Sartre's second century
Sartre's second century
Sartre's second century
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Sartre's</strong> Legacy in an Era of Obscurantism 213<br />
The threatened environmental catastrophe, the overriding issue of the<br />
present, could most usefully, with appropriate modifications, be subjected<br />
to the kind of analysis that Sartre carried out on Soviet society in the<br />
unfinished <strong>second</strong> volume of the Critique: "[T]he anti-social forces of the<br />
practico-inert impose a negative unity of self-destruction on the society, by<br />
usurping the unifying power of the praxis which produced them." 26 Indeed<br />
it could almost be possible to imagine fancifully that the Critique might<br />
have been written with this crisis specifically in mind. Consider, for<br />
example, the following, as summarised by Aronson (Sartre was in this<br />
instance discussing problems of industrialisation in the USSR):<br />
For an example of "necessity" revealing praxis as its underside, Sartre<br />
takes the inert synthetic relationship set up between two cities when<br />
industrial expansion requires that their communications be improved [...].<br />
If there is now a scarcity of transport between A and B, this situation<br />
demands new investment of resources. But even this choice will only solve<br />
the problem by posing new ones elsewhere, while retaining the original<br />
practico-inert demands engendered by the original praxis. Necessity then is<br />
"the temporary alienation of this praxis in its own practical field" by<br />
creating new relations between elements of the field. 27<br />
Conclusion<br />
Obscurantist tendencies have always maintained an underground<br />
survival, even in the most rationalist of cultures. The novelty of present<br />
times is that they have flooded to the surface and, to change the metaphor,<br />
are militantly on the march around the globe, and more worryingly still,<br />
they have started to be taken seriously in areas of intellectual discourse. 28<br />
What might be termed the positivist opposition to their penetration,<br />
represented by writers like Francis Wheen or Richard Dawkins, is<br />
handicapped by the lack of an effective philosophical foundation and an<br />
adequate understanding of what has generated them; in other words, they<br />
lack a dialectical comprehension of the processes at work. 29 The strength<br />
of <strong>Sartre's</strong> approach is that it can supply just that: it is capable of totalising<br />
the field under consideration. <strong>Sartre's</strong> philosophy and other writings, and<br />
their engagement with the circumstances and dilemmas of his time, hold<br />
Quoted in Aronson, Second Critique, 115.<br />
27 Ibid., 126.<br />
28 For example, in 2005, The Times Higher Education Supplement (as it then was)<br />
conducted a seemingly serious discussion on the theme of "Intelligent Design".<br />
29 Demonstrated in the dreadful final section of Wheen's otherwise admirable<br />
volume.