03.12.2012 Views

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sartre's</strong> Legacy in an Era of Obscurantism 213<br />

The threatened environmental catastrophe, the overriding issue of the<br />

present, could most usefully, with appropriate modifications, be subjected<br />

to the kind of analysis that Sartre carried out on Soviet society in the<br />

unfinished <strong>second</strong> volume of the Critique: "[T]he anti-social forces of the<br />

practico-inert impose a negative unity of self-destruction on the society, by<br />

usurping the unifying power of the praxis which produced them." 26 Indeed<br />

it could almost be possible to imagine fancifully that the Critique might<br />

have been written with this crisis specifically in mind. Consider, for<br />

example, the following, as summarised by Aronson (Sartre was in this<br />

instance discussing problems of industrialisation in the USSR):<br />

For an example of "necessity" revealing praxis as its underside, Sartre<br />

takes the inert synthetic relationship set up between two cities when<br />

industrial expansion requires that their communications be improved [...].<br />

If there is now a scarcity of transport between A and B, this situation<br />

demands new investment of resources. But even this choice will only solve<br />

the problem by posing new ones elsewhere, while retaining the original<br />

practico-inert demands engendered by the original praxis. Necessity then is<br />

"the temporary alienation of this praxis in its own practical field" by<br />

creating new relations between elements of the field. 27<br />

Conclusion<br />

Obscurantist tendencies have always maintained an underground<br />

survival, even in the most rationalist of cultures. The novelty of present<br />

times is that they have flooded to the surface and, to change the metaphor,<br />

are militantly on the march around the globe, and more worryingly still,<br />

they have started to be taken seriously in areas of intellectual discourse. 28<br />

What might be termed the positivist opposition to their penetration,<br />

represented by writers like Francis Wheen or Richard Dawkins, is<br />

handicapped by the lack of an effective philosophical foundation and an<br />

adequate understanding of what has generated them; in other words, they<br />

lack a dialectical comprehension of the processes at work. 29 The strength<br />

of <strong>Sartre's</strong> approach is that it can supply just that: it is capable of totalising<br />

the field under consideration. <strong>Sartre's</strong> philosophy and other writings, and<br />

their engagement with the circumstances and dilemmas of his time, hold<br />

Quoted in Aronson, Second Critique, 115.<br />

27 Ibid., 126.<br />

28 For example, in 2005, The Times Higher Education Supplement (as it then was)<br />

conducted a seemingly serious discussion on the theme of "Intelligent Design".<br />

29 Demonstrated in the dreadful final section of Wheen's otherwise admirable<br />

volume.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!