03.12.2012 Views

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

82 Chapter Six<br />

German occupation. Metaphysics and political history embrace one<br />

another—that is to say, a metaphysics shaped, at least in part, by political<br />

forces. If, for <strong>Sartre's</strong> generation, the idea of the future is confused, that is<br />

because the war has taught them that it is unpredictable. The future carries<br />

within it a perpetual "lack" of being, or what Valery termed "un creux<br />

toujours futur" ("an always future hollow").<br />

<strong>Sartre's</strong> approach to the question of human freedom in his lecture is<br />

later mirrored in his biographical writing, and we shall now briefly<br />

compare the "authentic" future with <strong>Sartre's</strong> brilliant depiction of its<br />

antithesis in his study of Baudelaire (1947). The poete maudit, "cursed"<br />

by an "original choice", decides in a particular situation what he will be<br />

and who he is: "Feeling of solitude, from my childhood. In spite of<br />

family—and in the midst of friends, especially—the feeling of an eternally<br />

solitary destiny." 23 Although these lines may strike us with their quasiautobiographical<br />

tone for Sartre, nevertheless, Baudelaire's action is of<br />

course, for Sartre, a supreme act of bad faith because the poet has decided<br />

on his own destiny: not only to live in isolation from others, but also to see<br />

himself as an "Other", to look on himself through the eyes of a stranger. In<br />

other words, Baudelaire's future has become cut off from the project of<br />

human transcendence. Later, the scenario is repeated in <strong>Sartre's</strong> study of<br />

Jean Genet, the man whose "original choice" is to label himself a "thief.<br />

However, Sartre emphasises that the original choice of one man never<br />

affects just one individual. The morality of existentialism is that in<br />

choosing for himself, man chooses for the whole human race. In this<br />

context, Simone de Beauvoir cites Dostoyevsky as the preface to her<br />

<strong>second</strong> novel, Le Sang des autres {The Blood of Others, 1945): "Each one<br />

of us is responsible for everything and to every human being." 24<br />

Arguably, this epigraph could equally well apply to recent events in<br />

Iraq, where clearly the original choices and actions of individual men have<br />

had worldwide media coverage and global repercussions. In choosing to<br />

go to war, for whatever the reason, President Bush and Prime Minister<br />

Blair have chosen for the whole of humanity, and a new generation is<br />

discovering the meaning of <strong>Sartre's</strong> humanistic emphasis on the<br />

interrelated existential terms of "anguish", "despair" and "abandonment".<br />

These terms underlie the relevance of existential humanism today, because<br />

we shall always live in a "human" universe. We could modify <strong>Sartre's</strong><br />

"Sentiment de solitude, des mon enfance. Malgre* la famille—et au milieu des<br />

camarades, surtout—sentiment de destine*e dternellement solitaire" (Sartre,<br />

Baudelaire, 19).<br />

24 "Chacun est responsable de tout devant tous" (epigraph to Simone de Beauvoir's<br />

Le Sang des autres).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!