03.12.2012 Views

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

Sartre's second century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Temporality and the Death of Lucienne in Nausea 49<br />

and Nothingness, Sartre repudiates these conceptions of the past by<br />

describing the temporal structure of consciousness, and by describing the<br />

past as an integral aspect of this structure. In Nausea, the repudiation of<br />

these conceptions takes a different form. Rather than describing the<br />

temporality of consciousness directly, Sartre has Roquentin illustrate this<br />

temporality by way of his stream-of-consciousness reaction to the news of<br />

Lucienne's murder.<br />

Upon hearing of the fate of Lucienne, Roquentin admits to having a<br />

desire to rape. He describes how this desire comes upon him: "A soft<br />

criminal desire to rape catches me from behind." 9 Note how Sartre has<br />

Roquentin emphasise this formulation of being taken "from behind":<br />

[...] existence takes my thoughts from behind and gently expands from<br />

behind; someone takes me from behind, they force me to think from<br />

behind, therefore to be something, behind me [...] he runs, he runs like a<br />

ferret, "from behind" from behind from behind [...]. 10<br />

Sartre has Roquentin repeat the phrase "from behind" a total of thirteen<br />

times in the space of a page and a half. Why does Sartre place such<br />

emphasis on this formulation?<br />

The reason can be found in <strong>Sartre's</strong> discussion of temporality in Being<br />

and Nothingness. This formulation plays a very specific role in <strong>Sartre's</strong><br />

phenomenology of temporality. I give below three examples from Being<br />

and Nothingness in which Sartre describes the past as an unavoidable<br />

obligation that catches one "from behind":<br />

[...] the past is precisely and only that ontological structure which obliges<br />

me to be what I am from behind. 11<br />

The past is given as a for-itself become in-itself [...]. It has become what it<br />

was—behind me. 12<br />

[...] the Past is an ontological law of the For-itself; that is, everything<br />

which can be a For-itself must be back there behind itself [.. .]. 13<br />

Sartre uses this imagery of being claimed "from behind" to describe our<br />

relation to the past. The past is an ontological structure of consciousness<br />

9<br />

Nausea, 101.<br />

10<br />

Ibid., 102.<br />

11<br />

Being and Nothingness, 172.<br />

12<br />

Ibid., 174.<br />

13<br />

Ibid., 175.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!