre's</strong> work also displays a discernibly<br />

postmodern ethos insofar as it is premised on the eradication of hierarchy<br />

and distance. This blossoms into a form of political activism that drew him<br />

towards political Marxism in the 1940s and 1950s, but eventually drove<br />

him away following May 1968. <strong>Sartre's</strong> archetype of the group-in-fusion<br />

can be seen alongside Deleuze's and Guattari's idea of the subject group<br />

as guiding theoretical models for a new form of political practice that<br />

emerged out of the student revolts of 1968. Unlike the hierarchical,<br />

authoritarian structures of modern political practice, this involves fluid,<br />

egalitarian, anarchic, reciprocal and participatory forms of political<br />

organisation. Although Sartre did not explicitly adopt the dialogue of<br />

"micropolitics" advocated by Foucault, Lyotard and others, his political<br />

project, both before and after the war, is generally consistent with it,<br />

moving beyond the traditional focus of Marxist theory to uncover and<br />

contest wider sources of power and domination in the social field: these<br />

extend beyond the productive order and serve to "jeopardise the exploited<br />

classes to the extent that they intrude into each individual from without<br />

13 Sartre, Being and Nothingness, 182,713,179.<br />

14 McBride, "Existential Marxism and Postmodernism", 332.<br />

15 See, for instance, Critique, 33-35.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!